Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Appellant: complainant · Respondent: respondent · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.048 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 19 1995

c Vs.r

Court : THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA

Appellant : Complainant

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Nov-19-1995

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 1996(1)IBR155

APPEARANCE:For the complainant Mr. Denzil D' Mello.For the Respondent None.Per Shri S.K. Padhi, Member.This proceeding has been initiated at the instance of a complaint made by "C". Since this application could not be disposed of within...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2012

Govind Prasad Dalmiapetitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. West Bengal State Electr ...

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Govind Prasad Dalmiapetitioner/ Plaintiff

Respondent : West Bengal State Electricity Board Respondent /Defendant

Decided on : Oct-09-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE C.S.No.323 of 1993 Govind Prasad Dalmia Petitioner/ Plaintiff Versus West Bengal State Electricity Board Respondent /Defendant BEEFORE: The Hon’ble Justice Asim Kumar Ray Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2014

Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Injunction as Prayed For? Vs. Har ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Injunction as Prayed For?

Respondent : Haryana Financial Corporation …respondent

Decided on : Mar-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Rs.No.315 of 1997 1 IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.03.2014 Rs.No.315 of 1997 Shakti Talwar …Appellant Versus Haryana Financial Corporation …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA Present: Mr.Ajaivir Singh,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 23 2014

“i) Whether the Plaintiff Firm Is Registered Firm and Raj Kumar Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : “i) Whether the Plaintiff Firm Is Registered Firm and Raj Kumar

Respondent : M/S. Satish Kumar and Brothers Commission Agents.....Respondent

Decided on : Apr-23-2014

Subject : Education

201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 23.04.2014 1. Rs.No.1205 of 1990 (O&M) Food Corporation of India and others .....Appellants V/s. M/S.Satish Kumar and Brothers Commission Agents.....Respondent 2. Rs.No.1206...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2014

“counsel Would Contend That the Complainant Vs. State of Punjab --re ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : “counsel Would Contend That the Complainant

Respondent : State of Punjab --respondent

Decided on : May-27-2014

Subject : FERA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-14925 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2014. Jaswinder Singh @ Golu & others --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1996

c Vs.r

Court : THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA

Appellant : Complainant

Respondent : Respondent

Decided on : Dec-09-1996

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : 1997(3&4)IBR201

Briefly stating the facts of the case are that the complainant filed a complaint against the respondent on the allegations that he engaged the respondent to file a case in respect of the theft committed in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2012

M/S.Chainrup Sampatrampetitioner/ Plaintiff Vs. Punjab and Sind Bankre ...

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : M/S.Chainrup Sampatrampetitioner/ Plaintiff

Respondent : Punjab and Sind Bankrespondent /Defendant

Decided on : Jul-04-2012

Subject : Right to Information

1 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE C.S.No.435 of 2000 G.A.No.727 of 2012 M/s.Chainrup Sampatram Versus Punjab and Sind Bank Petitioner/ Plaintiff Respondent /Defendant BEEFORE: The Hon’ble Justice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2014

“counsel Would Contend That the Complainant in Vs. State of Punjab - ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : “counsel Would Contend That the Complainant In

Respondent : State of Punjab --respondent

Decided on : Jul-08-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-15470 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2014. Mathura Dass & others --Petitioners Versus State of Punjab --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2014

“Counsel would contend that as per complainant's Vs. State of Haryan ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Appellant : “Counsel would contend that as per complainant's

Respondent : State of Haryana --Respondent

Decided on : Jul-11-2014

Subject : Right to Information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-17222 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.07.2014. Sanjeet --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:- Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 28 2012

Acknit Industries Ltd.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Vs. Kolkata Munic ...

Court : Kolkata

Appellant : Acknit Industries Ltd.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant

Respondent : Kolkata Municipal Corporationdefendant/Respondent

Decided on : Jun-28-2012

Subject : Education

ORDER SHEET G.A.No.3416 of 2011 W.P.No.74 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ACKNIT INDUSTRIES LTD.Plaintiff/Petitioner/Applicant Versus KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Defendant/Respondent BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL Date :28. h...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial