Advanced Search Results

Air India Employees Union and Others Vs. Air India Limited and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Sanklecha, J. 1. These petitions are fallout of a merger of Indian Airlines Limited and Air India Limited which was done to make the national carrier more competitive and profitable in the context of open...

Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, Mumbai Vs. Anna Gyanaba Veer

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR142; 2002(2)BomCR431; [2002(93)FLR738]; 2002(3)MhLj64

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Peerzada, Adv.

Nishita Mhatre, J. 1. The writ petitioner has impugned the order of the Labour Court in a complaint filed under Section 28 read with Items 1(a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the...

V.R. Walvekar and anr. Vs. Gopal Narayan MaraThe and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 44

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR418; 2003(4)MhLj478

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Peerzada, Adv. for respondent No. 1

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J. 1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.Perused the records. 2. The petitioners are challenging the judgment and order dated 30-11-1999, passed by the Industrial Court in Revision Application No. 18 of 1997,partly...

Maharashtra Engineering Plastic and General Kamgar Union Vs. Little Ki ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28; Employees State Insurance Scheme Act

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR238; 2005(4)BomCR429; (2005)IILLJ555Bom; 2005(2)MhLj652

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Peerzada and ;B.V. Bukhari, Advs.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The Petitioners had filed a complaint being Complaint No. 564 of 1998. The case of the complainant was that the respondents were employers. As the workman engaged by the employer were not being...

Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. RFC Employees' Union and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9A, 10 and 10(1); Companies Act, 1956; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18A; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1) and 10(1); Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1996; General Clauses Act, 1987 - Sections 6; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 59; Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ939Bom

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Bukhari, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;A.S. Peerzada, Adv., i/b., P.M. Mokashi, AGP for Respondent No. 3

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. This proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has arisen out of an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal rejected an Application filed by the Management, questioning the...

Cosmos Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. General Federation Maharashtra State ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : The Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946; Bombay Industrial Disputes Act, 1938; The Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3 and 56; General Clauses Act; Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 142 and 226

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR877

Advocate for Respondent : A.V. Bukhari, Sr. Counsel, ;Burhan V. Bukhari and ;A.S. Peerzada, Advs.

Khanwilkar A.M., J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties.2. Rule. Mr. B.V. Bukhari waives notice for respondents.3. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent and matter is heard for final disposal.4. This petition takes exception to the judgment...