Advanced Search Results
Dr. Rini Johar and Anr. Vs. State of M.P. andors.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-03-2016
Right to Information
the relevant evidence. The crime was registered on 27.11.2012 under Section 420, 34 IPC read with Section 66D IT Act, 2000 against the named accused persons. The offence was to the effect that though the alleged accused persons obtained … for its exercise - that, from the people and for the people, all springs and all must exist.” 24. We are compelled to say so as liberty which is basically the splendor of beauty of life and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Dec-03-2007
CriminalNarcotics
Indian Companies Act, 1956; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 12, 24, 29, 37 and 67; ;Control Substances Act; Information Technology Act - Sections 8 and 79; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 116
2008(221)ELT20(SC); (2008)2SCC294; 2007AIRSCW7902; 2008(2)SCC294; (2008)1SCC(Cri)346; 2008(1)Crimes26; 2008(2)KCCR865;
as the two companies which were intermediaries were protected from prosecution by Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. An affidavit in reply has also been filed on behalf of the respondent - NCB and a rejoinder … a substance obtained outside India had been supplied to persons outside India and as such no case under Section 24 of the Act had been made out against the appellant. Elaborating this argument, he has submitted that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.
Delhi
Nov-12-2018
MRTP
primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … case. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that 8. protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.2. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of … July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 980/2016 & I.A. 24186/2014 L’OREAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates. Shukla,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mr. Aashay Harlalka vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Apr-16-2026
CRIME NO.502/2025 DATED 23.08.2025 (ANNEXURE A) REGISTERED FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/US/ 65, 66 OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2000 AND SEC.316, 318(4), 319(2) OF THE BNS BY IMPOSING ANY REASONABLE CONDITIONS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT. … seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.502/2025 registered on 23.08.2025 before the respondent No.1-Police for the offences punishable under Sections 65, 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as IT Act for short) and Sections -3- … that one Akshay Yelmelwar, was anemployee of the respondent No.2-company worked between 24.07.2023 and 06.06.2025. He had resigned from his employment effective from 07.03.2025, which
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJustice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India
Supreme Court of India
Sep-26-2018
Right to Information
measures. CIDR being a computer resource is notified to be a “Protected System” under Section 70 of the IT Act, 2000 by the Central Government on 11.12.2015. Anyone trying to unlawfully gain access into this system is liable to … presentation. (c) Writ Petition (Civil) No.494 of 2012 & c The Authority has sufficient defence mechanism, as Page 240 of 567 onnected matters explained in Slide 30. It has even taken appropriate protection measures as demonstrated in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAruna Kashinath Vs. Gmail.Com and Another
Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi
May-28-2010
Right to Information
without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act, 2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information … âCertifying Authorityâ means a person who has been granted a licence to issue a (Electronic Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) âControllerâ means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMascon Global Limited Vs. Gmail.Com and Another
Cyber Appellate Tribunal New Delhi
May-28-2010
Right to Information
âCertifying Authorityâ means a person who has been granted a licence to issue a (Electronic Signature) Certificate under section 24; (m) âControllerâ means the Controller of Certifying Authorities appointed under sub-section (1) of section 17. Clause (n) of … without exhausting the alternative remedy of approaching the Controller of Certifying Authorities or the Adjudicating Officer appointed under the IT Act,2000.? (ii) Whether the ingredients made in the appeal amounted to an offence under the provisions of the Information
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSkullcandy Inc vs.shri Shyam Telecom & Ors
Delhi
Nov-12-2018
MRTP
primarily on the ground that intermediaries are exempt from liabilities under Section 79 of the Information and Technology Act, 2000. However, this Court finds that in the present plaint there is an allegation that the applicant- defendant who … 7. case.8. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Plaintiff submits that protection of Section 79(1) of the IT Act cannot be granted to Defendant No.3. In fact Section 79(1) is subject to Section 79(2) and 79(3) of … July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 979/2016 & I.A. 24578/2014 SKULLCANDY INC ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.Kamarunnisa Ghori. Vs. the Chairperson Prevention of Money Launderin ...
Chennai
Jul-11-2012
Criminal
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 5(1)(5), 8(3)(4), 8(6)(8), 71, 26(1), 42; Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 420, 511, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 121, 121-A, 489-A, 489-B, 302, 304, 307, 308, 327, 329, 364A, 384 to 389, 392 to 402, 467, 489-A, 489-B, 412, 413, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 467, 471, 472, 473, 475, 476, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488; Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 - Sections 4, 5; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 173; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances(NDPS) Act. - Sections 15 to 24, 25-A, 27-A, 29; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3 to 5; Arms Act, 1959. ; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 ; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 ; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ; Explosives Act, 1884; Antiquities and Arts Treasures Act, 1972 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 ; Customs Act, 1962 ; Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 ; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 ; Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 ; Emigration Act, 1983 ; Passports Act, 1967 ; Foreigners Act, 1946 ; Copyright Act, 1957 ; Trade Marks Act, 1999 ; Information Technology Act, 2000 ; Biological Diversity Act, 2002 ; Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 ; Environment Protection Act, 1986 ; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 ; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 300-A
of 2010 on the file of the Adjudicating Authority under Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 to hear the matter afresh after giving adequate opportunity to the petitioner in O.C.No.58 of 2010.W.P.No.13421 of … under the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994Paragraph-13Offences under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000Paragraph-14Offences under the Emigration Act, 1983Paragraph-15Offences under the Passports Act, 1967Paragraph-16Offences under the Foreigners Act, 1946Paragraph-17Offences under the Copyright … a decision of a learned Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.24444 and 24445 of 2010 dated 18.11.2010 {R.Devadoss vs. Deputy Director}. It was held in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuper Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another
Delhi
Jul-29-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 4 - Section 20 (c); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 79; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51(a)(i); Engraving Copyright Act, 1734; Telegraphs Act 1863; Specific Relief Act, 1963
Copyright Act ("DMCA") whereby the liability of the defendants shall be exempted by operation of Section 79 of IT Act, 2000. g) The agreements or the assignments which are placed on record by the plaintiff are defective. The said … 18th Dec 2008 PUNJABI ALBUM Bottle Wargi Ravinder Grewal 18th Dec 2008 PUNJABI ALBUM Dont Mind Aman Riar 24th Dec 2008 HINDI FILM JAANE TU YA IMRAN KHAN, 12.12.08 JAANE NA GENELIA DSOURZA, MANDHRI PADHNIS, AIYAZ KHAN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »