Tej Pal Vs. State of U.P.

Tej Pal vs State of U.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Sep 22, 2014

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1164492

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1164492
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: M.Y. Eqbal and Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Decided On: Sep 22, 2014
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tej Pal

Respondent

State of U.P.

Excerpt

reportable in the supreme court of india criminal appellate jurisdiction criminal appeal no.1555 of2008 tejpal …..appellant versus state of uttar pradesh ….respondent judgmentm.y. eqbal, j.we have heard learned counsel for the appellant and also learned counsel for the respondent state. we have already discussed all the facts and circumstances of the case in criminal appeal nos.1551-1554 of 2008 filed by the state of uttar pradesh and the same have been dismissed by a separate judgment pronounced today.2. so far as the present appeal by tej pal is concerned, separate special leave petition preferred by one of the accused namely narendra has already been dismissed by this court. we also do not find any merit in this appeal filed by accused tej pal which is also dismissed. …………………………….j.[ m.y. eqbal]. …………………………….j.[pinaki chandra ghose]. new delhi september 22, 2014

Full Judgment

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1555 OF2008 Tejpal …..Appellant versus State of Uttar Pradesh ….Respondent

JUDGMENT

M.Y. EQBAL, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and also learned counsel for the respondent State. We have already discussed all the facts and circumstances of the case in Criminal Appeal Nos.1551-1554 of 2008 filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the same have been dismissed by a separate judgment pronounced today.

2. So far as the present appeal by Tej Pal is concerned, separate special leave petition preferred by one of the accused namely Narendra has already been dismissed by this Court. We also do not find any merit in this appeal filed by accused Tej Pal which is also dismissed. …………………………….J.

[ M.Y. Eqbal]. …………………………….J.

[Pinaki Chandra Ghose]. New Delhi September 22, 2014

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2014 Same Parties Tej Pal vs State of U.P. Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge M.Y. Eqbal and Pinaki Chandra Ghose