Advanced Search Results

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

filed Land Acquisition Reference No. 273 of 1983 in the District Court, Pune under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking enhancement of compensation. Simultaneously in the same year 1983 about 10 of the tenants filed Civil … was dismissed but solatium was enhanced to 30% and special component of 12% under section 12(A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was directed to be paid for the period from August 27, 1981 to May 12, 1983. Murudkar

Jalan Trading Co. Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 5-A, 90, 90(2), 90(4), 90(5), 90(6), 91, 91(1), 460-O and 460-P; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 18 and 50(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1870; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1971Bom196; (1970)72BOMLR736; 1971MhLJ712

certain land belonging to the petitioners was being acquired by the State Government under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. The land admeasures 3,118.63 square yards and is situated at Fergusson Road, Lower Parel, Bombay. The notification under … the Corporation, as if such property were land needed for a public purpose within the meaning of the Land Acquisition Act. 1870.'The whole challenge to the acquisition in the present case is based upon this provision of the Municipal

Dau Dayal and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 4(2), 6, 11, 16 and 38

Reported in : AIR1966All237

of fulfilling its object of constructing houses. By a notification under Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, dated July 8, 1957 published in the Utter Pradesh Gazette, dated 13th July 1957, the Collector of … published in the Utter Pradesh Gazette, dated 19-1-1957. The Co-operative Society being a company within the meaning of Land Acquisition Act, proceedings were taken by the State Government under Part VII of that Act. On enquiries made by the

Valjibhai Muljibhai Soneji and anr. Vs. the State of Bombay (Now Gujar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bombay State Road Transport Act, 1950 - Sections 29; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4 and 6; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 47

Reported in : AIR1963SC1890; [1964]3SCR686

only on three grounds : (1) that the purpose mentioned in the notification under s. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was indefinite or vague and, therefore, the notification was bad; (2) that the proceedings were collusive and … was not a local authority but merely a company and as the provisions of Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act were not complied with, the acquisition was bad. 3. Mr. J. C. Bhatt who appears for the appellants

Madhao S/O Atulchandra Bapat Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 11A, 16, 17, 18, 23, 23(1A), 23(2) and 24; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 125, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 127 and 128; DSPE Act - Sections 6; City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141 and 226; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1970; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR32

4 is also heard finally.2. Shri Manohar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 provides for time limit of two years for passing award from the date of publication of notification … of two years for passing award from the date of publication of notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. It was contended that provisions of Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act are applicable to the acquisition

Girnar Traders and Digambar Motiram Jhadhav. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 246, 226; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, (MRTP) 1969 - Sections 126(4)(1)(c)(2), 28, 44, 49(1), 127, 125, 2(7), 17, 30, 43, 68, 69, 72, 72(3), 66; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 12(2), 23(1A), 23(2), 28, 11A; Central Act - Section 23

and Town Planning Act,1966 (for short, `the MRTP Act' or `the State Act') and Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Land Acquisition Act' or `the Central Act') is one of such provisions. Thus, the … MRTP Act' or `the State Act') and Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, `the Land Acquisition Act' or `the Central Act') is one of such provisions. Thus, the Constitution Bench is called upon to examine

Darshan Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 17; Karnataka Town & Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14

Reported in : ILR1996KAR1241

certain lands pursuant to Notification dated 16.7.1994 as at Annexure-A issued under Sections 4(1) and 17 of the Land Acquisition Act (LA Act) by respondent No. 2 and also the Notification issued under Section 6 of the L.A. Act … the provisions of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Act, 1966 and not under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act;(ii) The notifications for acquisition under Annexure-A and B are liable to be set aside;(a) as being vitiated by

Kendra Upadhyaya Sangha (R) Vs. Smt. Muniyamma and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20, 21, 22 and 22(1); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 31, 32 and 73; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : ILR2004KAR575; 2003(2)KarLJ216

for payment of certain amounts in favour of the defendants/landowners on the said lands being acquired under the Land Acquisition Act and the payments were to be made in stages on the happening of the events like issue of … any action under the agreement except for receiving the amounts and facilitating the land being acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. 8. The defendants denied that they have parted possession of the land and pleaded that they never handed

SadruddIn Suleman Jhaveri Vs. J.H. Patwardhan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 245, 254(2), 358 and 366(10); Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2) and 3(4); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 9, 17(1), 17(3) and 17(4); Bombay Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2), 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1965Bom224; (1965)67BOMLR101; ILR1965Bom394; 1965MhLJ290

Kotval, J.(1) In this Special Civil Application there are challenged two Notification under the Land Acquisition Act whereby the land of the petitioner has been taken by the State of Maharashtra the third respondent before … of Maharashtra the third respondent before us. On 24th January 1963 a Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued under the signature of the Commissioner of Bombay Division, the first respondent before us. Since

Murtizapur High School Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 6 and 48

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR720; 2003(1)BomCR114; 2003(2)MhLj258

reference was reserved for 'Extension of Murtizapur High School', issued notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act for acquisition of the land. The notification under Section 6 was published in the weekly 'Pragati' of Akola … further proceeded inasmuch as the Special Land Acquisition Officer issued notices on 25-4-1986 under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act. During the pendency of this case at the stage of notification under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition