Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md. Umar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Md. Umar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided May 26, 2011
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917760

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
B.A. No. 2624 of 2011
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[H.C. Mishra] – Indian Penal Code - Section 379 -- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rail (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation of t...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 411

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md. Umar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 411

Excerpt

[h.c. mishra] - indian penal code - section 379 -- heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. petitioner has been made accused in connection with rail (ranchi) p.s. case no. 24 of 2011 for the offence under sections 379 and 411 of the indian penal code. there is allegation of theft of rs. 700/-. in that view of the matter, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.  accordingly, the petitioner, md. umar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, (railway), ranchi in connection with rail (ranchi) p.s. case no. 24 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 30 of 2011.1. pursuant to the order dated 04.05.2011 passed by this court, the petitioner has surrendered before the court below and to this effect, and supplementary affidavit has been filed along with the order passed by the court below. 2. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. petitioner has been made accused in connection with rail (ranchi) p.s. case no. 24 of 2011 for the offence under sections 379 and 411 of the indian penal code. there is allegation of theft of rs. 700/-. in that view of the matter, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.  accordingly, the petitioner, md. umar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, (railway), ranchi in connection with rail (ranchi) p.s. case no. 24 of 2011 corresponding to g.r. no. 30 of 2011.

Full Judgment

1. Pursuant to the order dated 04.05.2011 passed by this Court, the petitioner has surrendered before the court below and to this effect, and supplementary affidavit has been filed along with the order passed by the court below.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rail (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation of theft of Rs. 700/-. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. 

Accordingly, the petitioner, Md. Umar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, (Railway), Ranchi in connection with Rail (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 30 of 2011.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial