Advanced Search Results

Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

executed whereas, no such modification was carried out, thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(a) of the Navy Act 1957. There is no dispute in regard to the fact that the appellant had signed the Work Completion Report … far as Charge No. 25 is concerned. 17. The next charge to be dealt with is Charge No. 26, which reads as under: (26) Did at about 1340 hours on 02nd May 1989 strike then Sub-Lieutenant (now

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

the provisions of this Act would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, … jurisdiction, as evidenced by Section 256 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, Section 27 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 26 of Gift Tax Act, 1958, and Section 18 of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. Similarly, there are parallel

Union of India and Others Vs. R.P. Yadav

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceContract

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(20), 11, 14(1), 15, 16, 17, 18, 41 and 184(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Contract Act - Sections 18, 19; Indian Contract Act, 1982 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : AIR2000SC2252; JT2000(6)SC371; 2000(4)SCALE600; (2000)5SCC325; [2000]Supp1SCR196; (2000)3UPLBEC2174

In our view the answer to the first question rests on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the, Navy Act, 1957, the Navy (Discipline and Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement … Misc. Provision) Regulation 1965 and Navy Order No. Str. 17 of 1994 regarding re-engagement of 'Sailors' (RP/0805/93). In Section 3(20) 'sailor' is defined as a person in the naval service other than an officer. In Section 11, … a further period of four years and signed the requisite papers on 26-4-1996. The option was accepted and re-engagement till 31-1-2002 was approved by the

K.C. Shibu Vs. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Governm ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

08° 19.62'N 73° 03.4'E off Minicoy island and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 55(2) of the Navy Act 1957. ii. Charge 2. Between 25th day of November 2003 and 29th day of November 2003 contravene Regulation 1331 … out patrol in areas South East of Minicoy on 25.11.2003. After disembarking stores at Minicoy and Kavarathy on 26.11.2003, the ship was to carry out surface shoots and deck landing practise and enter Kochi harbour on 27.11.2003

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

seeking transfer of the case of the detenu to the Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and … Command, who is the convening authority, took a decision to bring the accused to trial-by Court Martial on 26-6-1992 giving six clear days for preparation. The notice was served upon the accused by Trial Judge Advocate.4. At

M/S. Bombay Intelligence Security (i) Ltd. Vs. Harinarayan Jeet Bahadu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

subject to the Air Force Act,1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act,1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act,1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or … 3. On the aforesaid facts, Respondent no.1 approached the Labour Court at Mumbai by filing the complaint under Section 28 read with Items 1(a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of … a managerial nature.?(emphasis supplied) (NOTE: By Maharashtra Act No.XXIII of 2006 dated 26.2.2006, by amendment in sub-clause (iv) words œone thousand six hundred rupees? are

Union of India Rep. by Chief Engineer, Naval Works, Kochi Vs. M/S. Bha ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Arbitration

as in the Army Act, with slight modifications, and captioned as 'Regulations' appear in Chapter X of the Navy Act, 1957. We mention it only because the contract work was executed in a naval base). In the above backdrop, … too was applied for, and, thus, there was flagrant violation of the provisions of sub section (2) of Section 26 of the Act by the arbitrator. Disallowing of the request to examine the expert, and, the arbitration proceeding

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs. the Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Eastern Na ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : MRTP

thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957.2) Did at about 19.20 hours on the 4th day of June, 1998 wrongfully confine Shri N.K.Marwaha, Branch Manager … applicant and other two accused by Court Martial. A preliminary charge sheet in the case was filed on 26.09.1998 before the VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. No part of the amount of Rs.2,54,371/- was recovered from the applicant

Ex Cdre. Narinder Pandit Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

and messing was provided at the outstation, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 60(d) of the Navy Act, 1957. (2) Did on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim … on 19th Aug 2002 knowingly make a fraudulent statement in a document, namely Temporary Duty Claim CG/3224/NM dated 26th Aug 02 for visit from Delhi to Halol and Vapi/Mumbai and back to Delhi from AM 08 Aug

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 … 1980. He was charge-sheeted in January 1990 and tried by a General Court Martial on 5 charges under Sections 43, 47 and 48 of the Navy Act, found guilty of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th charges … 3rd, 4th and 5th charges and given a sentence of dismissal on 26.2.90. One year and 4 months later, he was given a show cause