Advanced Search Results

Harjinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 193, 221(1), 223, 300 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B, 148, 149, 302, 307, 342 and 440

Reported in : AIR1985SC404; 1986CriLJ831; (1985)87PLR103; 1984(2)SCALE996; (1985)1SCC422

offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 342 and 440, all read with Sections 149, 148 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959.4. During the investigation, the complainant Harjinder Singh and … case be read as evidence in the other.2. The short point involved in this appeal is whether under Section 223 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 it is permissible for the Court to club and consolidate the

A.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 6, 6(3), 8(1) and 19; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1, 21, 25, 81, 105, 123, 145 and 157; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; APPS - Sections 8; Commission of Inquiries Act, 1962; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 106, 106(2) and 155; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 108; Ku Klux Klan Act, 1871; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 6, 34, 52A, 76 to 106, 135, 147, 148, 149, 201, 202, 203, 204, 216, 217, 221, 299, 300, 302, 304, 304A, 307, 332, 408, 420, 452, 499, 500 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 37, 39, 40, 41, 43, 46, 46(1), 46(2), 46(3), 129 to 132, 132(1), 132, 132(2), 133, 134, 149, 151, 152, 153(3), 154, 154(1), 154(2), 154(3), 155, 156, 156(1), 156(3), 1

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754

Penta and Nekkanti Palutla villages of Yerragondapalem mandal, Prakasham District, by registering a case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC) against the police personnel who participated in the alleged encounter; to initiate proceedings for … - (written submissions dated 4.3.2008 of Mr. V. Raghunath, Advocate for APCLC, in W.P. Nos. 7906/2000, 14475/02 and 440/03)3. The lesson for the MHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) is thus clear: it should advise state governments that

Ramakant Rai Vs. Madan Rai and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 440; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : AIR2004SC77; 2004(1)ALD(Cri)75; 2004CriLJ36; [2004(2)JCR28(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl2)SC344; 2003(8)SCALE243; (2003)12SCC395; 2004(1)LC429(SC)

father of Sachidanand and Rasbehari. Accused-Modan Rai was charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') for committing the murder of deceased and other three were charged by application of … 302 read with Section 34 of IPC, All the four accused persons were also charged in terms of Section 440 IPC for committing mischief having made preparation to cause hurt.2. The date of occurrence is 11.5.1984. The dispute

Chubby Ekwealcoh Vs. V.A.K. Sekar, Asstt. Collector of Customs, Bombay ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 313, 323, 324, 342, 395, 436, 440, 452, 493, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 202, 202(1), 203, 204(1), 208, 209 and 313; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, B(C), 21, 23, 28, 36, 36A, 36D, 36D(1), 42, 43 and 50(1)

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2238

provisions - Sections 34, 149, 313, 323, 324, 342, 395, 436, 440, 452, 493, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 8 (c), 23 and 28 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Harish Dwarkadas Gandhi Vs. G.B. Yadav and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 148, 149, 302, 324, 440 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200 and 321

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR331; 1988(18)ECC287

refused.15. Petition dismissed. Criminal - criminal conspiracy - Sections 120B, 148, 149, 302, 324, 440 and 452 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 200 and 321 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) issued process without examining … Therefore, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence charged them for offences punishable under S. 120B Penal Code, read with Sections 8(c), 20, 23, 25, 28, 29 and 30, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotronic Substances Act, 1985 and Sections 135(1)(a)(b)

Jarnail Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173, 202, 223, 300, 319, 319(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 302, 307, 342, 440 and 447; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR2003SC4081; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)52; 2003CriLJ2307; JT2003(3)SC590; 2003(3)SCALE685; (2003)9SCC328; [2003]3SCR460

having committed offencespunishable under Sections 302, 307, 342 and 440, all read with Sections149, 148 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25 and27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The complainant Harjinder Singh, who wasappellant before the Supreme … Sessions Judge, Karnal, havebeen summoned to face trial in Sessions Case No. 167 of 1999 for theoffence under Sections 148, 302, 307 read with Section 149 of the IndianPenal Code (IPC). The order has been upheld by

S.V. Ramesh Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its Principal Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1964 - Section 4, Section 12, Section 12 read with Section 89, Section 89, Section 124 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 161, Section 21 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1881 - Section 124(1) - Alleged misconduct - … Puthenkavu N.S.S. Karayogam and Kalabharati Advertising v. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania).” Further, the Apex Court in (2004) 6 SCC 440; 2011(5) SCC 435; (2012)5 SCC 242 and AIR 2014 SC 88 has held as under:- Captain Sube Singh

The State of Karnataka vs Chandrashekara @ Chandru

Court : Karnataka

Case No.343 of 2014 acquitting the accused-respondent No.1 of the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 376(2)(i)(n) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter for brevity referred to as "IPC"), under-3- Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 … In the case of Jafarudheen and others -v- State of Kerala reported in (2022) 8 Supreme Court Cases 440, at paragraph No.25 of its judgment, the Hon’ble Apex Court was pleased to observe as below:“25. While dealing

E.V.Loganathan vs State Represented by, the Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B-C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (IPC), the petition in Crl.OP.No.439 of 2025 has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.2. Apprehending arrest in connection with … Government Advocate, (Crl.side)COMMON ORDERApprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.89 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B-C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, (IPC), the petition in … MADRASDATED: 23-01-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 439 & 440 of 2025 E.V.Loganathan Petitioner(s) (in both cases) Vs The State of Tamilnadu,

Wajul Haque & Ors. vs the State (Govt of Nct Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No.440/2023 dated 12.08.2023 registered at PS.: Mehrauli under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 27/02/2026 (Annexure B), whereby … SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 13.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR No.440/2023 dated