Advanced Search Results

B. Shankar and ors. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 9; Identification of Prisoners Act 1920 - Sections 2 and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 116, 161, 437(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395, 396, 399, 400 and 402

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2242

at Karimnagar in several Sessions Cases tried for offences under Sections 395, 396, 399, 400 and 402 of Indian Penal Code (IPC). Inasmuch as many of the appellants figured as accused in several cases and since common questions of fact … and common judgments were rendered therein. 3. In S.C. No. 456/91, A1to A6 were tried for offences under Section 395 IPC. It is the case of the prosecution that on the intervening night of 30th November and 1st

Kerma and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 412; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 27

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT256; 2004(2)MPLJ110

passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Karera in Sessions Trial No. 290/99 convicting them under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and sentencing them to suffer R.I. seven years and fine Rs. 2000/-, in

Mainul Sheikh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 397

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2401

for undergoing remaining part of the sentence. Criminal - Corroboration of Evidence - Sections 395 and 397 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Appellants looted cash of passengers of bus during travel - Appellants tried under Section 395

GayasuddIn Khan Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 412

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3296

in Sessions Trial No. 27 of 1978. convicting the sole appellant under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years on each count, ordering to run both the … 1978. convicting the sole appellant under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years … eye witness, has claimed that there were only four miscreants, then the charge framed against this appellant under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code has no leg to stand, as there were only four miscreants. If the

Kumar Alias Kumaresan Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 395, 394, 397, 161; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 374(2)

cancelled.(v) Fine amount, if any paid by the appellants is ordered to be refunded to them. [R.MALA, J.] Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 395, 394, 397, 161 -- The admitted portion of confession was marked as Ex.P6. The … Court (Fast Track Court No.1), Erode., whereby the accused 1 to 4 were convicted for the offence under Section 395 IPC and sentenced them to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and A1 and A2 were convicted for the

Venkatesh @ Seena Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1218; 1992(2)KarLJ16

other persons were arraigned as Accused Nos.2 to 5. The charge was one under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. During the course of the trial, Accused No. 3 Narayanappa was absconding. Therefore, the trial proceeded against the … found to be unsustainable as assembly of five persons is necessary to make the offence under Section 395 IPC. Their Lordships held:'Before an offence under Section 395 can be made out there must be an assembly of

Sharaf Shah Khan and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 237, 410 and 428; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395, 400 and 411; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 14, 54 and 114

Reported in : AIR1963AP314; 1963CriLJ121

P. C. He convicted accused 1, 2, 6, 14, 19, 21, 23, 24, and 27 under Section 400 Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to imprisonment for life. Accused 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 17 and 18 … 2, 6, 14, 19, 21, 23, 24, and 27 under Section 400 Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to imprisonment for life. Accused 3, 4, … 20, 22, 25, 26 and 28 and convicted the remaining 18 accused either under Section 400, or under Section 395 I. P. C. He convicted accused 1, 2, 6, 14, 19, 21, 23, 24, and 27 under Section

Musku Pentu and anr. Vs. State of A.P. Represented by Public Prosecuto ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 390, 392 and 395

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1358

2. Sri P. Raghava Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the ingredients of Section 395 IPC are not at all satisfied and it is doubtful how many persons are said to have participated in … counsel for the appellants would submit that the ingredients of Section 395 IPC are not at all satisfied and it is doubtful how many persons … Criminal Appeal. 2. Sri P. Raghava Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the ingredients of Section 395 IPC are not at all satisfied and it is doubtful how many persons are said to have participated … of the II Additional Sessions Judge at Warangal, had preferred the present Criminal Appeal. 2. Sri P. Raghava Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants would

Raghav Chandra and ors. Vs. Smt. Tarvinder Kaur

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 165(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 197 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395, 427 and 448

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2205; 2003(1)MPHT151

to the concerning J.M.F.C. Criminal - Sanction to Prosecute - Quashing - Sections 395, 427 and 448 of Indian Penal Code,1860 (IPC) and Section 197 of Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (Cr.PC) - Respondent filed criminal complaint for offence

Diwakar Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1775; [2007(4)JCR31(Jhr)]

J.1. The appellant along with one Moharlal Mirdha were tried for the charge under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code (for short IPC) whereas, Moharlal Mirdha was acquitted, the appellant has been convicted under Section 395 IPC and