Advanced Search Results

M/S Mobisy Technologies Pvt Ltd., vs M/S J G Hosiery Pvt Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

counsel forthe Respondent, is that, 6.1. The Petitioner being a medium enterprise, it would be governed by the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 [‘MSMED Act’, for short] and in terms of Section 18 thereof, any proceedings for recovery or otherwise would … Accordingly, I have no hesitation in holding thatmedium enterprises are not covered under Section 18 of the MSMED Act, 2006. Chapter V, including the special mechanism of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, applies only to micro and small

M/S.Avl India Pvt Ltd vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Coun ...

Court : Chennai

6 supply of services or goods and hence does not attract the provisions of Chapter V of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act,2006 (in short ‘MSME Act’). Mr. N. Naveen Kumar points out that the stage at which the proceedings

Spices Board vs Pilotsmith (India) Pvt.Ltd.

Court : Kerala

take appropriate steps to recover the amount with interest at the rate provided in Chapter 5 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, from the date of the Award till the date of recovery. Aggrieved, the Board moved the District Court … for a dismissal of the same.3. The Council referred the matter for arbitration and appointed Justice (Retd.) T. V. Ramakrishnan as the sole Arbitrator. The pleadings filed before the Council were adopted before the Arbitrator as well.4.

K.Baby vs Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Kerala

interest on Exhibit P3 security deposit from the date of Exhibit P5 as per Chapter V of the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprise Development Act 2006.”2. I heard Adv. Rajesh R, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the … security deposit from the date of Exhibit P5 as per Chapter V of the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprise Development Act 2006.”2. I heard Adv. Rajesh R, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Adv. T. V.

Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mahakali Foods Pvt. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Civil Misc. Application No.54/2016 filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act read with Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the MSMED Act, 2006”), whereby the commercial 3 court had confirmed the award made … of afore-stated spectrum of cases, following common questions of law arise for consideration: (i) Whether the provisions of Chapter-V of the MSMED Act, 2006 would have an effect overriding the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996?. (ii)

The Indur District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. M/s. Microp ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Nos.13/EFC/2011/120 and 13/EFC/2011/119 respectively by declaring that the claims therein did not fall within the ambit of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for brevity, the Act of 2006'). By individual interim orders dated 21.11.2012 passed in W.P.Nos.35872 and 35879 of … of such memorandum and it is not mandatory. Delayed payments to micro and small enterprisesis dealt with in Chapter V of the Act of 2006. Section 15 in this Chapter states that where a supplier supplies goods or

The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited and Another Vs. U ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

to be noticed that the proceedings were initiated by the applicants under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Act, 2006. Chapter V of the said enactment is referable to delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises. Section 16 of the … reference to their ranking before the Facilitation Council. 3. Three applications were filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for short ‘Micro Act’). Respondent No.2 therein i.e., the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (for short hereinafter referred

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Adarsh Nobel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Orissa at Cuttack, by way of the petition bearing MSEFC Case No. 56/2022, under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”). VI. The MSEF Council passed an arbitral award dated 10th July, 2023, thereby, directing the petitioner … enacting the MSMED Act, 2006 would get frustrated. xxx 52. The upshot of the above is that: 52.1. Chapter V of the MSMED Act, 2006 would override the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996. 52.2. No party to

Shreyas Marketing vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

Court : Kerala

the 1st respondent, the Facilitation Council established by the Karnataka State Government as per Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (in short, “Act 2006”). The allegation in Ext.P1 is that the petitioner has failed to make payment of … the writ petition.6. To consider the issue involved, it is profitable to scan throughthe relevant provisions of the Act, 2006. Chapter V deals with delayed payments to micro and small enterprises. Section 15 mandates that when a supplier, supplies any

M/s. Silpi Industries Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Undertakings Act, 1993 (for short, ‗IDPASC Act‘)]. presently under the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council constituted under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‗the MSMED Act‘). The earlier IDPASC Act was replaced by MSMED Act and earlier … medium enterprises. Liability of buyer and the mechanism in the event of default is by various provisions under Chapter V of the Act. Sections 5 to 19 which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of these cases