Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: emperor · Respondent: laxman · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.018 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 12 1936

Emperor Vs. Laxman Jairam

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Laxman Jairam

Decided on : Aug-12-1936

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1937Bom31; (1936)38BOMLR1122; 166Ind.Cas.569

1. [ His Lordship first dealt with the case of Soni and treating her confession as evidence against her confirmed the conviction and sentence passed upon her. The judgment next proceeded to deal with the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1918

Emperor Vs. Madhav Laxman

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Madhav Laxman

Decided on : Apr-03-1918

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1918Bom117; (1918)20BOMLR607

Shah, J.1. The facts relating to this case are briefly these. The accused who are the Kulkarni and the Patil of the village of Bhandiwad were committed to the Court of Session on the 15th August...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1926

Emperor Vs. Malhari Laxman

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Malhari Laxman

Decided on : Dec-01-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1927)29BOMLR186

Patkar, J.1. In this case the accused Malhari Laxman was registered at Deolali as a member of a criminal tribe, on March 25, 1920. By Government Resolution No. 5012, dated May 20, 1921, the Mang Garudis...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 10 1938

Emperor Vs. Ganpat Laxman Kalgutkar

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Ganpat Laxman Kalgutkar

Decided on : Jun-10-1938

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1938Bom427; (1938)40BOMLR820

Wassoodew, J.1. This is an appeal by the Government of Bombay from the order of acquittal passed by the Presidency Magistrate, Second Additional Court, Mazagaon, in a case in which the respondent along with his servant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1926

Emperor Vs. Laxman

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Laxman

Decided on : Sep-01-1926

Subject : criminal

Reported in : AIR1927Bom38

Shah, J.1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate of Poona in respect of an order made by the First Class Magistrate of Poona discharging the accused on the ground that that Court had no...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1926

Emperor Vs. Laxman Alias Babu Baloba Shinde

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Laxman Alias Babu Baloba Shinde

Decided on : Sep-01-1926

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR1292

Shah, J.1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate of Poona in respect of an order made by the First Class Magistrate of Poona discharging the accused on the ground that that Court had no...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1922

Emperor Vs. Laxman Natha

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Laxman Natha

Decided on : Jan-12-1922

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1922)24BOMLR380; 66Ind.Cas.994

Norman Macleod, C.J.1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate of Sholapur asking the High Court to exercise the powers conferred by Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code with regard to an order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1912

Emperor Vs. Ananda Laxman Babaji

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Ananda Laxman Babaji

Decided on : May-25-1912

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR504

1. In this case the accused was convicted by the Second Class Magistrate of Nandgaon for having committed theft under Section 379, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to one month's rigorous imprisonment. Notice was issued by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 1944

Emperor Vs. Laxman Bharmaji

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Laxman Bharmaji

Decided on : Nov-23-1944

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1945)47BOMLR660

Lokur, J.1. This is an application in revision against the petitioner's conviction under Section 134 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and the sentence of a fine of Rs. 100 by the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Bombay....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1912

Emperor Vs. Dattatraya Laxman Sarpotdar

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : Emperor

Respondent : Dattatraya Laxman Sarpotdar

Decided on : Jan-31-1912

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR158

Chandavarkar, J.1. The petitioner asks this Court to hold as ultra vires the proclamation of the District Magistrate of Ratnagiri, prohibiting the dissemination in the said District of pictures or symbols of Bal Gangadhar Tilak. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial