Advanced Search Results

Devath Raju Vs The State Represented by

Court : Chennai

318(4), 336(2), 338 and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner’s son was arrayed as A2 and cheated … State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Wing, Tambaram City Police, ..Respondent(s)Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 438 r/w 442 of the BNSS, 2023, praying to set aside the order dated 19.11.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2465

Akash Kumar vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

offences under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/340(2)/336(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 120B/420/471/468 IPC) and Sections 66C/66D of Information Technology Act, (IT Act), 2000 (as amended in 2008).2. The present case was registered by CBI on the basis … Sanhita, (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 120B/420/471/468 IPC) and Sections 66C/66D of Information Technology Act, (IT Act), 2000 (as amended in 2008).2. The present case was registered by CBI on the basis of reliable sourceinformation indicating a massive … dated 01.05.2025, registered at P.S. EO-III Delhi, for commission of offences under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/340(2)/336(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 120B/420/471/468 IPC) and

Mukta Purohit vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

present FIRconcerns grave offences under Sections 354(C)/452/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 66C/66E/67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, as also that the impugned order has been passed without issuance of notice to the complainant. … to time as briefly noticed above, prompted the Parliament to bring into force the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008, which not only inserted the definition of a ‘victim’ under Section 2 (wa) but also statutorily recognised various

A.NITHIN KUMAR Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

2023, 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, 66C and 66D of the Information Technology (Amendement) Act, 2008. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the … The Inspector Police, CCD-1, Cyber Crime Police station, Chennai-South.2. R.Varshini ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.08 of 2025,

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

off and implementation of the Aadhaar scheme.7) On March 03, 2006, approval was given by the Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India for the project titled ‘Unique Identification for BPL Families’ … are created equal, and among their inalienable rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution refers inter alia to security of person, while the Fifth Amendment prohibits inter alia … have challenged the Aadhaar project which took off by way of administrative action in the year 2009. Even after Aadhaar got a shield of statutory … Aadhaar and the architecture built thereupon has received scathing criticism from a section of the society. According to them, Aadhaar is a serious invasion into

State Vs. Rajesh GosaIn and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Session visa-vis the High Court.” 8. It was further submitted that custodial interrogation is necessitated in cases involving Information Technology as the mode of transfer, the extent of transfer and details of all the transferees can only be … Economic Offences Wing u/s 66/66C Information 408/420/120B/IPC Crl. M.C. No.1635/2013 Technology whereas Act, 2000 r/w Crl.M.C.No.1012/2013 Section and M.C.No.1022/2013 have been filed by the complainant … occasions whenever required by the Investigating Officer. The complainant company filed a writ petition before this Court for amendment of the offences in the FIR. A Civil Suit was also filed for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction … (2005) 7 SCC226and Parumal vs. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2008 (3) JCC1631for submitting that co-accused Neeaj Johri has also been granted anticipatory

Vijay Govind Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Session visa-vis the High Court.” 8. It was further submitted that custodial interrogation is necessitated in cases involving Information Technology as the mode of transfer, the extent of transfer and details of all the transferees can only be … Economic Offences Wing u/s 66/66C Information 408/420/120B/IPC Crl. M.C. No.1635/2013 Technology whereas Act, 2000 r/w Crl.M.C.No.1012/2013 Section and M.C.No.1022/2013 have been filed by the complainant … occasions whenever required by the Investigating Officer. The complainant company filed a writ petition before this Court for amendment of the offences in the FIR. A Civil Suit was also filed for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction … (2005) 7 SCC226and Parumal vs. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2008 (3) JCC1631for submitting that co-accused Neeaj Johri has also been granted anticipatory