Advanced Search Results

thengackal Estate Vs. Reethammal

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30

Reported in : 1996ACJ1114; (1996)IILLJ511Ker

Ramakrishnan, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 (for short 'the Act') against the order passed by 2nd respondent, Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (Deputy Labour Commissioner),

Raziyabee Wo Shaikh Sattar Vs. Surrendra So Shivajirao Sangle.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Workmen's Compensation

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. - Section 4 (1) (a), 2 (1) (d) (3) (b), 30

thereby dismissing the claim petition filed by the appellants seeking compensation under section 4 (1) (a) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. 3. This being an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act (to be treated as a second appeal and) … under the Workmen's Compensation Act (to be treated as a second appeal and) substantial question of law under section 30 of the said Act is framed as follows :- Whether the Civil Judge Senior Division and Commissioner for

United India Insurance Company Vs. Dasari Lakshmi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and IndustrialInsurance

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 22 and 30; Workmen's Compensation Rules, 1924 - Rule 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41

Reported in : II(2004)ACC508; 2005ACJ825; 2004(3)ALD176; 2004(2)ALT392; [2004(101)FLR1070]

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, filed by the sole appellant, against R-1 to R-5, under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, questioning certain parts of the adjudications made by and set forth in para 3, infra.2. The Orders in

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Momina Khatum and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 4A, 4A(2), 4A(3), 10, 10(1) and 30; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147 and 147(1)

Reported in : 2008ACJ2734

Nandrajog, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 challenging the award dated 09.06.2004 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Delhi. 2. Vide impugned award respondent Nos.

Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Nirmal Vs. Abdul Sattar

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30 and 30(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 and 110; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 39; Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 66(1)

Reported in : 1996ACJ1156; 1995(1)ALT413; (1995)IILLJ318AP

employer i.e., the Depot Manager, A. P. S. R. T. C., Nirmal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('the Act', for short) against the order No. D/2308/86 dated 24-11-1987 of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Warangal

Achoor Estate Vs. Nabeesa

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4(1) and 30

Reported in : II(1994)ACC491; 1994ACJ607; (1994)IILLJ969Ker

John Mathew, J.1. These are appeals filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, for short 'the Act', against orders of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation (Deputy Labour Commissioner), Kannur, in different

Jaybharat Saw Mill Vs. Babulal Ambalal Sodh-parmar

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4A(3) and 30

Reported in : 1991ACJ793; (1991)1GLR446; (1992)IILLJ186Guj

1. By this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('Act' for short, hereinafter), the appellant has challenged the judgment and award passed by the learned Civil Judge

Gangwani and Co. Vs. Saraswati Wd/O Maniram Banewar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2001ACJ1295; 2001(3)ALLMR370; 2002(1)BomCR223; [2001(90)FLR1100]; (2001)IILLJ1022Bom

question in issue, it is difficult to hold that the Commissioner appointed under Section 20 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, can be called the Court, firstly, because the Workmen's Compensation Act is a special statute enacted by the … Court and his order a judgment and order passed by the single Judge of the High Court under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is a judgment within the meaning of Clause 15 of the Letters Patent

Smt. Kavitha Dilip Patil and ors. Vs. Ananda Gnanu Patil and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2), 167 and 170; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30

Reported in : II(2004)ACC221; 2004ACJ1000; ILR2004KAR461; 2004(2)KarLJ569; (2004)IILLJ637Kant

31.10.2003, and has come up before us.2. M.F.A. No. 1910/97 has been filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short the WC Act) against the judgment and award dated 12.2.97 in WCA:SR:111/95 for enhancing the

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Savita Sen and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCivil

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 30(1)

Reported in : 2004ACJ2134; [2004(102)FLR927]; (2004)IIILLJ250MP; 2004(3)MPHT7; 2004(2)MPLJ445

for decision on the following question of law :--'Whether the third proviso to Section 30(1), of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, requiring the employer to accompany certificate of deposit from the Commissioner for workmen's Compensation of the amount of