Advanced Search Results
Mohd. Ibrahim Mohd. SasIn Vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Ibrahim Mohd. Sasin
State of Maharashtra
Nov-04-1986
Criminal
National Security Act
1987Supp(1)SCC32
E.S. Venkataramiah and; M.M. Dutt, JJ.1. Even though two adjournments were given to the State Government no counter-affidavit is filed in this case by the State Government. The petitioner was detained under the National Security Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ibrahim Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Mohd. Ibrahim
State of Nct of Delhi
Nov-27-2012
Narcotics
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 426/2010 Judgment reserved on 22nd November, 2012 Judgement delivered on 27th November, 2012 % MOHD. IBRAHIM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Wadhwa, Adv. versus STATE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ibrahim Vs. State
Delhi
Mohd. Ibrahim
State
Aug-14-1968
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 235, 240 and 243; High Court Rules and Orders; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 516-A and 517
AIR1969Delhi315; 1969CriLJ1377
1. These two appeals (Criminal Appeals Nos. 80-D and 85-D of 1962) are being disposed of together be- cause they arise out of the same trial and have, thereforee, been disposed of by one order by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohd Ibrahim Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand
Mohd Ibrahim
The State of Jharkhand
Aug-07-2013
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6369 of 2013 Mohd. Ibrahim ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ibrahim Ganai and anr. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Mohd. Ibrahim Ganai and anr.
State of J. and K. and ors.
Dec-17-1997
Civil
Jammu and Kashmir Constitution - Section 104; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 133; ;Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1989 - Section 133; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1999J& K20
ORDERSyed Bashir-ud-Din, J.1. In the petition it is averred that petitioners and the Public have access to their agricultural land over a common path way measuring 7 x 110 feet Which has been encroached upon by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShansshia Oil Mills Panruti, Represented by Partner H.S. Mohd. Ibrahim ...
Chennai
Shansshia Oil Mills Panruti, Represented by Partner H.S. Mohd. Ibrahim
The State of Madras Represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Tiruchirapally Divisio
Jul-10-1967
Sales Tax
(1967)2MLJ432
ORDERK. Veeraswami, J.1. Only a single item of turnover among others was in dispute right through and that related to an inter-State transaction. The question was whether it was covered by a declaration in form 'C'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ibrahim Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Mohd. Ibrahim
State of Andhra Pradesh
Sep-25-1992
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 326
1993CriLJ2489
1. P.W. 2 is the person on whose complaint the case was registered as Crime No. 62/88, and after examining witnesses, charge-sheet under S. 307, I.P.C., was filed. After committal, the following charge was framed :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askirshad Ahmad S/O Mohd. Ibrahim Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
irshad Ahmad S/O Mohd. Ibrahim
State of U.P.
Jan-06-2006
Excise
Uttar Pradesh Excise Act - Sections 22, 60, 72 and 72(5)
2006(1)AWC908
Amar Saran, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.2. This revision has been filed against the judgment of the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Shaharanpur dated 10.9.1985 dismissing an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ibrahim Khan and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mohd. Ibrahim Khan and ors.
State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Sep-21-1979
Media and CommunicationCommercial
Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 5(3); Madhya Pradesh Cinema (Regulation) Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 4, 5 and 6
AIR1980SC517; (1979)4SCC458; [1980]1SCR792; 1979(11)LC839(SC)
D.A. Desai, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the order date 27th December 1977 made by the State of Madhya Pra-desh granting a licence for a quasi-permanent cinema to; respondent No.3 Prem Narayan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaji Mohd. Ibrahim Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Haji Mohd. Ibrahim
State of Rajasthan and ors.
Apr-23-2003
Service
Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951- Rule 179
RLW2004(1)Raj198; 2004(1)WLC124
Sunil Kumar Garg, J. 1. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »