Advanced Search Results

The Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay Vs. Vasantlal Fulchand ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1938Bom360; (1938)40BOMLR497

of action against the other debtors. Isaacs & Sons v. Salbstein (1916) 2 K.B. 139 followed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very … assignee cannot afterwards proceed against the lessees, and he relies on Scarf v. Jardine (1882) 7 App. Cas. 345 and Morel Brothers & Co., Limited v. Westmorland (Earl of) (1903) 1 K. B. 64, affirmed : (1904)

In Re: BenjamIn Guy Horniman

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of CourtCriminal

Reported in : AIR1944Bom127; (1944)46BOMLR94

57 Mad. 831 and Chandan Mall Karnani v. Sardari Lal Thapar [1937] 1. Cal. 345, followed. - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT (39 OF 1925), Section 63: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Will Validity - Deceased, was a very

Pavunambal and ors. Vs. Shanmugam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Section 15(1)(a), 6, 6(3), 8, 9, 19; Indian Evidence Act - Section 91, 92, 68, 114; Indian Succession Act - Section 59, 30

that the Will in question was not only executed and attested in the manner required under the Indian Succession Act. 1925 but it should also be found that the said Will was the product of the free violation of … and on the death of the 1st Plaintiff Muthammal, 24/135th share will devolve upon her heirs as per Section 15(1)(a) of the Hindu Succession Act viz., son Shanmugam (2nd Plaintiff), daughters Lakshmi Ammal and Rajambal (Defendants 9

Kumud Lall versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2026] 5 S.C.R. 301

to what extent.Headnotes†Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - ss.13(7), 2(b)(v) - Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - ss.38(12), 2(5)(vi) - Succession Act, 1925 - s.306 - Legal Representatives Suits Act, 1855 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Ord. 22, r.4 … co-exist. Nonetheless, in view of the preceding discussion and the[2026] 5 S.C.R. 345 Kumud Lall v. Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through Lrs and Othersstatutory framework … heirs. On notice, both wife and son filed applications4 under Order XXII5 Rule 16 and 47 read with Section 1518 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) and Section 229 of 1986 Act, praying to drop

Anjan Chakraborty Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

which is capable of being so disposed of by him in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 defines a Will to mean the legal declaration of the intention … word ‘allotment’ and the legal implication thereof. He has relied upon 1999 Volume 1 Calcutta Law Times page 345 (Smt. Kanta Devi Agarwal & Ors.v.State of West Bengal & Ors.) and 2014 Volume 1 Calcutta Law Journal

B.K. Babu Rao (Died) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. A. Jayalaxmi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Rent Control Act; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; Hindu Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 1 - Order 9, Rules 8 and 9

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD65

capable of giving evidence. In addition, it has to satisfy the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. In order to assess as to whether the Will has been validly executed and is a genuine document, … in the case which was dismissed on 6-6-1994. Against which they preferred a rent appeal bearing R.A. No. 345/ 94 which was also dismissed and it became final.After the dismissal of the said rent appeal they have

Jangir Singh and ors. Vs. Gurdev Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 60; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 73; Evidence Act - Sections 63, 67 and 68

Reported in : (2004)137PLR479

prove that will was not only executed and attested in the manner it is required under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short 'the Succession Act') but it should also be shown that the Will was the result of … are grand sons of Gurmukh Singh filed Suit No. 91 of 19.2.1980/T 345 of 28.8.1980 for declaration and permanent injunction to the effect that they … M.M. Kumar, J.1. (9th March, 2004) - This is defendant's appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity the Code) challenging the judgment and decree passed

Shyamal Kanti Guha (D) Through Lrs. and ors. Vs. Meena Bose

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : India Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 88 and 119; Indian Succession Act, 1865

Reported in : AIR2009SC1194; 2008(4)AWC3245(SC); (2008)4CALLT16(SC); JT2008(6)SC626; (2009)2MLJ104(SC); (2008)8SCC115

partition suit is maintainable but subject to declaration that respondent is confined to life interest only - INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925. Section 222: [S.B. Sinha &Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Will Testator executed two registered Will first on 26.8.1987 and the … subservient, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by; provided that; provided, answerable for. Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corporation 345 Mo. 650, 136 S.W. 2d 289, 302 (See Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition at page 1278)8. The Will

Asstt. Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Smt. Mrunalinidevi Puar of Dhar

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)106ITD541Indore

Act so in order to find out its true meaning aid is necessarily to be taken from Indian Succession Act 1925 in which "executor" is defined as "a person to whom the execution of the last will of the … ITR (SC) 59 & 65 & CIT v. James Anderson 51 ITR 345 (SC). To overcome this lacuna, certain sections in chapter XV were introduced … in all these appeals.4. The Hon'ble High Court further noted that the appeal filed by the revenue under section under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act against an order, dated 27/10/98, passed by I.T.A.T. in W.T.A.

Nilendu Sen Vs. Pratip Kumar Sen

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60, 61 and 68

Reported in : (1993)2CALLT394(HC)

over 5 years since the execution of the Will in English language. She was governed by the Hindu Succession Act and bequeathed all her properties both movable and immovable in an outside jurisdiction of this Court in favour … hand we could only say that the execution never fail foul of Section 61 of the Succession Act, 1925.62. According to the Privy Council dictum as laid down in the case of Harmess and Anr. v. Hinkson … relied on the case of Kuppayammal v. Ammal Animal, ILR 22 Madras 345. Their Lordships in the said case held that it is the obligation