Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.
Gujarat
Mar-20-2006
Civil
Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4
(2006)2GLR952
read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing of … the purposes of Chapter XII relating to accidents. Sections 114 and 115 of the Railways Act read with Section 113 thereof (all in Chapter XII) confer powers on the Commissioner of Railway Safety and the Railway Board respectively
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmal Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Guwahati
Apr-09-2003
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78 and 79; Constitution of India - Article 226
Matched in: Advocate G.N. Sahewalla, Sr. Adv. B. Sharma, SC, Railways and B. Das, SC, CBI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Through G ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Feb-13-2014
MRTP
of the respondent for being its transported to Khapri, as required under proviso to Section 65 of the Railways Act, 1989, the claim for compensation was liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the learned Technical Member by his order dated … the judgment rendered in the case of Union of India v. Jugal Kishore Khandelwal “ AIR 1988 Ori. 113. 3. After considering the material available on record and hearing both the sides, the learned Technical Member of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Through G ...
Mumbai
Feb-13-2014
MRTP
of the respondent for being its transported to Khapri, as required under proviso to Section 65 of the Railways Act, 1989, the claim for compensation was liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the learned Technical Member by his order dated … the judgment rendered in the case of Union of India v. Jugal Kishore Khandelwal “ AIR 1988 Ori. 113. 3. After considering the material available on record and hearing both the sides, the learned Technical Member of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-02-2001
CivilLimitation
Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 71, 82-A, 106, 106(3) and 124-A; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1) and (1-A), 15, 16, 17, 17(2) and 23; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17(1) - Schedule - Article 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B; Central Excise and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991; Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Act, 1962; Customs Tariff Act
2002ACJ992; AIR2001Bom310; 2001(3)ALLMR400; 2001(4)BomCR239; (2001)4BOMLR725; 2001(3)MhLj479
writ petition for the reliefs prayed for, and must necessarily seek a remedy under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 for adjudication of such a claim for refund.2. The facts of the case, which are not in dispute, … booked 248 rakes for carrying coal to Gurla. The routes on which these wagons were transported include a section of Central Railway, viz., Katni-Singrauli. In exercise of powers under Section 71 of the Railways Act. 1989, the … apply and section 17(1)(c) of the Limitation Act, read with Residuary Article 113 of its Schedule, would be applicable in such cases. It is, therefore,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askk.sivaraman Vs. p.sathishkumar
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-2020
Land Acquisition
briefly note the position of law regarding the date relevant for the determination of compensation payable under the Railways Act 198910. Chapter XIII of the 1989 Act titled ‗Liability of Railway Administration for Death and Injury to Passengers … application. In that case, the question before a Constitution Bench of this Court concerned whether the proviso to Section 113 which was inserted by the Finance Act 2002 applied retrospectively. The scheme for block assessment was introduced in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.K. Gupta and Anr vs Union of India
Delhi
May-20-2026
Land Acquisition
a bonafide passenger in terms of the expression as required under the provision of Section 2(29) of the Railways Act, 1989 xxxI am strengthened in my aforesaid view of the deceased being a bonafide passenger in view of explanation … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 13.05.2026Pronounced on : 20.05.2026Uploaded on : 20.05.2026 + FAO 113/2022 P.K. GUPTA AND ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Sirish Gupta, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPC
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi), South Central Railways Vs. Kurukundu Balakrishna ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-08-2003
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123(1), 123(2) and 124A; Constitution of India - Article 141; Evidence Act, 1872
II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100
was either injured or had died, was entitled to compensation from the Railways under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, (the Act) is the question that in substance arises for consideration in this reference. Incidentally whether wrongful, careless, … XIII deals with accidents which may be either major or minor, and major accidents are dealt with by Section 113, while minor accidents are dealt with by Section 120 of the Act. Elaborate submissions were made relating to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jan-05-2021
Land Acquisition
v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … (South African Constitutional Court) 112 2007 (1) BCLR47(CC) (South African Constitutional Court) 113 2019 (2) BCLR273(CC) (South African Constitutional Court) 114 Civil Appeal No.96 of … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi), Represented Through the General Manager, Central ...
Orissa
Apr-12-2007
Sales Tax
103(2007)CLT710
consumption, use and sale therein and (iii) entry tax being a substitute of octroi, Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 protects the Railway properties from levy of entry tax.4. Since the grounds taken and the question involved in … Supreme Court in case of Collector of Customs and Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Ors. (1999) 113-STC P. 167 (SC). The Hon'ble Court referring to the decision of the Constitution Bench consisting of nine Judges
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »