Advanced Search Results

Neku Khan and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 149, 323, 342, 366, 376 and 458

Reported in : AIR2009SC1954; JT2009(1)SC194; 2009(1)SCALE371; (2009)11SCC86; 2009AIRSCW1581

appellant No. 1 Neku Khan for offence punishable under Sections 376, 147, 323/149, 342, 458 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') The other appellants were convicted for offence punishable under Section 147, 323/149, 342, 458

State of Rajasthan Vs. Gulab Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 307, 397, 411, 414, 458 and 460

Reported in : AIR2008SC3100; RLW2008(4)SC3105; 2008(10)SCALE44; (2008)8SCC139; 2008AIRSCW5200; (2008)3SCC(Cri)433

Jodhpur, altering the conviction of the respondent for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC') to Section 307 IPC. However, the conviction under Sections 458 and 460 IPC were

Siba Prasad Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 376, 458 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107

Reported in : 91(2001)CLT594; 2001(I)OLR323

Criminal - Rape - Unreliable Evidences - Benefit of Doubt - Section 458, 376, 342 and 505 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Appellant committed rape on prosecutrix - FIR lodged - Wearing apparel seized and prosecutrix sent for

Bhoja Babu Salian Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 467, 457, 458, 461, 472 and 419; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 446; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 514

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR165

the Court.10. Application dismissed. Criminal - bail bond - Sections 467, 457, 458, 461, 472 and 419 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 446 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 514 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - proceedings initiated against

Shankar Shaiyyam Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilElection

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 21, 21(1), 21A, 36, 36(1) 39, 39(1), 40(1), 40(2) and 130; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Gram Panchayat Ke Sarpanch Tatha Up-Sarpanch, Janapad Panchayat Tatha Zila Panchayat Ke President Tatha Vice-President Ke Virudh Avishwas Prastav) Niyam, 1994; Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Election Petition, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 303, 304B, 305, 306, 312 to 318, 366A, 366B, 373 to 377, 395 to 398, 408, 409 and 458 to 460

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT466; 2001(3)MPLJ375

Chapter XVI, Sections 395 to 398, 408, 409, 458 to 460 of Chapter XVII and Chapter XVIII of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) or under any Law for the time being in force for the prevention of adulteration … Sarpanch is removed from his/her post by vote of no-confidence, is he/she entitled to contest in the bye-election.5. Section 17 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') deals with the

Mahendra Kumar Vs. Director General Prisons and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Rules 9 and 14; Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Act - Sections 14; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 121 to 140, 216A, 302, 303, 311, 328, 332, 364, 386, 387, 388, 389, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2255; 2005(3)WLC694

392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 413, 455, 458, 459 and 460 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.Unless they have undergone (one fourth) of the sentence including remission and the Superintendent of Jail recommends the … 29.03.2005 has been annexed as (Annexure-R1). It is then pleaded that since the petitioner was also convicted under Sections 395/396 IPC; parole to him would be prohibited under Rule 14 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole

Lehna Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149, 302, 324 and 458; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 354(3), 360, 361 and 366; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 367(5); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1974; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 562

Reported in : JT2002(Suppl1)SC577; 2002(1)SCALE273; (2002)3SCC76; [2002]1SCR377

and not planned assaults - In peculiar circumstance of the case, imprisonment for life is more appropriate. - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Section 376: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & Asok Kumar Ganguly, JJ] Rape Non-mention of name of accused in F.I.R. … committingoffences punishable under Sections 302 458 and 324 of the Indian PenalCode 1860 (in short 'IPC'), was found guilty and accordingly convicted.Corresponding sentences imposed were … accusedhas been treated to be a trespasser in his own house, for holding himguilty of offence punishable under Section 458 of IPC. There is nodiscussion whatsoever as to how ingredients of that Section are present.4. In reply, learned

Rasheeda vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Crime No.458/2023 of Karippur Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner include those under Section 336 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, apart from Section 199A(1), and 199A(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act,1988 (for short, ‘the Act’).2. According to the

Pammu @ Parmeshwar Swami. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 458, 307; The Arms Act, 1959 - Section 27 ;

on 22.10.1994. Accused Raju Nikam was convicted under Sections 458 and 307 of IPC and Section 27 of Indian Arms Act. The present appellant Pammu @ Parmeshwar was convicted as described aforesaid.3. Brief facts of the prosecution … rate, the dealer remains liable to pay interest at a higher rate, penal rate under section 8 (1) from the date when the tax became … dated 14.03.1996, delivered by the then 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhopal in ST No.274/93 convicting the accused-appellant under Section 458 of IPC sentencing him to R.I. for 2 years.2. Admittedly, there were four accused persons in all. One … not be established beyond reasonable doubt. It is the cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence that there is a long gap between "may be true" and

Mohammad Umar Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 458, 468 and 471; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC223; 1986(26)ELT724(MP)

be relied--Needs corroboration--No evidence connecting petitioner to offence--Conviction not justified--Quashed--Central Excises and Salt Act (1 of 1944), Section 9--Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), Sections 458, 471. - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Section 306 :[Dalveer Bhandari & Harjit Singh Bedi,JJ]