Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Meera Nireshwalia Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2395

fifth respondent, enough to attract the powers and duties of a police officer under section 13 of the Lunacy Act, 1912. 22. Section 13 of the Lunacy Act states, '(1) Every Officer-in-charge of a police station may arrest or … her and that the seventh respondent had, in the meantime, already sold the house to respondents 8 and 9 under a sale deed dated 30-9-1988 followed by an agreement between the seventh respondent on the one hand

Miss. Ezlinda Fernandes Vs. Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-divisional Magistra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3, 3(5) and 13; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR641

not a lunatic within meaning of the said expression 'Lunatic' as defined by section 3(5) of The Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. The respondents impleaded in this petition are :(1) Mr. Chetan Sanghi, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Panaji-Goa, (2) Mr. Umesh Gaonkar, … and medical report on the basis of the allegation that the petitioner appeared to be a lunatic.7. On 9-10-1991, Dr. P.J. Dukle, Medical Superintendent of the said Institute made an application to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to extend

Joseph Felix Ferninand Navier Vs. Soucila Engine Juliette Navier

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1991)2MLJ99

dated 19.11.1987 made in I.A. No. 537 of 1984, a petition filed under Section 80 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, in G.O.P. No. 109 of 1970 on the file of the Second Additional District Judge, Pondicherry.2. Certain basic

Smt. Gurmail Kaur and ors. Vs. Smt. Jaswant Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Reported in : (2007)146PLR763

was the alienation of his property which he had inherited from his father.18. Section 3(5) of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 defines the 'lunatic' to mean an idiot or person of unsound mind. In the Chambers Dictionary (Deluxe Edition) … Grade vide his orders dated 30.7.1996. Jaswant Kaur also claimed to be in possession of a Will dated 9.4.1976 in her favour executed by Piara Singh. The said Will was also challenged on the ground that Piara

Johri and ors. Vs. Mahila Draupti Alias Dropadi and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 32, Rules 1, 4, 4A(2) and 4 - Order 41, Rule 33; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 7 and 43; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10, 11 and 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1991MP340; 1991(0)MPLJ217

alienate the suit land, as the transaction of sale was in violation of Section 75 of (the Indian) Lunacy Act, 1912 (for short, the 'Lunacy Act); the contract was void under S. 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 … No. 1 in the suit, aggrieved of the judgment and decree passed in Civil Appeal No. 10-A/1976, on 9-3-1978, by District Judge, Morena, whereby the suit of the plaintiff, a lunatic, has been decree reversing the judgment

Joykutty Mathew Vs. Valsamma Kuruvilla

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19 and 36; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 24

Reported in : AIR1990Ker262; I(1991)DMC479

defined in the Act, but the definition given to the term 'lunatic' in Section 3(5) of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 is adopted by the Indian Divorce Act. Under this definition an idiot is also a lunatic and is … Act; and, (3) whether any fraud was played on the petitioner-husband for obtaining his consent for the marriage. 9. Point No. 3: A perusal of the elaborate petition filed by the husband clearly shows that there are

Om Prakash Gupta Vs. Puspa Kumari

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5

Reported in : ILR1969Delhi953

his own affairs. A similar test would appear to have been adopted in section 38 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912. But the purpose of the Lunacy Act, 1912 as also of the English Mental Health Act, 1959, is … was a ground of disqualification of a person from inheritance. In R. Muthammal v. S. Devasthanam (1) paragraphs 9 and 10, one Ramasami Pillai was held to be insane being a 'gloomy and sickly person with a

Mini Vs. James Koshy Alexander and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ487

fully been dealt with at pages 50 and 283 by Handerson and Gillespie, already referred.11. In the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, the expression 'Lunatic' was defined in Section 3(5) as meaning an idiot or person of unsound mind. The … Section 18 Act 27 of 1866, Section 2 Act 14 of 1912 Section 3' Lunatic, in 8 and 9 vict, C. 100, Section 44, included 'every person whose mind is so affected by disease that it is

In Re: Megal Markus Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 7; Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 53, 54(2), 76 and 96; Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Constitution of India - Article 225; Family Courts Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 62 and 62(1); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 7; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR2006Bom273; 2006(6)ALLMR298

with all or any of the matters specified in this Act;In comparison, under the provisions of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912, District Court Section 3(3) was defined as under:3(3) 'District Court' means the principal civil court of original jurisdiction … another learned Judge (S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.) in petition No. 2 of 2003 In Mental Health Petition No. 9 of 2003 In Land Acquisition Reference No. 58 of 1987. In his order dated 6-8-2004, Dharmadhikari, J. took

Duvvuri Rami Reddi Vs. Duvvudu Papi Reddi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 32, Rule 15

Reported in : AIR1963AP160

15. C. P, C. are different and wider than those under Sections 41 and 64 of the Indian Lunacy Act, 1912; (2) that the holding of an enquiry by the Court under Order 32 Rule 15 C. P. C. … the doctor having been ordered it ought not to have been revoked. 9. In order to appreciate fully those contentions, a few more facts may … Venkatesam, J.1. This is a petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code, to revise the order of the learned Subordinate Judge Nellore, on I.