Advanced Search Results
c Vs.r
THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Complainant
Respondent
Nov-19-1995
MRTP
1996(1)IBR155
APPEARANCE:For the complainant Mr. Denzil D' Mello.For the Respondent None.Per Shri S.K. Padhi, Member.This proceeding has been initiated at the instance of a complaint made by "C". Since this application could not be disposed of within...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovind Prasad Dalmiapetitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. West Bengal State Electr ...
Kolkata
Govind Prasad Dalmiapetitioner/ Plaintiff
West Bengal State Electricity Board Respondent /Defendant
Oct-09-2012
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE C.S.No.323 of 1993 Govind Prasad Dalmia Petitioner/ Plaintiff Versus West Bengal State Electricity Board Respondent /Defendant BEEFORE: The Hon’ble Justice Asim Kumar Ray Mr....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWhether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Injunction as Prayed For? Vs. Har ...
Punjab and Haryana
Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Injunction as Prayed For?
Haryana Financial Corporation …respondent
Mar-11-2014
Land Acquisition
Rs.No.315 of 1997 1 IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.03.2014 Rs.No.315 of 1997 Shakti Talwar …Appellant Versus Haryana Financial Corporation …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr.Ajaivir Singh,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
“i) Whether the Plaintiff Firm Is Registered Firm and Raj Kumar Vs. ...
Punjab and Haryana
“i) Whether the Plaintiff Firm Is Registered Firm and Raj Kumar
M/S. Satish Kumar and Brothers Commission Agents.....Respondent
Apr-23-2014
Education
201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 23.04.2014 1. Rs.No.1205 of 1990 (O&M) Food Corporation of India and others .....Appellants V/s. M/S.Satish Kumar and Brothers Commission Agents.....Respondent 2. Rs.No.1206...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask“counsel Would Contend That the Complainant Vs. State of Punjab --re ...
Punjab and Haryana
“counsel Would Contend That the Complainant
State of Punjab --respondent
May-27-2014
FERA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-14925 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2014. Jaswinder Singh @ Golu & others --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askc Vs.r
THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Complainant
Respondent
Dec-09-1996
Right to Information
1997(3&4)IBR201
Briefly stating the facts of the case are that the complainant filed a complaint against the respondent on the allegations that he engaged the respondent to file a case in respect of the theft committed in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Chainrup Sampatrampetitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. Punjab and Sind Bankre ...
Kolkata
M/S.Chainrup Sampatrampetitioner/ Plaintiff
Punjab and Sind Bankrespondent /Defendant
Jul-04-2012
Right to Information
1 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE C.S.No.435 of 2000 G.A.No.727 of 2012 M/s.Chainrup Sampatram Versus Punjab and Sind Bank Petitioner/ Plaintiff Respondent /Defendant BEEFORE: The Hon’ble Justice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask“counsel Would Contend That the Complainant in Vs. State of Punjab - ...
Punjab and Haryana
“counsel Would Contend That the Complainant In
State of Punjab --respondent
Jul-08-2014
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-15470 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2014. Mathura Dass & others --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask“Counsel would contend that as per complainant's Vs. State of Haryan ...
Punjab and Haryana
“Counsel would contend that as per complainant's
State of Haryana --Respondent
Jul-11-2014
Right to Information
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-17222 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.07.2014. Sanjeet --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAcknit Industries Ltd.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Vs. Kolkata Munic ...
Kolkata
Acknit Industries Ltd.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant
Kolkata Municipal Corporationdefendant/Respondent
Jun-28-2012
Education
ORDER SHEET G.A.No.3416 of 2011 W.P.No.74 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ACKNIT INDUSTRIES LTD.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Defendant/Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date :28. h...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›