Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: information technology act 2000 schedule ii · Page 1 of about 1,358 results (0.178 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 02 2013

Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta Advocate Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-02-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

should these be treated as documents as per the provisions of Evidence Act as well as the the Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the “IT Act”.).These types of electronic gadgets are being controlled and prepared through computers … an electronic form or micro film or computer generated micro fiche. Section 92 of IT Act read with Schedule (2) amended the definition of ‘evidence’ as contained in section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act. The amended … CRR No.398 of 2013 (O&M) Laddi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent 2. CRR No.399 of 2013 (O&M) Laddi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ..Respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2022

Thajuddeen E B vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-23-2022

and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short ‘the SC/ST (PA) Act’) and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short ‘IT Act’).4. The petitioner as well as the victim are lawyers by profession. The prosecution case … offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 376 and 506 of IPC, Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short ‘the SC/ST (PA) Act’) and Section 66E of … KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX BY ADVS. R1 BY SRI.P.G.MANU-PUBLIC PROSECUTOR R2 BY SRI.REMIN

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2007

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Asea Brown Boveri Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-05-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)11TTJ(Mum.)502

no reference to the value of the plant, machinery and dead stock. But on the basis of the information that was furnished by the assessee before the ITO it became evident that the sale price had been … that there were internal projections indicating downward trend in the revenues in this segment of activity due to technology obsolescence. This again shows the desire of the assessee to close down this activity and also the absence … The legislature has now removed this difficulty by inserting w.e.f. 1st April, 2000, Section 50B of the Act providing for the levy of capital gains … commission. In this connection, he took us through Schedule 13 to the P&L a/c (p. 102 of … Rs. 62,26,739 being guest house expenses under Section 37(4) of the IT Act. It is submitted that the expenditure of Rs. 62,26,739 includes expenditure on … No. 1 taken by the assessee is dismissed. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 2020

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar Vs. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2020

Subject : Election

injustice.12. Shri Vikas Upadhyay, appearing on behalf of the Intervenor, took us through the various provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 along with Section 65B of the Evidence Act, and argued that Section 65B does not refer to the … by whatever means and whether directly or indirectly;” 29. Section 15(2) of this Act repeals enactments mentioned in Schedule II therein; and Schedule II repeals Part I of the Civil Evidence Act, 1968 - of which Sections 5

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax Vi Vs. Virtual Soft Systems Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-2018

Subject : Direct Taxation

other fixed assets. In addition to the particulars required by statute, e.g., Schedule VI to the Companies Act, 1956, particulars relating to Lease Adjustment Account … on the subject indicates that the Guidance Note on Accounting for Leases was issued by it for the first time in 1988 which was later on revised in 1995. The Guidance Note reflects the best practices adopted … the Respondent - M/s Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. is a company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. (b) On 29.12.1999, the Respondent filed return of income for the Assessment Year 1999-2000 declaring loss of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2005

Diebold Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-31-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 5(3), 22A, 22A(1), 22A(2) and 24(1); Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 27E(1); Information Technology Act, 2000; Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2210; [2006]144STC59(Kar)

Commercial Taxes in his order dated 29.11.2003, while revising the order passed by the Advance Ruling Authority?27. The information Technology Act, 2000, is an Act to provide legal recognition for transactions carried out by means of electronic data interchange and … requested the Authority to classify ATM's as goods falling under Entry 20 of Part 'C' of the Second Schedule to the Act and not Electronic goods falling under Entry 4 of Part 'E' of Second Schedule to … Section 22-A(1) of the Act by issuing a show cause notice dated 2.9.2003, interalia directing the appellant company to show cause, why the order passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 01 2011

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-01-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 (2) (g); 354, 363, 366, 506; The Information Technology Act 2000 - Section 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act - Section 6

fine of `2,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 5. Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. - Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of `10,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for … Shubhkhera, thus became familiar to each other. They used to go to School together. Their annual examination was scheduled to be held in the month of March, 2008. On 1st March, 2008, PW1 appeared in the paper … of `5,000/-. In default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 2. 366 I.P.C. - Rigorous Imprisonment for four years and fine of `10,000/-.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2014

Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Private Limited and Another Vs. Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

SeTS (Secured e-Tendering System). He submitted that the system is fool proof, in compliance with the Information and Technology Act, 2000 and adheres to the standards, guidelines and policies of various regulatory bodies including of the Central Vigilance Commissioner … his bid within the bid validity specified in the Bid Specification. OR ii) The successful bidder fails to submit performance guarantee and/or to execute contract … explanation for the haste with which the price bids were opened. In contrast, the techno-commercial bids which were scheduled to be opened on 23rd June 2014, were ultimately opened only on 15th July 2014. This conduct gives

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2023

P.V. Gangadharan vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-22-2023

the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Information Technology Act, 2000, Criminal Rules of Practice, Kerala, Civil Rules of Practice, Kerala and Rules of the High Court of Kerala, … and submission through electronic video linkage can be taken up if an application in the form prescribed in Schedule II is filed. Rule 7 deals with the service of summons, Rule 8 provides for the examination of persons,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2025

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2025

ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT DECLARING THAT SECTION 79(3)(b) OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 (IT ACT) DOES NOT CONFER AUTHORITY TO ISSUE INFORMATION BLOCKING ORDERS UNDER THE IT ACT, AND FURTHER DECLARE … and Information Technology’s Office Memorandum dated 31.10.2023 bearing No. 1(4)/2020-CLES-1. (Annexure- C) ii. Respondent No. 3 - Ministry of Home Affairs’ notification dated 13.03.2024 bearing … sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shallaffect the operation of any existing law in so

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial