Advanced Search Results
M/s Modi Naturals Ltd Vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Tax Up
Supreme Court of India
Nov-06-2023
Service Tax
Court in case of M.K. Agro Tech (supra). He would argue that the statutory provisions under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and UP VAT Act are distinct and different in all respects. He pointed out that the UP Page … be referred to as the revenue.3. These appeals are at the instance of an assessee, duly registered under Section 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 (for short, ‘the UP VAT Act’) and are … Commissioner, Tax Fixation, Div. - I, Pilibhit passed in terms of Section 28(2)(i) of the UP VAT Act. It is the case of the revenue
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Electric Co Ltd Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-10-2018
Land Acquisition
No.229761714 (Annexure ‘C’), passed by the 2nd Respondent under Section 39(1) read with Section 36(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, for the tax periods April 2009 to March 2010 are ex facie illegal and unsustainable & etc., W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017: … THIS THE10H DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.Nos.58917-58928/2016, W.P.Nos.26349-26360/2017, W.P.Nos.27983-27994/2016, W.P.Nos.27995-28006/2016, W.P.Nos.28796/2016 & 28997 - 29007/2016, W.P.Nos.31159-31170/2016, W.P.Nos.31430-31441/2016, W.P.Nos.33906-33917/2016, W.P.Nos.34001/2016 & 36313-36323/2016, W.P.Nos.35703-35708/2016, W.P.No.36404/2016, W.P.Nos.37148-37159/2016, W.P.Nos.39369-39380/2016, W.P.Nos.46927-46938/2016, W.P.Nos.46927-46938/2016, W.P.Nos.46939-46950/2016, W.P.Nos.53182-53193/2016, W.P.Nos.55050/2016 &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGovernment of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Financ ...
Karnataka
Jan-02-2009
ConstitutionSales Tax/VAT
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(1), 9(2) to 9(4), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to (9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79(1); Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2006; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2007; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008; Karnataka Value Added Tax Rule; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 19, 19(1) and 19(6)
ILR2009KAR633
Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act] and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have … 37.(2) A dealer who fails to report to the prescribed authority a change in circumstances as required by Section 28 shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five thousand rupees.(3) The power to levy the penalties shall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Philips Electronics India Ltd. Reptd. by Its Manager - Corporate Fisca ...
Karnataka
Jan-02-2009
Sales Tax/VAT
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 12(1), 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6)
2009(3)AIRKarR1; AIR2009NOC2187
Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, the Act and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have … 37.(2) A dealer who fails to report to the prescribed authority a change in circumstances as required by Section 28 shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five thousand rupees.(3) The power to levy the penalties shall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhilips Electronics India Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-02-2009
Service Tax
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 3, 4, 9, 9(2), 10, 22, 22(1), 22(5) to 22(9), 23, 28, 29, 29(1), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 32, 33, 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38, 38(3), 39, 40, 42, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 53, 53(4), 55(1), 71 to 77 and 79; Karnataka Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 78(5); Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 19(6)
[2009]20STT314
Writ petitioners are all persons who are dealers as the expression occurs in Section 2(12) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for short, 'the Act'] and also dealers who are registered under Section 22 of the Act.2. Petitioners have … 37.(2) A dealer who fails to report to the prescribed authority a change in circumstances as required by Section 28 shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding five thousand rupees.(3) The power to levy the penalties shall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Assam and ors. Vs. Chhotabhai Jethabhai Patel Tobacco Product ...
Guwahati
Aug-30-2007
Sales Tax/VAT
discriminatory because of the exemption granted to the goods specified in the schedule and taxable under the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003, which are produced and manufactured within the State of Assam, by virtue of Section 5 of the 2001 … or sale therein, which came into force on October 1, 2001, on publication of a notification dated September 28, 2001 in the Assam Gazette (Extraordinary) specifying the said date, in terms of the provisions contained in Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Highways Authority of India vs.m/s Gayatri- Eci (Joint Ventur ...
Delhi
Apr-16-2019
Land Acquisition
fixed as 14th April 2009. Disputes arose between the parties, inter alia relating to: a) Reimbursement of enhanced Value Added Tax (hereinafter referred to as VAT) under Sub-Clause 70.6 of Conditions of Particular Application (hereinafter referred to as 'COPA') … November 2005, the applicable VAT was 12.5% as per entry 2 of schedule V to the Assam VAT Act, 2003. This remained the same throughout the contract period. The statutory provisions relating to the Composition Scheme for Works … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: March 28, 2019 Pronounced on 16thApril, 2019 O.M.P.(COMM) 128/2019 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA … India (hereinafter referred to as „NHAI‟) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Of Karnataka Vs. M/s. Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd
Karnataka
Feb-10-2023
Land Acquisition
ORDERS DATED1012.2015 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 1.3, DVO-31, BENGALURU, FILED UNDER SECTION392) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 R/W SEC.36 OF KVAT ACT2003FOR TAX PERIOD OF APRIL2010TO MARCH2011 IN STRP No.15 OF2022BETWEEN :1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER … BUILDING N.R.ROAD BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENT REP. BY ITS MANAGER (BY SHRI. S.GANESH, ADVOCATE) THIS STRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION651) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX2003AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED1003.2021 PASSED IN STA NOS.88 TO912018 ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Of Karnataka Vs. M/s Redington India Ltd.,
Karnataka
Feb-10-2023
Land Acquisition
ORDERS DATED1012.2015 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 1.3, DVO-31, BENGALURU, FILED UNDER SECTION392) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 R/W SEC.36 OF KVAT ACT2003FOR TAX PERIOD OF APRIL2010TO MARCH2011 IN STRP No.15 OF2022BETWEEN :1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER … BUILDING N.R.ROAD BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENT REP. BY ITS MANAGER (BY SHRI. S.GANESH, ADVOCATE) THIS STRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION651) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX2003AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED1003.2021 PASSED IN STA NOS.88 TO912018 ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Of Karnataka Vs. M/s Spice Retail.ltd.
Karnataka
Feb-10-2023
Land Acquisition
ORDERS DATED1012.2015 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 1.3, DVO-31, BENGALURU, FILED UNDER SECTION392) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 R/W SEC.36 OF KVAT ACT2003FOR TAX PERIOD OF APRIL2010TO MARCH2011 IN STRP No.15 OF2022BETWEEN :1. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER … BUILDING N.R.ROAD BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENT REP. BY ITS MANAGER (BY SHRI. S.GANESH, ADVOCATE) THIS STRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION651) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX2003AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED1003.2021 PASSED IN STA NOS.88 TO912018 ON THE FILE OF THE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »