Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: in re attorney · Page 1 of about 78 results (0.042 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 19 1925

In Re: Attorney

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : In Re: Attorney

Decided on : Mar-19-1925

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1925Cal1084

C.C. Ghose, J.1. In this case the applicant, who is a solicitor of this Court, applies under Section 10 of the Letters Patent for an order that the respondent, who is also an attorney of this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 1954

In Re: an Attorney

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : In Re: an Attorney

Decided on : Jun-24-1954

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 5 and 13; ;Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 5, 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR1955Cal113,58CWN880

Chakravartti, C.J.1. By an order made on 4-5-1954, P. B. Mukharji, J. and myself directed a Rule to issue on 'Jalan & Co.', ostensibly a firm of solicitors practising in this Court, requiring them to show...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 1951

In Re: Sudhir Chandra Ray Chaudhuri, an Attorney

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : In Re: Sudhir Chandra Ray Chaudhuri, an Attorney

Decided on : Sep-04-1951

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Rent Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1952Cal258,56CWN51

Harries, C.J.1. Two Rules were issued - one on July 26, 1951 and the other on July 27, 1951-by Mitter J. calling upon Sree Sudir Chandra Ray Chaudhuri, an Attorney of this Court, to show cause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 23 1955

In Re: D an Advocate of the Supreme Court

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : In Re: D an Advocate of the Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-23-1955

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 10; Supreme Court Rules - Order IV, Rule 30

Reported in : AIR1956SC102; (1956)58BOMLR510; 1956CriLJ280; (1956)IMLJ85(SC); [1955]2SCR1006

Das, J.1. This Rule was issued by this Court under Order IV, rule 30 of the Rules of this Court after receipt of a report from the Bombay High Court that that High Court had, by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1923

In Re: an Advocate of the High Court

Court : Chennai

Appellant : In Re: an Advocate of the High Court

Decided on : Aug-20-1923

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1924Mad265; 76Ind.Cas.873; (1923)45MLJ639

Walter Salis Schwabe, K.C., C.J.1. Mr. M.A. was called to the Bar by the Hon'bje Society of Lincoln's Inn in January, 1913. He was admitted as an Advocate of this Court under the which includes among...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1934

In Re: an Advocate

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : In Re: an Advocate

Decided on : Jul-30-1934

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1935Cal484,157Ind.Cas.374

Costello, J.1. On 29th December 1933, a complaint was made to the Court under Section 10, Bar Councils Act, by Mr. J.C. Galstaun concerning the conduct of an advocate whom he had instructed to file an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2017

Re:mohit Chaudhary, Advocate Vs. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : Re:mohit Chaudhary, Advocate

Decided on : Aug-17-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE1IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) NO.5 OF2017IN RE : MOHIT CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. A Noble Profession. An Officer of the Court. An Advocate-on-Record having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1923

In Re: Advocate

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : In Re: Advocate

Decided on : Aug-20-1923

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1923)ILR46Bom903

Walter Salis Schwahe, Kt., K.C., C.J.1. A was called to the Bar by the Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn in January 1913. He was admitted as an Advocate of this Court under the rule which includes...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1927

In Re: an Attorney

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : In Re: an Attorney

Decided on : Mar-07-1927

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1927Bom537; (1927)29BOMLR1066

Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. The main facts in this case are concisely and clearly set out in the report of Mr. Justice Blackwell. By agreement between the parties the exhibits on the enquiry before him are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1935

In Re: an Advocate

Court : Allahabad

Appellant : In Re: an Advocate

Decided on : Jan-21-1935

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 155Ind.Cas.1043

Thom, J.1. On January 24, 1934, notice was ordered by this Court to go to Mr. O. to show cause why he should not be proceeded against for professional misconduct.2. For some reasons or other notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial