Advanced Search Results

M/S. Sardesai Transhippers Pvt. Ltd., and Etc. Vs. State of Goa and An ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Port Rules, 1983 - Rules 38, 40, 43, 54, 64 and 67; Constitution of India - Article 165; Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1997Bom326

counsel for the petitioners, namely the validity of the imposition of wharfage under the provisions of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 and the Rules made thereunder. Therefore, we venture to examine in this petition the legality or otherwise of … to refer to the relevant provisions of the Indian Ports Act and the Rules and Notification made thereunder. Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, hereinafter called 'the Act' empowers the Government to extend the operation of … also in Chapter IV deals with area for storage of goods. Rule 43 deals with facility that is to be provided by port authorities for

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

• Section 43 - No duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, or fees under the Indian Registration Act, 1908. 51 (2011) 6 SCC71434 be regarded as trade or business. Reliance was placed upon State of Karnataka v. … may by the said name sue and be sued.” 66 Section 20 of the GMB Act 39 minor ports in the State of Gujarat, and for all matters connected therewith. The Board’s powers under the GMB Act

Rameswara Home and Apartments (Pvt.) Limited Vs. Manojlal Seal and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11, 11(6) and 43; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 - Schedule - Article 137; ;Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 12, 20, 33 37, 37(1), 37(2), 37(3), 37(4) and 37(5); ;Indian Limitation Act, 1908; ;Telegraph Act

Reported in : 2008(3)CHN349

37(1) of the 1940 Act in which it was provided that all the provisions of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 shall apply to arbirations as they apply to the proceedings in Court, which is analogous to Section 43 … the scope of Article 137 of the 1963 Limitation Act.12. Panchu Gopal Bose v. Board of Trustees, for Port of Calcutta reported in : [1993]3SCR361 . In this case, the Supreme Court considered the provisions of Section

M/s N.n. Global Mercantile Private Limited Vs. M/s Indo Unique Flame L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

a document, which is compulsorily registerable but which is not registered. Under Section 49 78 of the Registration Act, 1908, an unregistered document may be used for proving a collateral transaction. Even this is impermissible, if the document … Section 11. The Court referred 3 (2005) 8 SCC6187 to the Judgment in Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Limited4, to conclude that what was to be gone into was only whether an Arbitration Agreement existed or

Container Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Inco ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act. However, a “port”, which also qualifies for the deduction is defined in Section 3(4) of the Indian Ports Act, 1908(Act 15 of 1908) to include “also any part of a river or channel” in which the said … similar nature as may be notified by the board in this behalf in the official gazette.” In paragraph 43 of circular No.772 dated 23rd December, 1995 reported in (1999) 235 ITR St. 35, the Board explained the

New Era Shipping Ltd. and Hatimi Steels Vs. M.V.P. Express and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1840; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 25, 33 and 35; Brussels Arrest Convention Act, 1852; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(55); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 3(7); Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981; Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act, 1982; Customs Act; General Clauses Act; Bombay High Court (Original Sides) Rules - Rules 941 and 949; Supreme Court Rules, 1965 - Rules 4(3) and 11 - Orders 7 and 75

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR556; 2007(6)BomCR138; (2007)109BOMLR1875

in several statutes including Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, Indian Ports Act, 1908, as also the Dictionary meaning cited in the judgment of this Court pronounced in the case of m.v.SAABA … its Admiralty & Vice Admiralty Jurisdiction proceed to arrest first defendant vessel? 43. Reliance is placed upon several definitions. Ms.Sethna urges that the definition of … to hold/arrest any property. He has invited my attention to the Admiralty Courts Act 1861 and more particularly Section 25, 33 and 35 thereof. He has also invited my attention to the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act

B.H.E.L. and anr. Vs. B.K. Vijay and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 40B and 92; ;Uttar Pradesh Factories (Safety Officers) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4 and 5; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; ;Service Law

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1355(SC); [2006(108)FLR1113]; (2006)ILLJ1102SC; 2006(2)SCALE195; (2006)2SCC654; 2006(3)SLJ407(SC)

be undertaken while developing a port cannot be stopped by merely naming them as real estate business. INDIAN PORTS ACT, 1908 Sections 4(1), 6(1) & 3(9) & (8): Minor ports - Jurisdiction to undertake development and privatization of Pondicherry … factory within the meaning of the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Section 40B of the Act provides for employment of such number of Safety Officers as may be specified in … 2500- Rs. 3700 +120-4300 allow. Rev. Rs. Rs. 5400 + 4000-175- allow. 4300 3. Safety Officer (E-1) 15.6.95 Rs. 2500- Rs. 3820 + (Executive Cadre)

Superintending Engineer, Irrigation and Power Department, Srisailam Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 42(2) and 42(7); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16 to 18, 19 and 20 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT516

miscellaneous appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(a) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is by plaintiffs, namely, Superintending Engineer and Executive Engineer of Irrigation … about Rs. 8,64,000/-for Srisailam Project. First defendant accepted offer and agreed to supply material and deliver at Madras Port. Second defendant was instructed to give necessary assistance to plaintiffs. Second plaintiff paid an amount of Rs. 9,00,000/- … as reflected in tally sheet (receipt), which is statutory under Section 42(2) and 42(7) of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. In spite of the same, goods were not delivered. The goods ordered are duly insured with defendants … M.V. Elisabeth v. Harwan Investment and Trading : 1993 Supp (2) SCC 433 and M.V.AI Qumar v. Tsavliris Salvage (International) Limited : (2000) 8 SCC

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Calcutta Vs. the Lowland Tanker C ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Major Port Trust Act;; Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 31 and 31(2);; Calcutta Port Rules - Rules 5 and 45;; The Marchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 352 and 352B;; The Marchant Shipping (Amendment) Act, 1970;; International Collision Rules - Rules 22, 23, 24, 25 and 28

Reported in : (1999)2CALLT364(HC)

however, been contended on behalf of the appellant that under sub-section (2) of section 31 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, the negligence of a pilot or Harbour Master or Assistant Harbour Master placed on board a vessel under

Ayisha K. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Act read with Rule 287 (6) of the Kerala Port Manual Rules, 1960. Section 54 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, fastens criminal liability upon the offenders and Section 55 of the said Act provides that all the offences … K., AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL RAHMAN K., KUNNARA HOUSE, CHATTANCHAL, THEKKIL, KASARAGOD, KERALA-671 541. 3 SHAFI K., AGED 43 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL RAHMAN, NETTANIGE GRAMAM, KASARAGOD-671 543. BY ADVS. SRI.C.IJLAL SMT.UMMUL FIDA RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REP