Advanced Search Results

Tej Pal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Tej Pal

Respondent : State

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 161, 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 364-A

1. Vide impugned judgment and order dated 18.11.1998, appellants Hans Raj and Tej Pal have been convicted for the offence of having kidnapped for ransom Master Wasim, for which offence they have been sentenced to undergo...

Tej Pal Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Tej Pal

Respondent : State of U.P.

Subject : Miscellaneous

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1555 OF2008Tejpal …..Appellant versus State of Uttar Pradesh ….Respondent JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL, J.We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and also learned counsel...

Tej Pal Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Tej Pal

Respondent : State of Punjab

Subject : Land Acquisition

CRM-M No.12426 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-12426 of 2014 Date of decision :21. 04.2014 Tej Pal ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...

Tej Pal Singh Yadav and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpor ...

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Tej Pal Singh Yadav and ors.

Respondent : Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr.

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2003)ACC140; 2003VIAD(Delhi)474; 106(2003)DLT325; 2003(70)DRJ410

S.K. Mahajan, J. 1. This order will dispose of both the above appeals filed by the father and brothers of the deceased for enhancement of compensation for the deaths of Jai Pal Singh Yadav and his...

Tej Pal S/O Sh. Des Raj Vs. the State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Tej Pal S/O Sh. Des Raj

Respondent : The State of Haryana and Others

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.13440 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.13440 of 1993 Date of decision May 14, 2013 Tej Pal s/o Sh. Des Raj ...... Petitioner Vs. The State of Haryana and...

Tej Pal JaIn Vs. State (Water Reso.) and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Appellant : Tej Pal Jain

Respondent : State (Water Reso.) and ors

Subject : Education

1 S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.9712/2011 Tej Pal Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :17. 8.2012 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J.Mr. Harish Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr. LK Purohit, Addl. Government Counsel....

Tej Pal Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Tej Pal

Respondent : State of Haryana and Others

Subject : Land Acquisition

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10178 of 1992 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10178 of 1992 DATE OF DECISION: MARCH20 2014 Tej Pal .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and...

Tej Pal Basra and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Tej Pal Basra and Others

Respondent : State of Punjab and Others

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) LPA No.741 of 2012 ( O&M ) Tej Pal Basra and others .... APPELLANTS Versus State of Punjab and others ..... RESPONDENTS (2) LPA No.907...

Tej Pal and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Tej Pal and Others

Respondent : State of U.P. and Others

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148, 149 and 151 - Order XLI, Rule 1; Court Fee Act, 1870 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3175

ORDERBinod Kumar Roy and S. K. Jain, JJ.1. Miscellaneous Application dated 22.12.1997 filed under Sections 148, 149 and 151 Code of Civil Procedure has been put up for consideration along with the report dated 29.11.1993 of...

Tej Pal Singh Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : Tej Pal Singh

Respondent : State of U. P. and Others

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 4A

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1662

V. M. Sahai, J.1. Heard Sri. S. K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. K. Rai, brief holder for the State of U. P., for the respondents.2. The only point raised by the...