Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rasheeda vs State of Kerala

Rasheeda vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 12, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1327551

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/5260/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rasheeda

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....under section 199a of the act requires, as its primary ingredient, the commission of offence by a minor. it was also observed that the prosecution against the guardian of the minor under section 199a of the act can be initiated only after an entry is made in the general diary regarding the offence allegedly committed by the minor. the corollary of the said finding is that when no such entry has been recorded in the general diary, obviously the minor cannot be said to have committed an offence. in the absence of commission of an offence by the minor under the motor vehicles act, 1988, the offence under section 199a of the act cannot be attracted.6. as far as section 336 of ipc is concerned, in the absence of anymaterial to show that the minor had driven the vehicle or committed an offence under the act, certainly the nature of the allegations raised in the case cannot be attributed to the petitioner. hence, the prosecution against the petitioner in the above referred crime is an abuse of the process of court.7. accordingly, all proceedings in c.c.no.1207/2023 on the files of thejudicial first class magistrate-i, manjeri, against the petitioner is hereby quashed. this crl.m.c is allowed as above. sd/- bechu kurian thomas judge amv/15/07/2024 appendix of crl.mc 5260/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a1 true copy of the fir dated 04.07.2023 in crime no. 458 of 2023 of karippur police station, malappuram district. annexure a2 certified copy of the final report alongwith memorandum of evidence dated 05.07.2023 in crime no. 458 of 2023 of karippur police station, malappuram district. true copy

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 5260 OF 2024 CRIME NO.458/2023 OF KARIPUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.1207 OF 2023 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-I,MANJERI ............................ PETITIONER/ACCUSED : RASHEEDA, AGED 38 YEARS W/O. AYUB, CHIRAKANDATHIL HOUSE, CALICUT AIRPORT P.O, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-, PIN - 673 647. BY ADVS. P.C.MUHAMMED NOUSHIQ JAHANA SHERIN.K RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS/STATE : 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031. 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER KARIPPUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-, PIN - 673 647. SMT.SREEJA V (PP) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J ......…............................................. Crl.M.C.No.5260 of 2024 …................................................ Dated this the 12th day of July, 2024

ORDER

Petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.1207/2023 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Manjeri, which arises out of Crime No.458/2023 of Karippur Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner include those under Section 336 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, apart from Section 199A(1), and 199A(2) of the Motor Vehicle Act,1988 (for short, ‘the Act’).

2. According to the prosecution, the accused had, on 04.07.2023,

permitted a minor to ride a scooter bearing registration No.KL-10/BA-8402, in a rash and negligent manner, endangering the life and personal safety of the general public, thereby committing the offences alleged.

3. I have heard Sri.P.C.Muhammed Noushiq, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned public prosecutor, upon instructions submitted that, though a Social Background Report (SBR) has been submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board, no entry of the crime has been recorded in the General Diary.

5. In the decision in Sharafudheen vs. State of Kerala [2024 KHC

online 522], this Court had observed that the offence under Section 199A of the Act requires, as its primary ingredient, the commission of offence by a minor. It was also observed that the prosecution against the guardian of the minor under Section 199A of the Act can be initiated only after an entry is made in the General Diary regarding the offence allegedly committed by the minor. The corollary of the said finding is that when no such entry has been recorded in the General Diary, obviously the minor cannot be said to have committed an offence. In the absence of commission of an offence by the minor under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the offence under Section 199A of the Act cannot be attracted.

6. As far as Section 336 of IPC is concerned, in the absence of any

material to show that the minor had driven the vehicle or committed an offence under the Act, certainly the nature of the allegations raised in the case cannot be attributed to the petitioner. Hence, the prosecution against the petitioner in the above referred crime is an abuse of the process of Court.

7. Accordingly, all proceedings in C.C.No.1207/2023 on the files of the

Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Manjeri, against the petitioner is hereby quashed. This Crl.M.C is allowed as above. sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/15/07/2024 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5260/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR DATED 04.07.2023 IN CRIME NO. 458 OF 2023 OF KARIPPUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ANNEXURE A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT ALONG

WITH MEMORANDUM OF EVIDENCE DATED 05.07.2023 IN CRIME NO. 458 OF 2023 OF KARIPPUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. TRUE COPY

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial