Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: mines act 1952 section 71 · Page 1 of about 273 results (0.071 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 09 2006

The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu Vs. A. P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 19 and 28; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 212(2), 219(1), 220 and 360; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 8; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 1(3), 18 and 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71 and 161; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 562; Customs Act, 1962; Sea Customs Act, 1878; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12; Indian Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 2; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2; Defence of India Rules - Rule 126P(2); Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 43

Reported in : AIR2007SC51; 2006CriLJ4772; [2007(2)JCR54(SC)]; JT2006(12)SC590; 2007(1)MPHT1; 2007(1)OLR(SC)143; 2006(10)SCALE62; (2006)11SCC473

should be construed as references to the definition of 'owner' in Clause (1) of Section 2 of the Mines Act, 1952, which repealed and re-enacted 1923 Act. Consequently, the references to Section 562 of Old Code in Section 19 … Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, as held by the High Court is clearly unacceptable. Section 71 IPC provides the complete answer. The same reads as follows:71. Limit of punishment of offence made up of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1961

Mohan Lal Goenka and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2), 46, 57, 58, 73 and 88; Mines Act, 1923 - Sections 24, 29 and 30; Creche Rules, 1946 - Rules 3, 3(1), 7 and 7(1); Constitution of India - Article 134(1)

Reported in : AIR1961SC1543; 1961CriLJ713; [1961(3)FLR326]; (1961)IILLJ404SC; [1962]2SCR36

standards of such rooms, and the nature and extent of the supervision to be provided therein." In the Mines Act, 1952, section 58 contains the provision empowering the Central Government to make rules for all or any of the purposes … the rules and approved by the competent authority. It was held by the High (1) A.I..R. (1956) Nag. 71. Court that it was the owner alone who could be deemed to have contravened the rule and that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1992

Jaswant Worah and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 26

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT1; 1992(22)DRJ476

part thereof. Parliament, with due deliberation, in S.3(n) adopted by incorporation the enlarged definition of owner in S.2(l), Mines Act, 1952 to make the Nationalisation Act all embracing and fully effective. The definition is wide enough to include three … have been nationalised and compensation was payable, the Commissioner would refer the matter to the Competent Court under Section 26 of the Act to that extent only. The compensation would be paid in accordance with the decision

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 30 2015

The Paristhithy Samrakshana Janakeeya Samithy, rep. by its Patron P.P. ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-30-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

securing environmental clearance and without there being any approved mining plan. It is submitted that provisions of the Mines Act, 1952 and Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1961 Regulations") are also required to be followed … which causes perpetual threat to human life. The private respondents have not secured permission to use machinery under Section 233 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. Blasting and firing are done within the dangerous zone of 300

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1995

Housing Board of Haryana Vs. Haryana Housing Board Employees Union and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 24, 32, 40 and 43; Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971 - Sections 2(J), 5, 7, 14, 20, 56, 71 and 72; Constitution of India - Article 12; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952; Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12(2); Bihar and Orissa Mining Settlement Act, 1920; U.P. General Clauses Act - Sections 4(25); Markets Act, 1966;U.P. Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections2(9) and 18

Reported in : AIR1996SC434; JT1995(8)SC37; (1996)ILLJ833SC; 1995(6)SCALE139; (1996)1SCC95; [1995]Supp4SCR533

eleven members of whom not less than two and not more than four are elected by owners of mines within the Mining Settlement, three non-officials selected by the State Government and two or more members but not … Municipal Act, 1911 (Punjab Act 3 of 1911), or a Gram Panchayat constituted under the Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952 (Punjab Act 4 of 1953), or a Panchayat Samiti or a Zilla Parishad constituted under the Punjab Panehayal … control of the State Government over the Board are contained in Sections 71 and 72 of the Act relevant portions of which are re-produced below … the Haryana Housing Board is a 'Local Authority' within the meaning of Section 32(iv) of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 is the question to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2026

M/S Universal Promoters & Developers & Ors vs Government of Nc ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-2026

Subject : Education

of 56d) On the judgment of Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in Rakesh Dhariwal and Ors. v. Balaji Marble Mines and Ors.6, to contend that under IPA, the Registrar of Firms is having limited powers for rectification of … to constitute the commission in a manner other than that provided in the statute itself (Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952). It is submitted that the rule of construction embedded in Section 21 of GCA cannot apply to the … Firm Rules, 1972, framed under the exercise of powers conferred under Section 71(2) of the IPA. It was contended that as per Rule 3, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2024

Mineral Area Development Authority Etc. Vs. M/s Steel Authority Of Ind ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-25-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

as an excavation in the earth for the purpose of obtaining minerals.188 The expression was defined under the Mines Act 1952 to primarily mean any excavation for the purposes of searching for or obtaining minerals189 and to include the … (1970) Michigan Law Review 471, 484. 69 (1997) 1 SCC388[34]. 70 ibid 71 M C Mehta v. Union of India, (2009) 6 SCC142[45]. 72 T … F. Whether royalty is tax ............................................................................................ 48 i. Royalty under the MMDR Act ............................................................................. 48 ii. Purpose of Section 9 of the MMDR Act ............................................................. 54 iii. Contours of a mining lease ................................................................................ 56 a. Lease and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1957

State of Rajasthan Vs. Pannalal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-19-1957

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1926; Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 88; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Part B States (Laws) Act, 1951 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1958Raj59; 1958CriLJ226

State against the acquittal of Pannalal and eight others of an offence under Section 73 of the Indian Mines Act, 1952 (No. XXXV of 1952) thereinafter called the Act) read with Rules 23 and 71 of the Indian Metalliferous

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1996

Union of India Vs. A.B. Shah and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-09-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 22, 72, 73 and 79; Coal Mines Regulations, 1957 - Regulation 100(1); Consumers Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1996SC3281; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)15; 1996(2)Crimes181(SC); JT1996(5)SC128; 1996(4)SCALE307; (1996)8SCC540; [1996]Supp2SCR620

Bench), this appeal is filed by special leave.2. The appellant preferred a complaint under Section 73 of the Mines Act 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Regulation No. 100(1) of the Coal Mines Regulations 1957 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1960

The State of Orissa Vs. Iswar Das and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-11-1960

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 20; General Caluses Act - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1960Ori180; 1960CriLJ1355

73 of the Mines Act, 1952, read with the Rules 23 and 71 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926. The same contentions were raised … by limitation; and (2) the Indian Minos Act, 1923, (Act IV of 1923), having been repealed by the Mines Act, 1952, (Act 35 of 1932), the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation which was framed under the 1923 Act was no … and A. C. Adhikari were the agent and manager respectively of the said Company, Under Clause (i) of Section 3 of the Indian Metalliferous Mines Regulation, 1926, the owner, agent, or manager of a mine is to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial