Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-17222 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.07.2014.
Sanjeet --Petitioner Versus State of Haryana --Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.
Present:- Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Vikas Malik, A.A.G., Haryana.
*** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J This order shall dispose of the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C praying for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case F.I.R.No.313 dated 16.11.2013 under sections 392, 394, 397, 149, 120-B I.P.C and sections 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station, Rai, District Sonepat.
On 19.5.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Counsel would contend that as per complainant's version that there were three young boys who had committed the crime and out of which one was apprehended on the spot, namely, Kapil.
It is further submitted that Kapil had in turn named Kuldeep son of Tej Singh and Jitender son of Mangli Ram as regards their involvement in the commission of crime.
It has been argued that the present petitioner is sought to be implicated only on the disclosure statement of Kuldeep and Jitender and with the aid of Section 120-B IPC.
Counsel argues that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and is, otherwise, willing to join investigation.
Notice of motion, returnable for 11.07.2014.
Lucky 2014.07.14 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM No.M-17222 of 2014 (O&M) -2- In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer.
The petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and he shall remain bound by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”
.
Learned State counsel upon instructions from ASI Phool Kumar would apprise the Court that the petitioner has since joined investigation.
That apart, the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner and as noticed in the notice of motion order, passed by this Court, has gone unrebutted.
Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.
The order dated 19.5.2014, passed by this Court, is made absolute.
Petition disposed of.
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE July 11, 2014.
lucky