Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a upadhyaya · Page 1 of about 1,847 results (0.337 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 23 1998

Km. Rohini Singh Vs. Visitor, B.H.U., President of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-23-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 - Sections 18

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC387

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;V.K. Upadhyaya, Adv.

O.P. Garg, J.1. The petitioner Km. Rohini Singh appeared in the entrance test for admission to M.Ed. course 1997-98 conducted by Banaras Hindu University (for short 'B.H.U.'). On 8.9.1997 a letter was received by her from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2004

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Varanasi Nagar Vikas

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-31-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 37

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(All)323; [2005]275ITR140(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Abhinav Upadhyaya, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J. 1. The Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for opinion to this Court ;'Whether, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2003

V.K. Kaul Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT390; 2004(1)MPLJ104

Advocate for Respondent : H.K. Upadhyaya, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4

Dipak Misra, J.In this batch of appeals, the factual matrix and grounds urged being common, it was heard analogously and is disposed of by this common order.1. The compass of the factual score as depicted is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 18 2003

Kalusingh and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-2003

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18 and 50

Reported in : 2003(89)ECC46; 2003(2)MPHT388; 2003(2)MPLJ355

Advocate for Respondent : Mayank Upadhyaya, Dy. Govt. Adv.

S.L. Kochar, J.1. Being dissatisfied with the judgment dated 10-10-98 passed by the Special Judge (Under N.D.P.S. Act), Mandsaur in Special Case No. 8/97, thereby convicting the appellants for the offence under Section 8/18 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1995

Manoj Kumar Saraf, Vs. Magadh Stock Exchange Association and ors. and ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-03-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Securities Contracts (Regulations) Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 29, 31, 34, 136 and 227; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Regulations, 1992

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Shahi and Rajesh Kumar, Advs. and Saroj Kumar Upadhyaya, Adv. for Respondent No. 5 in CWJC No. 1308 of 1991

Sachchidanand Jha, J. 1. The petitioners, members of the Magadh Stock Exchange Association, a company incorporated under the Companies Act,1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the stock exchange'), are aggrieved by the decision declaring them as defaulters...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2006

Smt. Sangita Yadav W/O Sri Rajesh Kumar Vs. General Manager, Indian Oi ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1814

B.S. Chauhan and Dilip Gupta, JJ.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 02.08.2005 passed by the Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager of the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. by which he has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1990

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hind Lamps Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-08-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80J and 80J(1)

Reported in : (1991)92CTR(All)204; [1991]190ITR553(All)

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Upadhyaya, Adv.

S.C. Verma, J.1. The controversy involved in the question referred to us is as to whether, on the basis of the profit and loss account submitted by the assessee, the total income of the new unit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2004

Cit Vs. Anand Swarup Aggarwal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-27-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]143TAXMAN119(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Rithik Upadhyaya

R.K. Agarwal J.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for the opinion of this court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2009

Sabar Kheti Udyog Sahakari Mandli Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat a ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-11-2009

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 84, 85, 86, 87, 92, 107, 107(A), 107(1), 107(3), 108 and 109; Agriculture Produce Market Committee Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(3), 119 and 226

Reported in : (2009)2GLR1093

Advocate for Respondent : C.B. Upadhyaya, A.G.P.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The Court has heard this petition on 11-2-2009. After hearing the learned Counsels appearing for the parties, the petition was dismissed mainly for the reasons that the petitioner No. 1-Society is virtually a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1988

In Re: All India Defence Accounts Association

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-12-1988

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(13A), 10(14), 17, 17(1), 17(2) and 17(3)

Reported in : (1988)74CTR(All)41; [1989]175ITR494(All); [1989]43TAXMAN216(All)

Advocate for Respondent : Bharatji Agrawal and ;Vinod Rastogi, Advs.

Om Prakash, J.1. The petitioners, broadly categorised as Central Government employees, employees of Central Government undertakings, bank employees, State Government employees and General Insurance employees, dispute the taxability of various allowances, namely, dearness allowance, city compensatory...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial