Advanced Search Results

Multivahuji Vs. Kalindivahuji and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 222, 213, 227, 268, 273, 276, 280, 281, 283, 284, 288, 294, 295, 298 and 307; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 10, 115 and 151 - Order 19, Rule 2; Evidence Act - Sections 4, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44

Reported in : AIR1994Guj42

has acted absolutely within its jurisdiction and no jurisdictional error is pointed out to this Court.12. The Indian Succession Act, 1925 broadly divides succession into intestate and testamentary succession. The provisions of the Act dealing with testamentary succession are … Suit, the provisions of Indian Succession Act such as Ss. 227, 273, 294 and 307 will be rendered meaningless. He submitted that under Section 9 … ORDERS.D. Shah, J.1. This Civil Revision Application, under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is directed against the order below Exs. 150 and 152 in

Janardan Jena Vs. Sara Alias Saraswati Dei

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 266 to 268, 294 and 295; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 1991(II)OLR525

An interesting question whether amendment is permissible in respect of an application for grant of probate under Indian Succession Act, 1925 (in short 'the Act') is involved in this revision appli- cation.2. Facts giving rise to the application are … Code first. Conspectus of provisions contained in Secs. 266 to 268 and 294 makes it clear that the Code has application to the proceedings in … proceedings in relation to grant of probate and letters of administration, save as otherwise provided in the Act. Section 295 makes it further clear that moment there is contention in proceedings for grant of probate and letters

Chiranjilal Shrilal Goenka (Deceased) Through Lrs. Vs. Jasjit Singh an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 211(1), 217, 222, 223, 224, 227, 273, 276, 280, 294, 295 and 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2, 2(11), 9 and 33 - Order 22, Rule 10; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 8

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT13(SC); 1993(2)BLJR1193; JT1993(2)SC341; 1993(2)SCALE146; (1993)2SCC507; [1993]2SCR454; MANU/SC/0496/1993

Code. 12. Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act (Act 39) of 1925 for short 'the Succession Act' provides right to the executor to obtain … under Order 22 Rule 10 or legatee under a Will, are legal representatives.11. Section 3(f) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 defines 'heirs' means any person, male or female who is entitled to succeed to the property of … such probate have been granted. The further details are not necessary for the purpose of this case. Under Section 294 it shall be the duty of the court to preserve original Wills. Section 299 gives right of appeals

P.P. Sharma Vs. Smt. Swaran Lata

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 268, 276, 280 and 281; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : 150(2008)DLT328; 2008(102)DRJ627

and order of this Court dated 2.3.2005 in Probate Case No. 34/1988 under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for the reasons set out in the petition? OPPII. To what relief, if any, is the petitioner entitled? … Manmohan, J.1. Appellant has filed two appeals being FAO(OS) Nos. 7 and 294 of 2007 for setting aside the orders dated 18th November, 2006 and 23rd July, 2007 in I.A. No.

Tukaram Gangaram Awhad Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

this order is stayed for 8 weeks from 30th March, 2016 to enable the appellant to file Appeal. Succession Act, 1925 Section 63, Section 68 Declaration and Injunction Trial Court dismissed Suit for declaration and injunction in respect of room, … the case of Gaiv Dinshaw Irani and Ors. vs. Tehmtan Irani and Ors., reported in (2014) 8 SCC 294. He submitted that the judgment passed by the learned trial Court is correct is to be upheld. 7.

Mahadeo Ramchandra Vs. Damodar Vishwanath and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 89

Reported in : AIR1957Bom218; (1957)59BOMLR478; ILR1958Bom21

we take, the appeal must fail and be dismissed with costs.14. Appeal dismissed Indian Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), Section 89 - Direction by testator to dispose of his residuary estate, according to discretion of executor and as … that 'the bequests of residue under the will and codicil' were void under Section 89 of the Indian Succession Act and accordingly he passed a decree directing that the plaintiffs do recover possession of the documents and scripts … L.R. 48 I.A. 69 Gibbs v. Rumsey (1813) 2 V. & B. 294 A.-G., New Zealand v. N.Z. Insurance Co. [1937] A.I.R. P.C. 8 and

Ramzan Ali Vs. Mt. Satul Bibi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1948All244

considered by a Full Bench in the year 1931, in Radha Mohan Datt v. Abbas Ali 18 A.I.R. 1925 All. 294 where it was held that a proceeding; to set aside an ex parte decree was distinct … nature of a suit, for example, under the Guardians and Wards Act, Provincial Insolvency Act and the Indian Succession Act etc., and those no doubt amounted to a ''case decided', The word 'case' according ( to him was … Malik, J.1. This is an application in revision under Section 115, Civil P.C. 1908 (Act V of 1908) by one Ramznn Ali,

Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. versus Suresh Chand and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.339

u/s.53A of TP Act, which deals with Part Performance. Headnotes† Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - s.54 - Succession Act, 1925 - s.63 - Evidence Act, 1872 - s.68 - Respondent no.1/plaintiff filed suit no. 613/1997 for possession, mesne … possession of the defendant No.1. • That the Will has not been proved in accordance with law. • Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is not attracted if the possession of the property is not … 1973. He further contended that the plaintiff had earlier filed OS No. 294/1996 wherein he admitted that the father, Shri Kundan Lal was the owner

Shanmugha Mudali Vs. Kumaraswami Mudali

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1925Mad870

Kirtti (1919) 10 L.W. 155 and Nagappa Pillai v. Arunachalam Chetty A.I.R. 1925 Mad. 281, are not of much help, as there is not much … given. But the cases cited in the arguments show that it was regarded as a case where the success depended not on mere chance but also on some skill. If so the case does not help us. … an offence, it must be one punishable under Section 294-A of the Indian Penal Code. This section and Act V of 1844 are both founded on the terms of 42 Geo. III-C. 119 and 4 Geo. IV-C.

Shanmuga Mudaliar Vs. Kumaraswami Mudali

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 90Ind.Cas.420

given. But the cases cited in the arguments show that it was regarded as a case where the success depended not on mere chance but on some skill. If so, the case does not help us. So … punishable under Section 294A of the Indian Penal Code. This section and Act V of 1844 are both founded on the terms of 42 Geo. … at which the public were invited to join and pay, within the meaning of the English Acts or Section 294-A of the Indian Penal Code. In other words, it is not that every lottery constitutes an offence, but