Advanced Search Results

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

unit at Dhanora has committed gross violation of the provisions of the mandate of the Seeds Act, 1966, Seeds Rules, 1968, Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 and the provisions 2 of the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale … (Control) Order, 1983 and the Maharashtra Cotton Seeds (Regulation of Supply, Distribution, Sale and Fixation of Sale Price) Rules, 2010 and that they are having licence for the storage and sale of such seeds in the State

The State Government of Madhya Pradesh vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Seeds Act.” 13. It is also stated on behalf of respondent no.1 that Rule 3(c) of the Seeds Rules, 1968 (hereafter „the Seeds Rules‟) indicates that one of the statutory functions of the Central Sub-Committee is to “send

Gene Campaign . Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

have the right to save seed for sowing in the next season, which a patent-based regime of GM seeds will effectively deny. This choice is a fundamental right and must be retained as such for better farming … from the CIB&RC would attract appropriate legal action under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules, 1971, made under the said Act Writ Petition (Civil) … Points for Consideration: ............................................................................................ 134 Legal Framework:......................................................................................................... 136 Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (EP Act, 1986): ............................................ 146 1989 Rules: .................................................................................................................... 147 Regulatory Framework: .............................................................................................. 156 Constitutional Court and the Environmental Rule of Law: ............................... 168 Public Trust … para 3.3 and submit a report with recommendations to GEAC. 8.7 On 02.02.2016, the sub-committee appointed by GEAC convened its first meeting and in that

JaIn Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111

Reported in : 1987(29)ELT753(Del); ILR1985Delhi164

in Item 8 Appendix 10 (1978-79). Similarly for 1978-79 entry No. 8 Clause 3 is of soyabean oil seeds and edible variety is under Ogl (Appendix 10) while for industrial purposes soyabean oil is also included at … Metal Corporation. Madras 1972 Sc 935. In that case appellant applied in 1968 for license for stainless steel in December, 1968. But by the time … helpful if Anand, J. was also with us, as he has passed a detailed referring Order. Indeed,the statutory Rules and Order of the Punjab High Court,Vol, V. as applicable to Delhi High Court, make the following provision … of the Act is absolute. There is no scope for importing the rule of means read at all. Either goods are prohibited or not. If

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Gwalior Oil Mills

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1986]62STC299(MP)

is neither practicable, nor necessary for the assessee to keep two categories of raw material, i.e., the oil seeds separately and to maintain separate and distinct accounts with regard to the oil produced out of these two … discharge of this obligation and particularly in view of Rule 52 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'), read with Section 26 of the Act, the assessee

Brooke Bond India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2 and 8(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 17 and 37

Reported in : 1984(3)ECC107; 1984(15)ELT32(AP)

the business of selling among other items 'Coffee-Chicory Mixture'. The activities of the petitioners consist of purchasing coffee seeds, roasting and grinding them and preparing coffee powder out of those seeds by mechanical process involving consumption of … is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder. The expressions 'Curing', 'Excisable goods', 'Factory' and 'Manufacture' are defined in Section 2 of the Act … relevant provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and the Rules made thereunder. The expressions 'Curing', 'Excisable goods', 'Factory' and 'Manufacture' are defined

Deputy Commissioner (C.T.) Vs. G. Govindaraju Chettiar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1980]46STC341(Mad)

only have been made under Section 4-A read with Rule 23 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules. Any order under Section 4-A is also subject to an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and thereafter

Milak Brothers Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130E; Exports Control Order, 1968; Agricultural Produce Cess Act, 1940; Punjab Sales Tax Act; Tariff Act, 1934; Customs Tariff Act, 1975;

Reported in : AIR1990SC2256; 1991(31)ECC198; 1991(51)ELT204(SC); JT1990(4)SC508; 1990(2)SCALE727; 1991Supp(1)SCC71; [1990]Supp2SCR141; 1991(1)LC193(SC)

This separates the skin of the groundnut and on removal of the skin it becomes white. Thereafter, the seeds are put on running tables and picked, according to uniform sizes, with the aid of an electric eye … groundnut kernels', does not fall within the purview of Exports Control Order, 1968 and its export is allowed without any licensing formalities.(6) It has been … not come to an end. [105C]. Rule 19 of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Rules, 1961 framed under the Act provides that where a tenure-holder dies before the publication of the general notice

Rafel Del Riyo Managing Director Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

PASHA, SR. COUNSEL APPEARED FOR SRI N.S KINI, ADVOCATE) AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AND SEEDS INSPECTOR, FARMER’S COMMUNICATION CENTER, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT KAGINELE, BYADGI TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-581106 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP ) … Crl.P.No.102512/21 The Apex Court in the afore-extracted judgment was interpreting Insecticides Act, 1968 , provisions of which are in pari materia with that of the … penalty. Section 19(a) directs any person indulging in acts contrary to any provisions of the Act or the Rules would become liable for prosecution under the 10 Crl.P.No.102512/21 Act. Section 21 deals with offences by companies. Therefore, … Penalty.-If any person- (a) contravenes any provision of this Act or any rule made thereunder; or (b) prevents a Seed Inspector from taking sample under … the life of the seed expired on 18- 02-2021, a show cause notice is issued to the

Anand S/O. Amareshappa Jalihal vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Whether the entire proceedings get vitiated on account of prejudice and violation of Section 16 of the Act?14. Seeds were collected from a dealer by the complainant. The dealer is accused No.3. The sample was collected or … (Emphasis supplied)The Apex Court in the afore-extracted judgment was interpreting Insecticides Act, 1968 , provisions of which are in pari materia with that of the … penalty. Section 19(a) directs any person indulging in acts contrary to any provisions of the Act or the Rules would become liable for prosecution under the Act. Section 21 deals with offences by companies. Therefore, the directors … …19. Penalty.-If any person-(a) contravenes any provision of this Act or any rule made thereunder; or(b) prevents a Seed Inspector from taking sample under this