Advanced Search Results

Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Vs. Mahakali Foods Pvt. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Civil Misc. Application No.54/2016 filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act read with Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the MSMED Act, 2006”), whereby the commercial 3 court had confirmed the award made … of afore-stated spectrum of cases, following common questions of law arise for consideration: (i) Whether the provisions of Chapter-V of the MSMED Act, 2006 would have an effect overriding the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996?. (ii)

The Indur District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. Vs. M/s. Microp ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Nos.13/EFC/2011/120 and 13/EFC/2011/119 respectively by declaring that the claims therein did not fall within the ambit of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for brevity, the Act of 2006'). By individual interim orders dated 21.11.2012 passed in W.P.Nos.35872 and 35879 of … of such memorandum and it is not mandatory. Delayed payments to micro and small enterprisesis dealt with in Chapter V of the Act of 2006. Section 15 in this Chapter states that where a supplier supplies goods or

The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited and Another Vs. U ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

to be noticed that the proceedings were initiated by the applicants under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Act, 2006. Chapter V of the said enactment is referable to delayed payments to Micro and Small Enterprises. Section 16 of the … reference to their ranking before the Facilitation Council. 3. Three applications were filed under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (for short ‘Micro Act’). Respondent No.2 therein i.e., the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (for short hereinafter referred

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd vs Adarsh Nobel Corporation Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Orissa at Cuttack, by way of the petition bearing MSEFC Case No. 56/2022, under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”). VI. The MSEF Council passed an arbitral award dated 10th July, 2023, thereby, directing the petitioner … enacting the MSMED Act, 2006 would get frustrated. xxx 52. The upshot of the above is that: 52.1. Chapter V of the MSMED Act, 2006 would override the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996. 52.2. No party to

Shreyas Marketing vs Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council

Court : Kerala

the 1st respondent, the Facilitation Council established by the Karnataka State Government as per Section 21 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (in short, “Act 2006”). The allegation in Ext.P1 is that the petitioner has failed to make payment of … the writ petition.6. To consider the issue involved, it is profitable to scan throughthe relevant provisions of the Act, 2006. Chapter V deals with delayed payments to micro and small enterprises. Section 15 mandates that when a supplier, supplies any

M/s. Silpi Industries Vs. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Undertakings Act, 1993 (for short, ‗IDPASC Act‘)]. presently under the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council constituted under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‗the MSMED Act‘). The earlier IDPASC Act was replaced by MSMED Act and earlier … medium enterprises. Liability of buyer and the mechanism in the event of default is by various provisions under Chapter V of the Act. Sections 5 to 19 which are relevant for the purpose of disposal of these cases

Lifecare Innovations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. versus Union of India & ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.727

2021) 25 February 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Sandeep Mehta, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Issue arose whether the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, coupled with the Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises Order 2012 mandate procurement of 25 percent … [2025] 2 S.C.R. 727 : 2025 INSC 269 Lifecare Innovations Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (Writ Petition(C) No. 1301 of 2021) 25 February 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and

M/S Jubilant Marketing Pvt Ltd vs M/S Robbins Tunneling and Trenchless ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

filed under Section 11(6)(c) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”), read with Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”), seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator for the adjudication of the disputes between the parties, with … incidentalDigitally Signed ARB.P. 2129/2025 Page 9 of 29 thereto. The Act has been divided into six Chapters, and Chapter V pertains to the “Delayed payments to micro and small enterprises‖. xxx xxx xxx34. One of principles of statutory

M/S. Eden Exports Company Rep by Its Partner Vs. Union of India, Rep b ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2013WLR1; 2013(1)CWC378

2009 & etc. batch, dated 20.08.2010. Most of the writ petitions were filed challenging various provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (Central Act 27 of 2006) as unconstitutional. Some writ petitions were filed challenging the orders passed by the … writ petitions have more or less reiterated the contentions raised before the learned single Judge. Their challenge encircles Chapter V of the MSMED Act. 4. In order to appreciate their contentions, it would be profitable to note down,

M/S Harcharan Dass Gupta versus Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]6S.C.R.422

May 2025 [Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha* and Joymalya Bagchi, JJ.] Issue for Consideration In a case covered under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Development) Act, 2006, whether the High Court erred in holding that the Delhi Arbitration Centre lacked jurisdiction to conduct arbitral proceedings … 2006 and the unambiguous expressions used therein, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the provisions of Chapter V of the MsMed Act, 2006 have an effect overriding the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996 .” [2025]