Advanced Search Results

Mr. Kamla Kant Dube and Another Vs. M.V. Umang and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9-A, 20 and 120; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 214, 215, 225, 226 and 372; States Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 49 and 52; Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 28, 30 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1 and 2; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891; Sea Act, 1925; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 3(15); Admiralty Court Act, 1861 - Sections 6; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556

the Bombay Land Revenue Code along with English translation of relevant extract, marked Annexure C, the notification extending Indian Ports Act, 1908 to the Port of Kandla with effect from April 1, 1950 marked Annexure 'D' and the certificate by … paragraphs, particularly 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 30, 44, 48, 49, 56, 58, 59, 65, 66, 67, 68, 72, 75, 78, 80, 83, 85, 88, … claim as and by way of damages for the estate of the deceased is under the provisions of section 2 (proviso) of the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 and compensation for the loss of dependency under provisions of

State of Gujarat and ors. Vs. the Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxation

Reported in : (1979)1GLR732

Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (1908 Act) extended the provisions of the said Act to the Port of Kandla with effect from 1st … payable to, the Commissioners, shall be held by the Commissioners in trust for the purposes of the Act. Section 58 provides for acquisition of land or building for the purpose of the Act through the instrumentality of the

Mumbai Port Trust Vs. M/S. Shri Lakshmi Steels and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

relating to the constitution and powers of any Port authority in a major port as defined in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.17. Shri Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India submits that the High Court … rate or of any charge leviable in special case, for the 14 reasons to be recorded in writing. Section 58 deals with time for payment of rates on goods. Section 59 of the Act provides that the Board

Lakshman Gowroji Nakhwa Vs. Ramji Antone Nakhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1921Bom93; (1921)23BOMLR939

provisions as to removing obstructions and paying compensation will be found in Sections 10 and 12 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908, which was amended by Act VI of 1916, but I do not think I need pursue that.64. Then … to the earth.'57. He next relies on the definition of easement in the Indian Limitation Act IX of 1908. Section 2(5) says: -Easement' includes a right not arising from contract, by which one person is entitled to remove … in ease, is a proper mode of seeking that remedy.29. At p. 58 he says:I asked the learned counsel for the defendants whether, if the

Sushant T. Karwarkar Vs. Mormugao Port Trust and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1) and 5A; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) (Inapplicability of Major Ports) Act, 1997; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Major Port Trust Act, 1963; Indian Ports Act, 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(3)ALLMR493; 2006(2)BomCR915; [2006(110)FLR905]

(Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948. Section 2(d) defines 'Major Port' to have the same meaning as in the Indian Ports Act, 1908.9. Section 4 of the Act deals with the transfer of assets and liabilities of the Dock Labour … 19-5-1982 were declared surplus and retired at premature age of 45/50 years as against the retirement age of 58 years, with all consequential retirement benefits.3. The case of the petitioner/s is that the Chairman of the MDLB,

The Trustees of the Port of Madras by Its Chairman Vs. K.P.V. Sheik Mo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act - Sections 148, 151, 152 and 161

Reported in : [1963]Supp2SCR915

vessels, passengers or goods excepting the services in respect of vessels for which fees are chargeable under the Indian Ports Act, 1908 (XV of 1908).' 18. Section 44 provides that every scale and every statement of conditions framed by the … for sale in the case of perishable goods in the custody of the Board, in the Gazette and section 58 provides for giving notice to the owner of the goods of his address is known. Section 59 provides

The Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

section 2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited - (2023) 5 CENTAX 58 (SC); - 12 -(xiv) Asha R. vs. ACCT - (2025) 29 CENTAX 391 (KAR);(xv) Commissioner of Central Excise

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

section 2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited - (2023) 5 CENTAX 58 (SC); - 12 -(xiv) Asha R. vs. ACCT - (2025) 29 CENTAX 391 (KAR);(xv) Commissioner of Central Excise

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

section 2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited - (2023) 5 CENTAX 58 (SC); - 12 -(xiv) Asha R. vs. ACCT - (2025) 29 CENTAX 391 (KAR);(xv) Commissioner of Central Excise

Bank of Baroda vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

section 2 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 or in clause (4) of section 3 of the Indian Ports Act, 1908;(39) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Chapter; [(39a) “ Print media” means(i) “ book” as … & K); (xiii) Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. Edelweiss Financial Services Limited - (2023) 5 CENTAX 58 (SC); - 12 -(xiv) Asha R. vs. ACCT - (2025) 29 CENTAX 391 (KAR);(xv) Commissioner of Central Excise