Advanced Search Results

Rajesh Kumar Kohli Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

As a matter of fact, PW1 who was the Vigilance Officer of NIC from January, 1992 to March, 2003, is silent on this aspect in his examination in chief and in crossexamination he admitted that one of … Corporation was not a non-existent and fictitious firm. By the impugned judgment the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act. Since the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act, the Appellant has been prejudiced

Anil Maheshwari Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

As a matter of fact, PW1 who was the Vigilance Officer of NIC from January, 1992 to March, 2003, is silent on this aspect in his examination in chief and in crossexamination he admitted that one of … Corporation was not a non-existent and fictitious firm. By the impugned judgment the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act. Since the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act, the Appellant has been prejudiced

Arvind Kumar Sharma Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

As a matter of fact, PW1 who was the Vigilance Officer of NIC from January, 1992 to March, 2003, is silent on this aspect in his examination in chief and in crossexamination he admitted that one of … Corporation was not a non-existent and fictitious firm. By the impugned judgment the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act. Since the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act, the Appellant has been prejudiced

Vinod Kumar Bhutani Vs. State Thr. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

As a matter of fact, PW1 who was the Vigilance Officer of NIC from January, 1992 to March, 2003, is silent on this aspect in his examination in chief and in crossexamination he admitted that one of … Corporation was not a non-existent and fictitious firm. By the impugned judgment the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act. Since the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act, the Appellant has been prejudiced

Kunwar Vijay Juneja Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

As a matter of fact, PW1 who was the Vigilance Officer of NIC from January, 1992 to March, 2003, is silent on this aspect in his examination in chief and in crossexamination he admitted that one of … Corporation was not a non-existent and fictitious firm. By the impugned judgment the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act. Since the learned Trial Court has invoked Section 106 Evidence Act, the Appellant has been prejudiced

K. Viswanathan and Others Vs. Arulmighu Aadhi Solaiammal

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of recovery of possession and damages by confirming the judgement and decree dated 19.09.2007 made in O.S.No.5819 of 2003 and passed by the Hon'ble I Asst. City Civil Court, Chennai.) 1. The defendants have preferred this second … rejected. 10. The second contention put forth by the appellants' counsel is that the notice of termination under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act is bad in the eyes of law and the plaintiff at the

Murray and Co. Rep. by Its Partner S. Sujan Gangadhar Vs. Appellate Au ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9 and 49; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Rent Control Act; Life Insurance Corporation Act; Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction of Rent Recovery) Act, 1973 - Sections 5; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 2000; Electricity Supply Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 162 and 309; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Rules, 1971

Reported in : (2008)4MLJ639

the enhanced rent. Even for the period when the discussions were going on for renewal during November, December, 2003 and January, 2004, the petitioner has been paying rent regularly and the same was accepted by the second … 4(2) of the Act, and therefore, the challenge is not in respect of the termination notice issued under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act.2(i) That apart, it is the case of the petitioner that the impugned

Gold Medal Rep. Sole Proprietor, Mohd Ali Arifi (Died) and ors. Vs. Sm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106 and 106(3); ;Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 99

Reported in : 2004(5)ALT542

had drawn the attention of this Court to a Judgment in S.A. Nos. 147, 148 and 176 of 2003, delivered by this Court on 26-09-2003, wherein, the provisions of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act … a curable irregularity?b) Whether a suit for eviction of defendants can be instituted without service of notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, particularly when the respondent - plaintiff had earlier issued Ex-A5 suit notice

Smt Rudravva W/O Channabasappa Morab Vs. Smt Suma W/O K Purandarshetty

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

106 of the Transfer of Property Act has stood amended with effect from 31.12.2002 vide Act 3 of 2003 of the Parliament. Sub Section of 3 of Section 106 of amended Act, a notice under Sub Section … against his wife for eviction.3. A legal notice dated 04.01.1999 was served on the defendants on 6.01.1999 under Section 106 of The R.S.A.No.84/2007 7 C/W R.S.A.No.85/2007 Transfer of Property Act through RPAD. In spite of receipt of the

K.B.Mujitha Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON2506- 2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DCS WP(C).No. 14514 of 2013 (L) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED165.2013 FILED … that exemption could be granted only on production of a certificate of title from the Land Tribunal under Section 106 B of the Act.4. This Court in Rajeev v. District Collector [ 2014 (4) KLT209 has held that