Advanced Search Results

Yogesh Mallick Vs. Adelaide Afonso

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR341

of the said Act, the said Authority is not a Civil Court in the narrow sense contemplated in the Code of Civil Procedure, taut an Administrative Tribunal, and as such, not subject to the revisional jurisdiction of the … 1950 Nag 14, deals with the authority appointed under the Payment of Wages Act and the Division Bench had held that in the scheme of … Kamat, J. who dealt with it at the time of admission made it subject to the maintainability qua Section 46 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968. Further, presumably under the

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Cipla Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contract labour Act - Sections 7 and 10; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sectionss 2, 2A, 10, 33(A & C), 33C(2); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 46; Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 10, 30 and 32

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR171; (1997)ILLJ933Bom; 1997(1)MhLj201

to follow logically from it. Such a mode of reasoning assumes that the law is necessarily a logical code, whereas every lawyer must acknowledge that the law is not always logical at all'. In Shama Rao v. … their services with a view to depriving them of permanent status and wages and other benefits. It was contended that such employment continued till about … reply, contended that Schedule 'M' to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act cannot be equated with the requirements of Section 46 of the Factories Act inasmuch as the Factories Act is mainly for the welfare of the workmen and

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Cipla Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1996)98BOMLR727

to follow logically from it. Such a mode of reasoning assumes that the law is necessarily a logical code, whereas every lawyer must acknowledge that the law is not always logical at all.In Shama Rao v. Union … their services with a view to depriving them of permanent status and wages and other benefits. It was contended that such employment continued till about … reply, contended that Schedule 'M' to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act cannot be equated with the requirements of Section 46 of the Factories Act inasmuch as the Factories Act is mainly for the welfare of the workmen and

Sayyed Mohammed Naushad Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statement of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 13 was recorded as contemplated under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused Nos.1, 3, 6 and 6 filed their statements under Section 313(5) of the … undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years … unlawful meetings to make the Indian Government insecure and to spoil the unity of the Nation. Further, to wage war against India, the accused persons collected arms and manufactured the ammunitions, conspired and possessed the arms, illegally,

Mr.fakir Ahmed Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statement of the accused Nos.1 to 6 and 13 was recorded as contemplated under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The accused Nos.1, 3, 6 and 6 filed their statements under Section 313(5) of the … undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years … unlawful meetings to make the Indian Government insecure and to spoil the unity of the Nation. Further, to wage war against India, the accused persons collected arms and manufactured the ammunitions, conspired and possessed the arms, illegally,

Harjinder Singh Vs. Punjab State Warehousing Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25F, 25G, 25H and 25M; Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 - Sections 23 and 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 6N and 6P; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Indian Factories Act; Payment of Wages Act; Payment of Bonus Act; Workmen's Compensation Act; Employees Insurance Act; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act; Shops and Commercial Establishments Act; Land Reforms Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115; Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 - Rules 77 and 78; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 15 to 18, 32, 38, 38(1), 39, 39A, 41, 43, 43A, 46, 226, 227 and 311; Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Staff Groups C and D Service Regula

Reported in : JT2010(1)SC598; 2010(1)SCALE613

recorded the following conclusions:(1) Amendment by Act 46 of 1999 with effect from 1-7-2002 in Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot and does not affect in any manner the jurisdiction of the High Court under … Labour Court') in Reference No. 43 of 1996 and directed that in lieu of reinstatement with 50% back wages, the appellant herein shall be paid Rs. 87,582/- by way of compensation.3. The appellant was employed in the

Central Provident Fund Commissioner and anr. Vs. S.K. NasiruddIn Beedi ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A

the notification intended to apply the provisions of the Act with effect from July, 1966, to December, 1976. Code No. DR/1365 was allotted to the respondent's establishment. The respondent replied that the beedi industry was not covered … 1985, to May 3, 1993, during which period the respondent claimed not to have made deduction from the wages of the home workers employed through contractors for manufacture of beedi because of the pendency of litigation on … be the provident fund and allied dues payable by the respondent under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter … issued to the recovery officer for recovery of a sum of Rs. 46,17,538.20, which was determined to be the provident fund and allied dues payable

B. Usha W/O Vishwanath S.V. and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Sec ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Education Act, 1983 - Sections 7(1), 46, 67, 67-A, 68, 69, 80, 94 and 146(3); Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975; Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Rules; Provident Fund Act; Indian Penal Code; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(2)KarLJ565; 2008(1)KCCRSN81; 2008(1)AIRKarR490; 2008LabIC(NOC)340(Kar)

wages payable to them as per the government norms and as stipulated in the grant-in-aid Code [for short, the code]; that the effect of the impugned orders passed by the government is only to retain the services of … quashed.14. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of the court to Sections 7(1)(g) read with Section 46 of the Act and submits that the state and its officers have no role in the appointment of

Saurashtra Majoor Mahajan Sang Vs. Una Taluka Khedut Sahakari Khand Ud ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 85; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25M, 25N and 25-O

Reported in : (1995)1GLR580

be limited in some way as, for instance has been done in the case of second appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure, and under some Rent Acts in some States. Ordinarily, again, revisional jurisdiction is analogous to … Government renders its decision, we direct that the workmen may be paid wages at the rate of 50% subject to adjustment, if need be in … was contended that the aforesaid proposed action to be taken was illegal change as per the provisions of Section 46(2) and 46(4) of the Act. 4. In view of the aforesaid position, the petitioners prayed that the employers

Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., through its Vice President (HR) Vs. Dush ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the employees were working in such Department. Even if it is assumed on the basis of cost code debiting the salary of the employees in the Utility Department to the Polyester Department that such employees were … Department, which was not involved in the functioning of production, but the wages of the employees were drawn or debited to the activities of Polyester … leave and holidays, other than those specified in items 6 and 7 in Schedule I. Sub-section (4) of Section 46 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act provides that no employer shall make any change in any industrial matters