Advanced Search Results

Annu Verma and ors. Vs. Maheshwar Prasad Verma,

Court : Patna

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 30; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 64, 230, 280 and 281; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Rules 14 and 15

15.7.1990. In this connection, learned Counsel for the petitioners-plaintiffs has further referred to Section 64 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to submit that the Power of Attorney dated 4.6.1990. Exhibit-8, referred to in the Will dated 15.7.1990, Exhibit-1

Priyamvada Devi Birla (Since Deceased) Vs. Madhav Prasad Birla (Since ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 6, 8, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2) and 15D; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 62, 211, 213, 214, 218, 263, 283 and 283(1); ;Probate and Letters of Administration Act - Section 64

Reported in : AIR2006Cal6

under Section 263 while caveatable interest is adjudged on the grounds mentioned in Section 283 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). To be more precise under Section 263 of the said Act … of the deceased' employed in Clause (c) of Section 283(1) of the said Act. Upon comparative study of Section 64 of Probate and Letters of Administration Act (since repealed) the above Section, and Section 61 of the Court

Ganganapalli Moorthanna Vs. Ganganapalli Chinna Ankiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 6; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 159; Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 64 and 65

Reported in : AIR1975AP97

not invalidate 'will' - held, will and trust are enforceable. (ii) Enforceability of trust - Section 159 of Succession Act, 1925 - testatrix gifted some property included in trust - disposal of part of property did not made trust … other Privy Council decision in Hem Chand v. Pearey Lal. 69 Ind APP 137 = (AIR 1942 PC 64). In that case a charitable trust was created under a will and it was void for uncertainty. It

Prof and Dr. D. Venkayya Chowdary Vs. Paruchisti R. Katrak

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63, 213, 276, 278 and 301; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64

Reported in : 2006(3)ALD173; 2006(2)ALT456

the said civil miscellaneous appeals.5. O.P. No. 134 of 1996 was filed under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for brevity 'the Act'), O.P No. 140 of 1996 was filed under Sections 213 and 276 of the … and also Bank of India, Museum Branch, Mumbai.89. The so-called letter (Ex.A-2) was not established, as contemplated under Section 64 of the Indian Evidence Act. A letter can be received in evidence and can be proved either by

O.S. Ramaswamy Vs. Personal Assistant (G) to the Collector of Madras S ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 - Sections 59, 59(1), 59(3), 59(4), 59(5) 61(4), 64(4) and 64(5); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 317; Revenue Recovery Act

Reported in : AIR2007Mad105; 2006(5)CTC541; (2007)1MLJ301

six months from the date of exhibition of the inventory as required by Section 317 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.7. In our case, we have already referred to the fact that Probate was granted on 08.02.1990. We have … upon the applicant to amend the valuation. Where amendment is made, Sub-section (4) of Section 59 as also Section 64, Sub-section (4) of the Act will operate. If such amendment is not carried out by the applicant, the

Manek Dara Sukhadwalla Vs. Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the remedy of filing an Application for revocation of the probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 15. Learned Counsel then pointed out the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of G. Gopal … sentences and observations here and there. 29. In State of Orissa Vs. Sudhnashu Sekhar Misra (AIR 1968 SC 64), a Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows: "A decision is only an authority for

Dhananjay Waghray (Died) a/P Smt. Manjula Waghray Vs. Controller of Es ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 21 and 64(1); Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 7

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD151; [1998]234ITR276(AP)

- domicile - Sections 21 and 64 (1) of Estate Duty Act, 1953 and Section 7 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal justified in holding that deceased was not domiciled in United State of

Vinodchandra Sakarlal Kapadia Vs. State of Gujarat .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of List III of Seventh Schedule to the Constitution and a concurrent subject, the Central legislation namely Indian Succession Act, 1925 must hold the field and any prohibition in the State enactment inconsistent with the general principles of the … O) If the landlord intends to sell any land, he must apply to the tribunal in terms of Section 64 which may thereafter determine the reasonable price, and the offer has to be made in terms of Section

Chapman Vs. Chapman

Court : House of Lords

Subject : Land Acquisition

to sanction the scheme either under its general jurisdiction or under section 64 (1) of the Settled Land Act, 1925. Argument was heard in Chambers, but judgment was delivered in open Court on 30th July. The learned Judge … vice versa, though this jurisdiction was generally so exercised as to preserve rights of testamentary disposition and of succession. Equally, there is no doubt that from an early date the Court assumed the power, sometimes for that

Parmeshwar Prasad (Since Deceased) Lord Northbrook and Others Vs. Stat ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

This judgment shall dispose of the Probate Petition filed by the petitioners under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate on the basis of the Will dated 30.10.1985 read with Codicil dated 7.11.1985. This … a citation issued by himself, and shall certify such publication to the District Judge who issued the citation.” 64. Mr. Ganju, the learned senior counsel, on the strength of the aforesaid statutory provisions has placed reliance on