Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the it act 2000 section 24 · Page 1 of about 2,445 results (0.117 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 03 2016

Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-03-2016

Subject : Right to Information

the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … for its exercise - that, from the people and for the people, all springs and all must exist.” 24. We are compelled to say so as liberty which is basically the splendor of beauty of life and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2007

Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2007

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;

as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondent - NCB and a rejoinder … a substance obtained outside India had been supplied to persons outside India and as such no case under Section 24 of the Act had been made out against the appellant. Elaborating this argument, he has submitted that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2018

L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-2018

Subject : MRTP

primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that 8. protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.2. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of … July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 980/2016 & I.A. 24186/2014 L’OREAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates. Shukla,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2026

Mr. Aashay Harlalka vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-2026

CRIME NO.502/2025 DATED 23.08.2025 (ANNEXURE A) REGISTERED FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/US/ 65, 66 OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000 AND SEC.316, 318(4), 319(2) OF THE BNS BY IMPOSING ANY REASONABLE CONDITIONS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT. … seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.502/2025 registered on 23.08.2025 before the respondent No.1-Police for the offences punishable under Sections 65, 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as IT Act for short) and Sections -3- … that one Akshay Yelmelwar, was anemployee of the respondent No.2-company worked between 24.07.2023 and 06.06.2025. He had resigned from his employment effective from 07.03.2025, which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2018

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-26-2018

Subject : Right to Information

measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to … presentation. (c) Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c The Authority has sufficient defence mechanism, as Page 240 of 567 onnected matters explained in Slide 30. It has even taken appropriate protection measures as demonstrated in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2010

Aruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2010

Subject : Right to Information

without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act, 2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information … “Certifying Authority” means a person who has been granted a licence to issue a (Electronic Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2010

Mascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another

Court : Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2010

Subject : Right to Information

“Certifying Authority” means a person who has been granted a licence to issue a (Electronic Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) “Controller” means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of … without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act,2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 2018

Skullcandy Inc vs.shri Shyam Telecom & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-2018

Subject : MRTP

primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … 7. case.8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.3. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of … July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 979/2016 & I.A. 24578/2014 SKULLCANDY INC ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2012

A.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-11-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 5(1)(5), 8(3)(4), 8(6)(8), 71, 26(1), 42; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 420, 511, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 121, 121-A, 489-A, 489-B, 302, 304, 307, 308, 327, 329, 364A, 384 to 389, 392 to 402, 467, 489-A, 489-B, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 467, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 - Sections 4, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 173; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(NDPS) Act. - Sections 15 to 24, 25-A, 27-A, 29; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 to 5; Arms Act, 1959. ; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 ; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 ; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ; Explosives Act, 1884; Antiquities and Arts Treasures Act, 1972 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ; Customs Act, 1962 ; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 ; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 ; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 ; Emigration Act, 1983 ; Passports Act, 1967 ; Foreigners Act, 1946 ; Copyright Act, 1957 ; Trade Marks Act, 1999 ; Information Technology Act, 2000 ; Biological Diversity Act, 2002 ; Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 ; Environment Protection Act, 1986 ; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 300-A

of 2010 on the file of the Adjudicating Authority under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 to hear the matter afresh after giving adequate opportunity to the petitioner in O.C.No.58 of 2010.W.P.No.13421 of … under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994Paragraph-13Offences under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000Paragraph-14Offences under the Emigration Act, 1983Paragraph-15Offences under the Passports Act, 1967Paragraph-16Offences under the Foreigners Act, 1946Paragraph-17Offences under the Copyright … a decision of a learned Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.24444 and 24445 of 2010 dated 18.11.2010 {R.Devadoss vs. Deputy Director}. It was held in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2011

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963

Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … 18th Dec 2008 PUNJABI ALBUM Bottle Wargi Ravinder Grewal 18th Dec 2008 PUNJABI ALBUM Dont Mind Aman Riar 24th Dec 2008 HINDI FILM JAANE TU YA IMRAN KHAN, 12.12.08 JAANE NA GENELIA DSOURZA, MANDHRI PADHNIS, AIYAZ KHAN

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial