Advanced Search Results

Act1: value added tax act 2003 section 84 · Page 1 of about 846 results (0.282 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 28 2014

M/S. Balanoor Plantations and Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-28-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

consequent demand notice. 2.5. Admittedly, the appellants are "registered dealers" as defined by Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short "the Act"). All the appellants together shall be hereinafter referred to as the 'assessees' only. 3. … she placed reliance on the following judgments in D.H.Brothers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax (U.P.) [1992] 84 STC 267 (SC); Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Raja Benoy Kumar Sahas Roy [1957] 32 ITR 466; Union

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2015

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2015

Subject : Service Tax

be regarded as information technology products. Background Facts 4. The Appellant is a registered dealer under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 ( &tilde;DVAT Act') and is engaged in the sale of wide range of electronic items and information … with reference to Entry 20 (2) (b) of Part C of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 captioned 'Computer Terminals'. The Assessee there sought to rely on the definition of the expression 'computers' in the … product, the Appellant has raised the question of deemed acceptance of the determination application of the Appellant under Section 84 (5) read with Section 84 (6) of the DVAT Act and Rule 58(5) of the DVAT Rules. 16.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2018

The State of Karnataka Vs. M/S. Ws Retail Services Private Limited

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-31-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tax Act, 1957 and (v)Karnataka Entertainments Tax, 1958. (b) Relating to assessment/reassessment orders under the provisions of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for the tax period relating to all years commencing from 01.04.2005 upto 31.03.2016 and (c) With respect to … Others reported in [2017]. 100 VST1(Cal), the Calcutta High Court when faced with challenge to the constitutionality of Section 84(1) of the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 which is analogous to Section 63 of the KVAT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Feb 23 2015

Commissioner of Vat Vs. Jupitor Exports

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-23-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. This appeal under Section 81 of Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as “the Delhi VAT Act”), is directed against the order dated 07.01.2014 passed by … of the entitlement and the amount of any refund, the determination of specific questions ST.APPL.10/2014 Page 14 under section 84, the making of general rulings under section 85, and the conduct of audit or investigations shall, for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2023

The Commercial Tax Officer Vs. Neeraja Pipes Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 2010- 11 under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereafter “APGST Act”) and Telangana State Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (hereafter “VAT Act”) 1 Dated 28.09.2021 in WP No.3703/2020 2 and for not lifting attachment order dated … erroneous. The assessee requested to cancel the said demand, since the assessment orders for the year 2001-02 and 2003-04 were revised on 24.04.2005 resulting in excess tax collection; it requested that such excess tax collected be adjusted … the provisions of Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 (hereafter “the RR Act”), under Section 27 of the VAT Act. The revenue had issued assessment orders for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2013

C.T.O.Circle-b,udaipur Vs. M/S Hinger Traders

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-16-2013

Subject : Education

Mr.Vinay Kothari for the respondent. The petitioner-Revenue has preferred this revision petition under Section 84 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, 'Act of 2003') against the judgment and order dated 28th February, 2012 passed by the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2013

C.T.O. Nagaur Vs. M/S Chaudhary Tyres, Degana

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Sep-18-2013

Subject : Education

for Mr.V.K.Mathur for the petitioner. The petitioner-Revenue has preferred this revision petition under Section 84 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, 'Act of 2003') against the judgment and order dated 19.02.2013 passed by the learned Rajasthan Tax

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2023

V.J.Sebastian, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-11-2023

Act 1963 for the year 2002-03 for identical goods and the position now is exemption claimed under VAT Act 2003 for the same product. A perusal of the order of the Commercial Tax Officer reveals that at the … Act. The assessing authority rejected the return and completed the assessment under section 25(1) of the KVAT Act levying tax of 4% under serial number … 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 99 OF 2019 TAVAT 86/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: V.J.SEBASTIAN, PROPRIETOR, SUPER FLANNEL WORKS, PUTHENCRUZ. BY ADVS. S.K.DEVI SRI.SHANMUGHAM D. JAYAN RESPONDENT/S: … 21ST POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 99 OF 2019 TAVAT 86/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: V.J.SEBASTIAN, PROPRIETOR, SUPER FLANNEL WORKS, PUTHENCRUZ. BY … POUSHA, 1944 OT.REV NO. 100 OF 2019 TAVAT 84/2016 OF KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM REVISION PETITIONER/S: