Advanced Search Results

Ajanta Pharma Limited Vs. Allergan Inc. and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Education

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Mrs. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; the Honourable Mr. D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)

Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the fact that the term "importing" was specifically included in Section 107A of the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, without any mention of the word export" or "offering for sale". This clearly indicates that the legislature did … province or a country other than Canada that regulates the manufacture, construction, use or sale of any product.‖ 65. This provision concerns activities relating to the development and submission of information required by a regulatory body. The

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

claims granted thereby run foul of the provisions of Plant Varieties Act do not impress. Noticeably, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, the then existing Section 5 of the Patents Act, 1970 concerning "inventions where only methods or processes of … II BG I BG II BG I BG II BG I BG II Year 2010 MRP TRAIT VALUE650750 650 750 650 750 Part of AP5090 50 90 NA NA MRP830930 830 930 830 930 Part of AP

The Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M/s. Strategi ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Service Tax

from plant, machinery or equipment. 14. It could be seen from the amendment to Section 65(39a), introduced under Finance Act, 2005, that the definition of … relation to erection, commissioning or installation fo plant, machinery or equipment." 12. By Section 88 of the Finance Act, 2005, Section 65(39a) was amended. The amended Section 65(39a) reads as follows: "(39a) 'erection, commissioning or installation' means any service … (Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order, dated 08.08.2011, made in W.P.(MD)No.11427 of 2006.) V. Ramasubramanian, J. 1. This appeal by the

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

agreement, the Patents Act, 1970, was subjected to large scale changes in three stages; and finally, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, section 5 was altogether deleted from the Parent Act (Patents Act, 1970). Between January 1, 1995 and January 1, … is added to it.Step 9 - Substance is cooled overnight to 25 degrees Celsius, filtered and dried at 65 degrees Celsius, until weight is constant. This results in alpha crystalline form.Step 10 - Alpha form is stirred

Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation and Anr. Vs. Glenmark Pharmaceutical ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

treat T2DM.3. MSD alleges that Glenmark‟s products infringe its patent. MSD also claims that it has been granted patents in 102 countries for the suit patent formulation i.e. the Sitagliptin molecule. The Indian Patent application was filed … Ropes Ltd. v. Mr. Anant Kanoi and Ors., Civil Application No.232 of 2005, in Civil Suit No.4 of 2005, decision dated 13.7.2006, the Madras High … the process or condition of diseases.” (emphasis supplied) 65. The description of industrial applicability is of the … and risk allowing competitors pick the closest imitation and frustrate the monopoly. Such broad claims - or even amendments limiting them later - have not been permitted as being “covetous” (John William Howlett); wide and indeterminate or … MSD and Instamet, by its licensee.4. According to MSD, Sitagliptin is the active pharmaceutical ingredient in the said drugs, which was approved for sale in … suit patent. The learned counsel also explains that Section 48 of the Indian Patent Act, 1970 extends

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Commr. of Central Excise, Thiruvana ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(31), 65(41), 66, 68, 68(1A), 68(2), 69, 69(1), 70, 71, 73, 75 and 105; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1), 6 and 6(1); Constitution of India - Article 246(1); Income Tax Act

Reported in : AIR2008SC798; (2008)214CTR(SC)87; 2007(14)SCALE311; 2008[9]STR3; (2008)12VST1(SC); 2008AIRSCW25; 2008(1)SCC780.

the service tax liability was on the service recipient and despite the amendment of Rule 6 (1) w.e.f. 16.8.2002 agreement still held good as the … Appellate Tribunal, Circuit Bench at Cochin in Final Order No. 477 of 2005, Appeal No. ST/36/2004 was allowed. 3. The basic fact of the matter … indisputably, the appellant was responsible to make payment of the service tax on behalf of the foreign company.8. Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994 provides for levy of service tax on the services specified therein. Section 66 … the center under Entry 23 read with Entry 97 of List I. The submission was held to be patently fallacious by this Court. It was held that Entry 56 of List II did not exclude national highways

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property

agreement, the Patents Act, 1970, was subjected to large scale changes in three stages; and finally, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, section 5 was altogether deleted from the Parent Act (Patents Act, 1970). Between January 1, 1995 and January 1, … added to it. Step 9 - Substance is cooled overnight to 25 degrees Celsius, filtered and dried at 65 degrees Celsius, until weight is constant. This results in alpha crystalline form. Step 10 - Alpha form is

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

filed representations by way of oppositions under section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with request for hearing under rule 55 of the Patents Rules, 2003 … a peak at an angle of refraction 2theta of 20o, said peak having a relative line intensity of 65, i.e. the peak marked (5) in Fig. 2/3. 7. The β-crystal form of the methanesulfonic acid addition salt

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

utilities, industry application programs and other general purpose application programs. IMB Programs shall mean programs protected by IBM's Patents or IMB's Copyrights, other than or in addition to Remarketer's Patents and Remarkets, which are marketed by IMB … by the Indian importer under section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act. Equally, he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation … by this Court’s judgment in Tata Consultancy Services v. State of A.P., 2005 (1) SCC308 He assailed the impugned judgment of the High Court of … Additional Solicitor General relied upon sections 2(a)(v), 19(3), 30A, 52(1)(ad), 58 and 65A of the Copyright Act to buttress the submission that in some of