Advanced Search Results

P. Baskaran Vs. Ayyakannu Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 5, Rules 17, 19, 20 and 20(1)

Reported in : AIR2009Mad114

the said judgment goes thus:15. The High Court, in our view, has also misinterpreted Section 27 of the Post Office Act, 1898. The requirement of the section has been complied with in this case. The reasoning of the High Court

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 11(2), 12

writ petition and held that the demand notice dated 10.9.1999 is contrary to Section 11(2) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and remitted the matter with a direction to the Postal Authority to … was committed by them. Till that date, the Postal Authority had not produced the so called notification dated 27.8.1997. Therefore, the appellant was seriously prejudiced by non- production of that document.16. It was further contended that the

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT772(Raj)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … urged that the rules made under the Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945, were not published as required by Section 27 of the Jaipur Act nor they were published after the promulgation of the Rajasthan Ordinance of 1949. Under

Neena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3302

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … Herschell in Henthorri v. Fraser.10. Thereafter the reference was answered in para 27 of the decision as under:27. My answer to the question referred to … and in circumstances of the case the tenant-respondent could not be said to have committed a default under Section 3(1)(a) in respect of payment of Rs. 35 which he sent to the plaintiff-landlords by a money order

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

This Clause 139, in essence, is an extension of what is provided in Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Section 9 of the said Post Office Act, 1898 reads as under:'9. Power to make rules as to registered … base of weight. The special January, 2001 issue was posted from Delhi on three dates (23.12.2000, 26.12.2000 and 27.12.2000). For the said postal dispatches on the said three dates, a bill dated 1.1.2001 was raised by the

Ravi Raghuramayya Vs. Koneru Rama Tulasamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Psot Office Act, 1898 - Sections 14; Postal Rules; Postal Regulations

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD35; 2004(4)ALT526

his evidence was on record.(2) Whether the Court below was justified in declaring Section 14 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 as not mandatory.(3) Whether the landlady had not waived her right in view of the acceptance of amounts.The … lower Appellate Court was justified in drawing presumption under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 27 of the A.P. General Clauses Act with reference to service of quit notice by the Postman when the

Ramachandra Narasimha Kulkarni Vs. State of Mysore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Post Offices Act, 1898 - Sections 52, 53 and 55

Reported in : AIR1964SC1701; 1964CriLJ609; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)51; [1964]7SCR606

determine, in this case, is what the expression 'wilfully detains or delays' in s. 53 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (Act VI of 1898), hereinafter called the Act, means. I do not agree that it means such detention … or delay of a postal article by an officer of the post office in one of the several sections which create offences under this Act. There are 21 such sections, being sections 49 (1)31 Ch. D. 174. … (3)78 Law E. 389. (4) A.I.R. 1929 All. 826. (5)1951 2 S.T.C. 27. (6) I.L.R. 1949 Madras, 121. L/P(D)ISCI-20 to 56 and 58 to 70,

Mohanan and ors. Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulations of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 - Sections 2, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 72; Railways Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966; Railway Protection Officers Act - Sections 8; Orissa (Schedule Area) Money Lenders Regulation, 1967; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 155(2), 173, 173(2), 195(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 211; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 55 and 72

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1709; 2008(1)KLJ445

v. State of Gujarat : 1971CriLJ258 , cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 55 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 was taken on a police report filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Under Section 72 of the said Act … mining of sand during the monsoon period. The accused have thereby committed offences punishable under Sections 20 and 27 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Sand Act.THE COGNIZANCE3. The learned Magistrate took cognizance

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Firm Ram Gopal Hukum Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 141; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 6 and 34; Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1960All672

Both revisions are dismissed with costs. Civil - duty of Post Office - Sections 6 and 34 of Post Office Act, 1898 - V. P. Article not delivered - post office is to bear the value of parcel - no … those of the House of Lords in England even without Article 141. 27. But they were not content with the mere binding force of the … ORDERS.S. Dhavan, J. 1. These are two connected applications under Section 25 of the Small Causes Court Act which raise an important question of law relating, to the scope

The Management Vs. S.Radhakrishnan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981 - Section 3; Tamil Nadu Payment of Subsistence Allowance Rules, 1981 - Rule 5-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114; Tamil Nadu Act, 43 of 1981 - Section 4

has been served on the respondent.15.The High Court, in our view, has also misinterpreted Section 27 of the Post Office Act, 1898. The requirement of the section has been complied with in this case. The reasoning of the High Court