Advanced Search Results

Shiva Shankar Verma and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar Through Vigilance ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Special Courts Act, 2009 - Section 15; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2), 13(1)(e); Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18 Rule 4; Evidence Act - Section 35

Dharnidhar Jha, J.- The present batch of four appeals arises out of an order passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Authorised Officer, Patna, on 17.3.2011 under Section 15 of the Bihar Special Courts Act,...

Gayatri Devi and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1634 of 2015 1. Gayatri Devi, wife of Janardhan Singh @ Janardhan Pd. Singh 2. Janardhan Singh @ Janardhan Pd. Singh .... Petitioners Versus 1. State...

Saraf Agencies Private Limited Vs. Kanoria Jute and Industries Limited

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Shivakant Prasad CS No.288 of 2007 Saraf Agencies Private Limited Versus Kanoria Jute and Industries Limited For the plaintiff :...

Nageshwar Choudhary Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 7 and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149, 197, 201, 224, 225, 307, 323, 337, 342, 353 and 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Chandra Mohan Prasad, J. 1. This appeal is against the judgment dated 30th January 2003 of the Special Judge, Vigilance, Bihar, Patna in Special Case No. 62 of 1992 (arising out of vigilance P.S. Case No....

N.K. Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Mridula Mishra, J.1. Common grievance of petitioners in all these writ application relate to inter changeability from super speciality to parent speciality department. Petitioners are mainly aggrieved by the action of the respondents/ Department of Health...

Md. Abdul Sattar Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Property

Ravi Nandan Sahay, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decree of the 3rd Additional Subordinate Judge, Muzaffarpur dated 27th June, 1985, whereby the decree passed by the Munsif dated 8.10.1983 dismissing the...

Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union and ors. Vs. Basant Prasad Si ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Shiva Kirti Singh and Rekha Kumari, JJ.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants as well as the respondents in all these 15 Letters Patent Appeals which have been heard together because common issues of law are...

Dilip Kumar Sinha Vs. Ambika Prasad and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Election

B.P. Sharma, J.1. The present election petition has been filed on behalf of Sri Dilip Kumar Sinha, a loosing candidate for the Assembly Election of Bihar legislative Assembly from 165-Pirpaiti Assembly Constituency held in March 1995,...

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(3), 13, 17(1), 17(2), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 19, 20, 21, 21(3), 22, 22(3), 23, 26, 26(1), 26(2), 31, 31(1), 32, 33, 33(1), 33(3), 34, 35, 37, 37(1), 37(2), 37(4), 38, 38(1), 39, 44(2), 50, 55, 66 and 66(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)

R.L. Aggarwal, J.1. This writ petition arises under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter refereed to as 'the MRTP Act'). The petitioner seeks withdrawal, cancellation and annulment of the Notice of Enquiry dated...

Shanti Devi Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(2)JCR380(Jhr)]

ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parties finally. In this writ petition, petitioner prayed for a direction upon the respondents to reimburse the medical expenses incurred in the treatment of her deceased husband.2. On 15.2.2007, the following...