Advanced Search Results

Senior Supdt. of Post Office Vs. K.S. Yadav

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed by it which resulted in miscarriage of justice. He further alleged that once the remedy under Indian Post Office Act is specifically barred, the Consumer Forums cannot grant the remedy. Thus, the order of the District Forum-I is … complainant. The learned Counsel for the appellant has relied on the Section 6 of the Indian Post Offices Act, 1898, which reads as under : “The Government shall not incur any liability by reasons of late, misdelivery or … against the order of the District Forum-I, the appellant, Sr. Superintendent of Police has filed this appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short hereinafter to be referred as the C.P. Act,) praying therein

Oriental Insurance Co. Limited and anr. Vs. Madhumita Sarkar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Contract Act - Section 4; ;Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 3; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

of power under Clause 5.11. Mr. Gupta next refers to the provision of Section 3(c) of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 which runs as follows:3. Meanings of 'in course of transmission by post' and 'delivery'. - For the purposes … Manager of the Insurance Company addressed to the Postmaster of Khanjanchak Post Office, Purba Medinipur and submits that 151 sealed envelopes were sent to the concerned Postmaster along with a list showing total number of envelopes for

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

This Clause 139, in essence, is an extension of what is provided in Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898. Section 9 of the said Post Office Act, 1898 reads as under:'9. Power to make rules as to registered … in this writpetition.5. Immediately on receipt of this Bill, the petitioner sent a letter to the respondent on 15.2.2001 requesting the respondent to cancel the revised Bill as it had already fully paid the bill dated 1.1.2001

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3(1), 7(2), 18A and 40(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 19(5), 140, 265, 277, 278 and 295; Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, 1962; Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Act, 1962; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Excise Profits Tax Act - Sections 15; Finance Act , 1950 - Sections 11; Finance Act, 1959 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1939; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(3) and 22(4); Indian Post Office Act, 1898; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Jaipur Excise Duties Act, 1945 - Sections 27; Jaipur Excise Duties Rules, 1945 - Rules 9, 9B, 10, 10A, 13, 25, 27, 47, 52, 101 and 160; Limitation Act - Schedule - Artic

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT772(Raj)

date there is in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir a law corresponding to the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date :Provided that such repeal, shall not effect … district was concerned with effect from November 1, 1956. It was further held that the notice issued under Section 15 of the Excise Profits Tax Act was legally valid. Thus, the result of the applicability of Section 6

Union of India and Another Vs. D. Venkaiah and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

to costs in this appeal. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. Order modified. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 6 - Case Referred: II (1993) CPJ 141 (NC). (Referred) … service on the part of the opposite parties 1 and 2 and that Section 6 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 is a bar to maintainability of the complaint and as per the provisions of Clauses 184 and 172

Bhikha Lal and ors. Vs. Munna Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3(1); Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 44 and 44(1)

Reported in : AIR1974All366

Gupta and A. K. Kirty, JJ. in which the view taken was that Section 44 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as the Post Office Act) 'contains clear statutory recognition of the principle that the post

The Managing Director, Apsrtc Vs. M. Kamalakumari and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6(1), 9(4), 10, 17, 17(3A) and 45(2); Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 28 and 29

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT180

his last-known residence, address or place of business and registered under Section 28 and 29 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898, and service of it may be proved by the production of the addressee's receipt.' 11. At the time … of the order made in W.P. No. 18061 of 1989 whereas Writ Appeal Nos. 622 of 1993 and 1543 of 1995 arise out of the order made in W.P. No. 734 of 1992. Both the writ petitions

All India Reporter Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Sections 2; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 5; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : AIR1983Bom201; 1983LabIC789; (1983)IILLJ387Bom

e. Law Journals published by the petitioner), however, are registered as newspapers under Section 9 of the Indian post Office Act, 1898, and are transmitted by post as 'Registered Post', as contemplated by Rule 30 of the Indian Post Offices … Tribunal nor gave evidence before the Tribunal in respect of the matters referred to the Tribunal. However, on 15-7-1981 and 3-8-1981. respondent No. 3 -- the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Nagpur addressed communication to the petitioner and asked

Post Master, Keshavgiri and Others Vs. Cor. S.P. Illangovan

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

no order as to costs. Appeal allowed. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 15 and 14(1)(d) - Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 6 - Case Referred: II (1993) CPJ 141 (NC). (Relied) [Para 6] Comparative Citations: 1996 (1)

Branch Post Master Vs. C. Manikayam and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

shall be no order as to costs. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 15 and 14(1)(d) - Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Section 6 - Case Referred: RP No. 175/92 by NCDRC. (Referred) [Para 4] Comparative Citations: 1996 (1)