Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: the indian penal code 1860 section 481 · Page 1 of about 111 results (0.041 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 1952

Ramnath Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-20-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 480, 481 and 481(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228

Reported in : AIR1953All59

- effect of non-compliance - Sections 480 and 481 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 228 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - cognizance taken under Section 480 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - omission to record proceedings in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1985

Babasaheb Krishna Karande and Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 481; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 379 and 461

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR716

- theft - Section 481 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 34, 379, 411 and 461 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - raid conducted and stolen articles found - appeal against conviction under Sections 379 and 461 read with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2001

Moreshwar Savey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-12-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 11, 11(1), 145, 161, 169, 173(8), 190, 193, 226, 227, 228, 233, 234, 234(1), 397, 460 and 482; General Clauses Act 1897 - Sections 10 and 21; Delhi Special Police Establisment Act, 1946; Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114, 120A, 120-B, 141, 147, 149, 153-A-B, 201, 295, 295-A, 297, 323, 332, 336, 337, 338, 342, 379, 391, 390, 392, 394, 395, 397, 406, 408, 409, 427 and 505; Ayodhya Act, 1993; Limitation Act 1908; Companies Act - Sections 630; Constitution of India - Article 216, 233 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1765

in the Schedule below :SCHEDULE1. Case relating to Crime No. 198/92 under Sections 153A, 153B and 505 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S. Ram Janam Bhumi, Ayodhya, district Faizabad, State v. Sri Ashok Senghal and others.10. Before the Court of … (Moreshwar Savey v. State of U.P. and another) the revisionist is to be charged with offences punishable Under Sections 147, 153A, 153B, 295, 295A, 505 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to … IPC.(35) Crime No. 322 of 1992 under Section 392, IPC.(36) Crime No. 481 of 1992 under Sections 147, 336, 323, 506, IPC.(37) Crime No. 482

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2004

The Intelligence Officer and ors. Vs. Arshad Saleem Khan and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psyscotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sectons 42, 41(2), 50, 53, 53A, 53(3), 66 and 67; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 174 and 175

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4496; ILR2004KAR3855

Matched in: Advocate Vishwanath Shendge and ;Dinesh Kumar, Advs. in Crl.A. 481/02 and ;Sham B. Keshwani, Sr. Counsel, ;J.P. D'Souza, ;Ayaz A. Khan and ;S.M. Udikeri, Advs. in Crl.A. 1388, 1389 and 1502/01 Ashok R. Kalyan Shetty, Adv. in Crl.A. 481/02, ;Viswanath Shendge and ;Dinesh Kumar, Advs. in Crl.A. 1388, 1389 and 1502/01

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 2013

Anil Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-28-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

dated 07.10.1998 and 09.10.1998, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi has convicted them under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC”) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs. 500/- … Sharma, APP for the State with Insp. Ravindra Ahlawat, PS Karol Bagh, New Delhi AND + (2) CRL.A. 481/1998 SARAVJEET SINGH Through ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2016

Shyam Singh Vs. State rep. By the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ce ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Apr-21-2016

Subject : Education

239, Section 161(3) - Copy Right Act, 1957 - Section 51, Section 51(B) read with Section 63 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 420, Section 481, Section 483 and Section 486 - Trade Mark Act, 1999 - Section 103

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1990

Kothari and Sons and Others Vs. N. Subramanian, Income-tax Officer, Ce ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245D(1), 245D(1A), 245D(4), 245E, 245F, 245F(1), 245F(2), 245F(4), 245H, 245H(1), 245-I, 245M, 276C, 277 and 278; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 193, 196 and 420

Reported in : [1992]196ITR82(Mad)

as it may think fit to impose, immunity from prosecution for any offence under this Act or under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or under any other Central Act for the time being in force and also from … it. 26. It was also observed by the Supreme Court (at page 481 of 118 ITR) that a casual perusal of Chapter XIXA convinced the … of together. The question is whether an assessee who had filed an application before the Settlement Commission under section 245C of the Income-tax Act the terms of which include grant of immunity from prosecution under section 245H

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1923

The King Emperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-26-1923

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1924Cal257

examine, in the first instance, the terms of Section 34. In the Indian Penal Code as enacted in 1860, Section 34 was expressed in the following terms:When a criminal act is done by several persons, each of such … Justice Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty to the first count and guilty to the second count. The Jury returned a … of Lord Watson in Robinson v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. (1892) A.C. 481 and of Lord Macnaghten in Narendranath v. Kamal Bisini (1896) Cal. 563.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 1923

Emperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-26-1923

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 81Ind.Cas.353

examine, in the first instance, the terms of Section 34.74. In the Indian Penal Code, as enacted in 1860, Section 34 was expressed in the following terms :When a criminal act is done by several persons, each of … Justice Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty to the first count and guilty to the second count. The Jury returned a … Lord Watson in Robinson v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. (1892) App. Cas. 481 at p. 487 : 61 L.J.P.C. 79 : 67 L.T. 505 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2013

Balvinder Singh Sandhan Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-26-2013

Subject : Education

25.6.2011 (Annexure P-1).registered at Police Station Karnal Civil Lines District Karnal under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short) and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that … DAG, Haryana. Respondent No.2 in person. **** SABINA, J. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.481 dated 25.6.2011 (Annexure P-1).registered at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial