Advanced Search Results

Mohamed Zafrul Islam Vs. Birendra Lall

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 1(4), 2, 13 and 38; Post Office Act, 1898; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 2(22) and 42(3); Bombay Motor Vehicles Taxation Act - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1965Bom120; (1964)66BOMLR767; 1965MhLJ124

above contention on behalf of the Respondent,. Mr. Sarobji has mainly relied upon the provisions in the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and similar provisions in the English Act and some decisions of the English Courts relating to the functions … is, therefore, untenable.(4) In connection with these rival contentions, It is first necessary to notice the provisions in Sections 1(4),2(e),2(g),2(h), 13 and 38 of the Act, which run as follows :'1. (4) It (the Act) applies to … ORDER(1) In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner, who is an employee working as a

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT772(Raj)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … to pay the tax is founded on Sections (3) and (4), Income-Tax Act, which are the charging Sections. Section 22 etc. are the machinery sections to determine the amount of tax.'Lord Dunedin in Whitney v. Inland Revenue Commissioners,

Cesc Ltd. Vs. Chief Post Master General and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 11(2), 12

writ petition and held that the demand notice dated 10.9.1999 is contrary to Section 11(2) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and remitted the matter with a direction to the Postal Authority to … preferred by the Company.2. The order impugned before the Division Bench was passed in the Writ Petition No. 2282 of 1999 preferred by the Company against a demand notice dated 10.9.1999 issued by Postal Authority asking the

Postmaster General vs Sisy Nishad

Court : Kerala

in accordance with Section 22C of Act 1987. The counsel also relied on Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 in which it is stated that the Government shall not incur any liability by reason of the loss, … proceedings initiated by the Lok Adalat based on a petition filed by the 1 st respondent under Section 22C(1) read with Section 22A(b)(ii) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (for short 'Act 1987'). The case of

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

This Clause 139, in essence, is an extension of what is provided in Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Section 9 of the said Post Office Act, 1898 reads as under:'9. Power to make rules as to registered … Section 9--Post Office Rules, 1933, Rule 30--Post Office Guide, Part I, Clauses 139, 142--Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226.; In the present case the four pages (54A, 548, 106A and 106B) are accounted for in the overall

Hari Pandurang and anr. Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1904)ILR27Bom276

at his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Part III of the Indian Post Office Act, 1866.45. Nothing has been said before us as to the public notice prescribed by the Act: nor has … certain improvements were projected in the City of Bombay, and an Act called the City of Bombay Improvement Act, 1898, was passed giving to a Board thereby constituted certain powers with a view to carry these improvements into … to be acquired.2. You should also produce on the above date, under Section 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a statement in writing signed … Bombay, under Act I of 1894 in accordance with a declaration, dated 22nd September, 1902, published in the Bombay Government Gazette of the 16th September

Head Post Master Head Post Office, Mitidoongari Alwar, Rajasthan and A ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Education

on 29.12.2010 and returned it to the complainant/ petitioner. The Central Government using the laid down powers in Post Office Act, 1898 (6 of 1898) section “ 21 has made the following amendment in Indian Post Office Rule 1933, rule … Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (the State Commission) in appeal no. 451 of 2012 filed against the order dated 22.02.2012 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Alwar, Rajasthan (the District Forum) in Case no. 269 of

Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices Nit, Faridabad and Another Vs. Mahabir Pras ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (short, District Forum) took Preliminary Objections that : Under Section 6 of œThe Indian Post Office Act, 1898?, the post office is exempted from liability for loss, misdelivery, delay or damage to any postal article in … respondent no.2 containing refund of earnest money of Rs.51,030/- was marked to one Shri Babu Ram postman on 22.12.2004 who refused to deliver the same to Shri Manoj Kumar, the authorized representative of respondent no.1 and asked

Neena Chaturvedi Vs. Public Service Commissioner

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3302

on the specious plea that the sender having the very limited right to reclaim the cheque under the Post Office Act, 1898, the Post Office was his agent' when in fact there was no such reclamation. Of course if there … and Supreme Court of India, Full Bench of this Court in paras 22 and 23 has observed as under:22. From an analysis of these decisions … and in circumstances of the case the tenant-respondent could not be said to have committed a default under Section 3(1)(a) in respect of payment of Rs. 35 which he sent to the plaintiff-landlords by a money order

The Post Master Rupnagar and Another Vs. Balbir Singh

Court : Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

order to cause loss to the respondent. The counsel for the appellants relied upon Sectioin-6 of the India Post Office Act, 1898 and argued that the Govt. is not responsible for the reason of any loss, misdelivery or delay or … 2. Facts in brief are that Balbir Singh, respondent/complainant (hereinafter called as “the respondent”) filed a complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, “the Act”), narrating that his wife Smt. Paramjit Kaur … that his wife Smt. Paramjit Kaur is residing in U.K. and on 22.12.2008, said Paramjit Kaur sent a registered parcel from England vide no.3116725 and