Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: national sectionrity act · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.010 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 23 2000

Gaurav Kaushik (In Jail) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jun-23-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Sectionrity Act, 1980 - Sections 3 and 3(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 3, 20, 20(1), 20(2) and 20(3); General Clauses Act

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2870

order was likely to expire on 28-6-2000. In both the matters the detention orders have been passed under National Sectionrity Act [hereinafter referred to as the Act] on 29-6-1999 by the Chief development officer, Meerut, purporting to act as … Development Officer in Meerut and had been authorized to pass an order on 29-6-1999 under Section 3[3] of National Sectionrity Act, 1980 in this case. The deponent is well conversant with facts and circumstances of the case and is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2001

Rahmat Ali Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-13-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Sectionrity Act

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2873

is challenging the impugned detention order dated 16-8-2000. Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition passed under The National Sectionrity Act.3. We have carefully perused the impugned detention order as well as the grounds of detention of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1993

Veb Deautfracht Seereederei Rostock (D.S.P. Lines) a Department of the ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 86(2); Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : AIR1994SC516; I(1994)BC549(SC); (1994)2CALLT12(SC); JT1993(6)SC479; (1994)1MLJ66(SC); 1993(4)SCALE390; (1994)1SCC282; [1993]Supp3SCR659; 1994(1)LC149(SC)

this aspect was re-examined by the English Court as well as this Court. In the case of Baccus SECTIONR.L. v. Servicio National Del Trigo, [1957] 1 Q.B. 438 it was said :Are we then to hold that … bodies of water, the natural resources of the continental shelf, the larger industrial enterprises, banks and insurance companies nationally-owned farms, traffic routes, the means of transport of the railways, ocean shipping and civil aviation, post and telecommunication … Secretary to that Government. In view of the provisions aforesaid, before any action is launched or a suit is filed against a foreign State, person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial