Advanced Search Results

Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ534

or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … Conditions of Detention Order to which that challenge was confined were Clauses 9 (iii). 10, 12 (ii) and (xi). 15, 19. 20, 21, 23, 24 … then served with a detention order dated the 19th of December. 1974. made by the first respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to

Lakshmi NaraIn Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(2) and 52; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1959All164; 1959CriLJ283

and that hunger-strikers are liable to be punished either departmentally or by prosecution under Section 52 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894) under which they may be sentenced to imprisonment which may extend to one year.A hunger

Devpuri Hirapuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 161; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(2) and 32(A); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1) and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 27, 33, 432, 433, 434 and 462

Reported in : (1999)3GLR880

contained in Bombay Jail Manual have been framed pursuant to the power conferred under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 59 would read as under;'59. Power to make rules.___(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official … this remission for bad conduct or offences against prison discipline'.In Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary, at Page 994, the meaning of the word 'remission' is, inter alia, stated as under;1. a. An act of remitting.b. The

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … not exceeding 15 days at a time (8)Hand cuffing for not exceeding 12 hours at a time (and 9 omitted) 7 & 8 above G.O.Ms.No.2291, Home Dept, dated 12.10.90 I.G's No.7806/GI/90 (b) Major.-- The following punishments shall

Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1 and 2II; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(10), 9 and 18; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 20(2), 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj933

applications for furlough leave by applying Rule 4(10) of the Furlough Rules.12. Referring to Section 48A of the Prisons Act, 1894, it was sought to be contended that the petitioners having been already punished under the said provision of … surrendered themselves and the petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2300 of 2004 came to be arrested after 93 days' of overstay whereas the petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition No. 81 of 2005 came to be arrested

Danial H. Walcott Vs. Superintendent, Nagpur Central Prison

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1972)74BOMLR436

passed in this case has been clearly made in violation of the provisions of Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and that the order is vitiated as having been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.9.

HusseIn Khan Mohamed Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR262

and sentenced to imprisonment shall be deemed to be a convicted criminal prisoner within the meaning of the Prisons Act, 1894, and shall be governed by the provisions of that Act and the rules made thereunder during the term … (2) - Maintenance of Internal Security (Maharashtra Conditions of Detention) Order, 1971, Clause 37--Prisons Act (IX of of 1894), Section 3(2), (3)--When does the custody of a security prisoner gets itself converted into that of a convicted criminal

State of Haryana Vs. Mahender Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 59(5); State Reorganisation Act; West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 54 and 55; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 32, 72 and 161; West Bengal Jail Code; Prisons Rules - Rules 2, 20 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 432, 433 and 433A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 433A

Reported in : 2008CriLJ444; 2007(12)SCALE669; 2007AIRSCW6988

had been dismissed. 3. The State of Punjab in exercise of its power conferred upon it under the Prisons Act, 1894 made rules. They have statutory force. Sub-rules (a), (b), (c), (d) and (f) of Rule 2 read as … the Superintendent shall report accordingly to the Local Government with a view to the passing of orders under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.21. Save as provided by rule 20, when a prisoner has … special orders from the Local Government. The Punjab Rules were amended on 9.03.1962, in terms whereof, 'life convict' has been defined to mean 'prisoner whose

Babupahalwan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 59; Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules, 1968 - Rules 358, 358(1), 359 and 359(12); Madhya Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 3, 3(5) and 9(1); Madhya Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Rules, 1964 - Rules 3, 6, 7, 9 and 10; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 401, 432, 433 and 433A; Uttar Pradesh Prisoners' Release on Probation Act, 1938; Indian Penal Code; Constitution of India - Articles 72, 161, 226 and 227

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2704

under Rule 359 of M.P. Prison Rules 1968 (For brevity 'Prison Rules') framed under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (No. 9 of 1894). Some of the petitioners applied for their release on licence under the provisions of

Rajib Mukhopadhyaya and ors. Vs. Registrar Cooperative Societies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Cooperative Societies Act - Sections 4, 13(8), 13(9), 20(1) and 97; Societies Registration Act; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 29, 30, 30(2) and 56; Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973 - Rules 24(2), 34A, 36A and 41A; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 19(4) and 31A(1)

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT321; 2007(97)DRJ273

of the said judgment reads as follows:34. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobraj impugns the virus of Section 56. But, the Court does not 'rush … 4 and 20(1) of the Act as well as ultra virus the rule making power contained in Section 97 of the Act and the said rule is accordingly quashed. The result of this would be that the