Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: a k awasthi · Page 1 of about 358 results (0.154 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 2004

Chandra Bhan Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-29-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ351

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Awasthi, Adv. and ;A.G.A.

K.N. Ojha, J.1. Instant Criminal Appeal has been filed against judgment and order dated 25-7-1980 passed by learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Agra, in Sessions Trial No. 656 of 1978, State v. Chandrabhan, under Section 302,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2004

Virendra Nath Ojha Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-02-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servant (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975 - Rule 3; Police Act, 1861; Constitution of India - Article 309; Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rule 20(1); Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Criterion for Recruitment by Promotion) Rules, 1994; Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulation 541 and 541(2); Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 55B

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC674

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Awasthi, Adv. and ;S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was duly selected as a Constable in the Provincial Armed Constabulary (in short 'P.A.C.') along with 179 other candidates. After appointment, he joined duty as a Constable in August, 1994. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2002

Radhey Shyam Vs. Special C.J.M./Prescribed Authority, Kanpur Nagar and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 10, 21, 22 and 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1962

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Awasthi, S.C.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri R. K. Awasthi, learned standing counsel, representing the respondent.2. Petitioner has filed supplementary-affidavit today. In paragraph 2 of the affidavit, it has been stated that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 16 2003

Amarjeet Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-16-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC208; (2004)1UPLBEC57

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Awasthi and ;S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 13.3.1994 passed by Senior Superintendent of Police, Varanasi, respondent No. 3, dismissing the petitioner from service and also the order dated 25/26.10.1995 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2004

Municipal Board, Through Its Executive Officer Vs. Sri Shant NaraIn Pa ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-15-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15(2), 15(3) and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1286; [2005(105)FLR470]; (2005)IILLJ919All

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Ganguli and ;R.K. Awasthi, Advs. and ;S.C.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Shri Rakesh Bahadur learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.K. Awasthi learned standing counsel on behalf of respondent No. 2 are present. No one is present on behalf of respondent No. 1-the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2004

Furqan Ahmad Alias Mana and anr. Vs. Viith A.D.J. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-09-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3 and 21(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1161

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Singh, Adv. and ;R.K. Awasthi, S.C.

Tarun Agarwala, J. 1. The landlord-respondent filed an application under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972 praying for the release of the premises in question for her personal need and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2004

Committee of Management, V.K. Higher Secondary School and anr. Vs. Sta ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-13-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Salaries Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC2892

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Awasthi, Adv. and ;S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Both these writ petitioners are based on same facts and raise similar questions and hence they have been heard together and, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, they are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2006

Ajay @ Monu, Son of Ramdhan (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules - Rule 22(5); Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) (Amendment) Act, 2001

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3326

Advocate for Respondent : Manish Tiwari, ;A.K. Awasthi and ;Naveen Shukla, Advs. and A.G.A.

V.D. Chaturvedi, J.1. This criminal revision is filed against the order dated 20.4.2005 passed by Sri R.S. Chaubey Sessions Judge, Etawah, whereby the learned Sessions Judge rejected the revisionist's application for declaring him as juvenile. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2000

Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-27-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3) and 199; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3886

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A., ;A.K. Awasthi, ;Manish Tewari and ;V.C. Tewari, Advs.

ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Shri A.K. Awasthi, learned counsel for the opposite party.2. The sole contention raised before this Court by Shri Pramod Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicant, is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2004

Beche Lal Vs. Commissioner and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-30-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Dealers (Licencing and Restriction of Hoarding) Order, 1989; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 11, 95A and 96A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules - Rules 31, 32, 33 and 35A; Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 243G

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1605

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Awasthi, S.C.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Heard Shri M. D, Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri R. K. Awasthi, learned standing counsel on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. No one has put in appearance on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial