Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: post office act 1898 section 23 · Page 1 of about 709 results (0.132 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 2008

Mohanan and ors. Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-22-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulations of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 - Sections 2, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27 and 72; Railways Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966; Railway Protection Officers Act - Sections 8; Orissa (Schedule Area) Money Lenders Regulation, 1967; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 155(2), 173, 173(2), 195(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 211; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 55 and 72

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1709; 2008(1)KLJ445

v. State of Gujarat : 1971CriLJ258 , cognizance of an offence punishable under Section 55 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 was taken on a police report filed under Section 173 Cr.P.C. Under Section 72 of the said Act … offence under the Orissa (Schedule Area) Money Lenders Regulation, 1967 could not be treated as a complaint under Section 23 of the said Regulation where under no cognizance could be taken of the offence punishable under the Regulation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2003

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

This Clause 139, in essence, is an extension of what is provided in Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Section 9 of the said Post Office Act, 1898 reads as under:'9. Power to make rules as to registered … in respect of the postal dispatches of the Special January, 2001 issue on the said three dates (i.e., 23.12.2000, 26.12.2000 and 27.12.2000). The revised bill was for an amount of Rs. 1,01,900.00 and, after givingcredit for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 11(2), 12

writ petition and held that the demand notice dated 10.9.1999 is contrary to Section 11(2) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and remitted the matter with a direction to the Postal Authority to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 18 1998

M/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 39, 40 42 and 48; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Sections 9, 23, 24 and 53 - Rules 3 & 4; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 6 to 16 and 18 to 37, 41 and 55; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 21, Rules 35, 95 and 96

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339

last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Sections 28 and 29 of the indian Post Office Act, 1898.'9. In first special leave petition No. 12986/97, land situated in Survey No. 40, Village Mandalla, Taluk Choryasi … district whether or not such land is good agricultural land; (ii) determine, having regard to the provisions of Section 23 and 24 of the Act, the approximate amount of compensation likely to be payable in respect of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2009

Punadipadu Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Vs. D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : ServiceTrusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 9A, 9B, 9C, 12A, 13, 15A, 16, 17, 19, 21, 21A, 21AA, 23, 31(1), 32(3), 32(7), 34, 34A, 50, 51, 52, 53, 60, 62, 62(3), 64, 66, 70, 71, 73, 76 and 117; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960; Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Married Women's Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 2; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 53; Nisi Rules

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT228

v. State 1954 All LJ 822 while interpreting the words 'wilfully detains' occurring in Section 53 of the Post Office Act, 1898 observed that the word 'wilful' has been used by the Legislature to mean only such detention which was … Section 12A, Section 13, Section 15A, Section 16, Section 17, Section 19, Section 21, Section 21A, Section 21AA, Section 23, Sub-section (3) of Section 32, Section 34, Section 34A, Section 60, Section 62, Section 64, Section 66, Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2013

Head Post Master Head Post Office, Mitidoongari Alwar, Rajasthan and A ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : May-21-2013

Subject : Education

on 29.12.2010 and returned it to the complainant/ petitioner. The Central Government using the laid down powers in Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898) section “ 21 has made the following amendment in Indian Post Office Rule 1933, rule … whose final date was fixed as 27.12.2010. For this post, the complainant/ respondent properly filled the application on 23.12.2010 and send the same through Speed Post through non-applicant no. 2/ petitioner no. 2 and submitted the application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2013

Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices Nit, Faridabad and Another Vs. Mahabir Pras ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jul-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (short, District Forum) took Preliminary Objections that : Under Section 6 of œThe Indian Post Office Act, 1898?, the post office is exempted from liability for loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal article in … on 22.12.2004 at Sector-16A, PO and was entrusted to postman, Shri Babu Ram for delivery on 22.12.2004 and 23.12.2004. Shri Babu Ram postman had doubts whether Shri Mahabir Prasad lived at the given address as Shri Mahabir

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1964

Debananda Dora Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-16-1964

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 6 and 33; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 30, 31, 65 and 120; Indian Railways Act - Sections 72

Reported in : AIR1965Ori118

of carrying mails, insured articles etc. perform governmental functions subject of course to the provisions of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.8. The English law on the subject has been stated in Halsbury, III Edition, Volume 30, page 148 … has been stated in Halsbury, III Edition, Volume 30, page 148 (paragraph 239) as follows:'The post office is a branch of the public service and … mere department of the State and not a common carrier are all present in the Indian Act also. Section 6 of that Act says that Government shall not incur any liability by reason of loss or delay

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1983

JaIn Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-13-1983

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Reported in : [1983]53STC54(All)

as defined in the Indian Railways Act, 1890, or in a post office as defined in the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.and omitted Sections 28-C and 28-D from the statute book.11. The petitioners then filed the present writ petitions … of the Act as it then stood, by substituting a new Section 28 in place of the existing Section 23 and further introducing Sections 28-A to 28-D in the Sales Tax Act. The provisions contained in the newly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2004

Ravi Raghuramayya Vs. Koneru Rama Tulasamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Psot Office Act, 1898 - Sections 14; Postal Rules; Postal Regulations

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD35; 2004(4)ALT526

his evidence was on record.(2) Whether the Court below was justified in declaring Section 14 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 as not mandatory.(3) Whether the landlady had not waived her right in view of the acceptance of amounts.The … defendant refused to receive the notice and the same was returned to the plaintiff with an endorsement dated 23-12-1996 to the effect 'Refused-Hence returned to sender'. However the defendant for reasons best known to him filed a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial