Advanced Search Results

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Krishan Lal Pardhan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120-B, 218, 379, 411, 420 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 173 and 239

Reported in : AIR1987SC773; 1987CriLJ709; JT1987(1)SC359; 1987(1)SCALE261; (1987)2SCC17

five others for commission of offences punishable under Sections 379, 411, 420, 218, 468 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5(2)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Investigation revealed that the accused had entered into … five others for commission of offences punishable under Sections 379, 411, 420, 218, 468 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5(2)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Investigation revealed that the accused had

Md. Umar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 411

Rail (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation of theft of Rs. 700/-. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to … of 2011 for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation of theft of Rs. 700/-. In that … No. 24 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 30 of 2011. [H.C. Mishra] - Indian Penal Code - Section 379 -- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused

Smarty Machra and anr. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 379, 380 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219, 219(2) and 223

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4341

same kind when they are punishable with the same amount of punishment under the same section of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) or of any special or local laws:Provided that, for the purposes of this section, an … of the place of incident were also prepared at their instance. After completing the investigation, a charge-sheet under Section 379/411/34 IPC was filed against both the accused.4. Before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, the learned Counsel appearing for the

Anasuri Simhadri Vs. Superintendent, Central Prison, Rajahmundry and a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379 and 411

Reported in : 1992(3)ALT706; 1993CriLJ1289

concurrence running of sentences - Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 379 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - application filed by accused under Section 482 requesting Court for issue of direction that sentences of … were recovered at one time. The Police filed three separate charge-sheets for offences under sections 379 and 411, IPC. They were registered as C.Cs. Nos. 61/91, 62/91 and 63/91. 2. There was no material to connect the

Narayan Mahto @ Narayan Chandra Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand and o ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972 - Rule 40 and 40(1); Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2004 - Rule 57; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379 and 411

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR254

the Supreme Court, I hold that Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concession Rules 2004 is a special law whereas the Indian Penal Code under which the FIR has been lodged is a general statute. Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concession Rules 2004 provides … Nala (Binda Pathar) P.S. Case No. 16/2005 registered under Sections 379 and 411 I.P.C. against the petitioner and two others as contained in Annexure-4 to … he was also arrested in connection with Nala (Binda Pathar) P.S. Case No. 76/1999, which was registered under Section 379 IPC in which charge sheet has already been submitted. It is further stated that the petitioner was involved

Amarnath Umakanth Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 427(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379 and 411

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD671; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)10; 1999(4)ALT22; 1999CriLJ3801

- Sections 427 (1) and 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Sections 379 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - petitioner convicted in two different cases for two different offences - earlier one offence committed under … ORDERMotilal B. Naik 1. Petitioner was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 379 IPC by the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Banaganapalli in CC No.30 of 1997 and sentenced to undergo rigorous

Shyamal Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC)1860 - Sections 302, 201, 379, 411, 34; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC),(CrPC) 1973 - Section 164, 161, 313; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 8

Shyamal Ghosh, were charged with offences under Sections 302, 201, 379, 411 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short, the 'IPC'). All these accused were found to be guilty of the offences with which they

N.D.M.C. and anr. Vs. Mohd. Shamim and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 2, 12, 12A and 13A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2J; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 380 and 411; Factories Act - Sections 2(M) and 2K; Model Standing Orders - Rules 1B and 13; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Central Rules, 1946; Central Civil Service Rules; Model Standing Rules

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR155]; (2003)IILLJ81Del

to disclose that he was involved in a criminal case under Section 379, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as, 'I.P.C.').4. In view of the rival contentions, as noticed … to disclose that he was involved in a criminal case under Section 379, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as, 'I.P.C.').4. In view of the rival contentions,

Bhanwaria and ors., Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 376, 376(2), 379, 392 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3742

Phoosaram was held guilty of the offences under Sections 376(2)(g) and 411, IPC and he was sentenced to life imprisonment together with a fine of … fine of Rs. 500/- and in default, to further undergo six month's rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 379, IPC. The sentences awarded to accused-appellants Bhanwariya son of Phoosaram, Gutiya alias Bhutiya alias Devaram and Sriram on … observed that corrboration is not the sine qua non for a conviction in a rape case. In the Indian setting, refusal to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault in the absence of corroboration … : 1972CriLJ1296 , wherein it has been held that FIR in a criminal case is an extremely vital and valuable piece of evidence for the

Pilli Vital Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 337, 376, 377, 379 and 411

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3240

indicated above. 9. Order accordingly. Criminal - circumstantial evidence - Sections 302, 376, 377, 379 and 411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - in case of circumstantial evidence it is duty of prosecution to establish that all links only … were convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life. They were also convicted under Section 379 IPC and sentenced to suffer RI for 3 years. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently. 2.