Advanced Search Results

L. Shiv Dayal L. Mela Mal and ors. Vs. Firm Bishan Dass Shankar Dass

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 5; Punjab Opium Orders, 1956 - Order 59(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1961P& H405

contravened the provisions of Section 23 of the Indian. Contract Act and the various Rules framed under the Opium Act, No, 1 of 1878. In the second place, he contended that there could not be a valid partnership

Raj Kumar Karwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 21(2); Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 154, 162, 173, 176, 190(1) and 439; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 21, 23, 29, 30, 35, 36-A, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52-A, 53, 54, 55, 57 and 67; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135A; Opium Act, 1856; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 - Article 25; International Covenant on Economical, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966 - Article 12; Police Act, 1861; Sea Customs Act - Sections 167(81); Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Sections 8(1)

Reported in : AIR1991SC45; 1991CriLJ97; 1990(2)Crimes435(SC); 1990(48)ELT496(SC); JT1990(1)SC503; 1990(1)SCALE509; (1990)2SCC409; [1990]2SCR63; 1990(2)LC373(SC); 1991 Cri LJ 197

over narcotic drugs was exercised through certain State and Central enactments, principally through the Opium Act, 1856, the Opium Act. 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, etc. However, with the increase in drug abuse and illicit drug traffic certain … a complaint was lodged against the said two persons under Sections 21, 23, 29 and 30 of the Act and Section 135A of the Customs … Revenue Intelligence (DRI) who have been invested with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station under Section 53 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), 'police officers' within the meaning

V.P. Thimmaiah Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 31, 63 and 64; Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995 - Sections 7(1) and 8; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1961 - Sections 31(1); Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Rules, 1970 - Rules 23 and 66; The Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486, 487, 488 and 489; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 112 and 114; Opium Act, 1878

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD201

may cancel any other licence granted or permit issued to such persons under this Act, or under the Opium Act, 1878.(3) The holder of licence or permit shall not be entitled to any compensation for its cancellation or … limini.11. The licence that was granted to the petitioner was under Rule 23 of the A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 in Form … the said Mangala Maruthi Prasad, sezied the property and registered a case in Crime No.47 of 1998-99 under Section 7(1) read with Section 8(e) of the A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995.3. Thereafter, on the basis of the confessional

Bhagwan Dass Kaka Ram Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9, 233, 234, 235, 236 and 239; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 23; Evidence Act - Sections 27; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5 and 8

Reported in : AIR1960P& H643; 1960CriLJ1657

for determination in this revision is whether Bhagwan Dass can be separately tried under Section 9 of the Opium Act (Act I of 1878) for two recoveries of illicit opium from his possession on the same day in … constitute different offences as alleged by the prosecution, there have to be separate trials as envisaged by Section 233 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This would of course be subject to be exceptions set out in

U.O.i. and anr. Vs. Sajeev V. Deshphande

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to some extent dealt with the legislative subject matter of the Act. They are Opium Act, 1857, The Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Subsequently, various international treaties and protocols etc. dealing with the menace of … punishment extends upto 20 years and carries a fine upto 2 lakhs and for special reasons even more. Section 23[6]. prescribes the punishment for illegal import to India or export out of India of narcotic drugs and psychotropic

Raghunandhan Reddy Vs. State of Hyderabad Through Secy. of Government, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Hyderabad Abkari Act, 1316F - Sections 2, 3(1), 41 and 41(2)

Reported in : AIR1963AP110

F., and Section 5 of the Hyderabad intoxicating Drugs Act, 1333 F. and Section 5 of the Indian Opium Act, 1878. Clause (1) prescribes the conditions to be satisfied before a person is permitted to bid at the auction … City to be held on 18-8-1954. The toddy or sendhi auctions for the same year were fixed for 23-8-1954. On the date fixed for the auction of country liquor, objections were raised by the intending bidders before

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the passage of time and … appellant when his statement(s) in question were recorded by the RPF officer.” 23 20.We now come to the judgment of this Court in Nandini Satpathy … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, it was noted that … Ruma Pal, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is under trial for offences alleged to have bene committed under Sections 21 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (referred to hereafter as the

Ravinder Kumar Vs. Nct of Delhi (State)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Times 1 where the Supreme Court was concerned with the definition of ‘opium’ under Section 3 of the Opium Act, 1878, the Division Bench concluded that “for determining whether the opium recovered is of a small quantity or a … custody since the date of his arrest i.e. 25th February 2004. He continued to remain in custody till 23rd July 2010 when he was granted bail by the Supreme Court of India by an order of that

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, 2022. List of … highly erroneous and deserves to be quashed and set aside. [Paras 11, 23, 25, 40] Case Law Cited Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985