Advanced Search Results

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. the Delhi Development ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 148, 149, 151, 152, 160 and 161; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 18, Rule 17-A; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 53-B(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 523; Delhi Police Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 117

Reported in : AIR1991Delhi298; ILR1991Delhi634

proper time, the defendants were responsible for any loss occasioned to the plaintiffs. U/ S. 148 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a bailment is defined as the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon … and to make amends or settle the claim, if so advised without litigation. The legislative intention behind that section is that public money and time should not be wasted on unnecessary litigation and the Government and the … both u/ S. 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure and S. 53-B(l) of the Delhi Development Act, 1957. The defendants ' however, defaulted in

Commissioners for the Port of Calcutta Vs. General Trading Corporation ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 74E and 80; ;Calcutta Port Act, 1890 - Section 142; ;Limitation Act - Section 15(2); ;Sale of Goods Act - Section 23; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 103 and 178; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 137; ;Bills of Lading Act, 1856; ;English Bills of Lading Act, 1855

Reported in : AIR1964Cal290,68CWN410

by toe receipt was an instrument of title to goods within the meaning of Section 103 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The appellants in that case were a firm of commission agents who had been instructed by one Chhaganlal … Factors Act, 1842 and again in Section 1 (4) of the English Factors Act of 1889 (52 and 53 Vict. c. 45) which was adopted by Section 62 of the English Sale of Goods Act, 1893 (56

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Bhaskar Krishnaji Samant

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1925Bom485; (1925)27BOMLR973

paid in case of a breach of the conditions thereof may, notwithstanding anything in Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, be recovered from him in case of such breach as if it were an arrear of land-revenue.16. It … was made under the Motor Vehicles Act, but failed : Emperor v. Baker (1921) 24 Bom. L.R. 50, 53 .62. The cases referred to by Kincaid J. in his judgment have no bearing on the point under

Thakumal (Since Deceased) Through L.Rs. Mamtabai and ors. Vs. Chakradh ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Reported in : AIR2009Chh27; 2009(1)MPHT17(CG)

Shankar Rao Bhosle had agreed to sell the suit house to Thakumal Sindhi. Under Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement without consideration is void. For want of consideration, the receipt (Exh. D-1) cannot be construed as … performance was also not filed by Thakumal Sindhi, he was not entitled to protect his possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It was also held that by notice dated 2-4-1984 (Exh. P-1),

Lacoste vs Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

need to be <clear, specific, and mutually acknowledged= to be binding by relying on Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to contend that the letter dated 10.02.1989 (Ex. DW 1/24), even if considered a unilateral proposal, was accepted … original composition or compilation without the necessity of its registration. [Satsang v. Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhyay, AIR 1972 Calcutta 533 (V 59 C 114)]. Registration of the work under the Act is not compulsory and registration is not

Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. vs La Chemise Lacoste and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

need to be “clear, specific, and mutually acknowledged” to be binding by relying on Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, to contend that the letter dated 10.02.1989 (Ex. DW 1/24), even if considered a unilateral proposal, was accepted … original composition or compilation without the necessity of its registration. [Satsang v. Kiron Chandra Mukhopadhyay, AIR 1972 Calcutta 533 (V 59 C 114)]. Registration of the work under the Act is not compulsory and registration is not

S.A. Zahir Hussain and Another Vs. T. Somasundaram

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

miscellaneous petition if any is closed. Civil Procedure Code- Section 100 - Transfer of Property Act Section 53(A) Indian Contract Act, 1872 Section 2(b),(e),(h) Specific Relief Act Section 5, Section 6, Section 22 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Order 39 Rule

Corporation Bank Vs. Mohandas Baliga

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34; Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 - Sections 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23, 133, 134, 135, 139 and 141

Reported in : ILR1993KAR201; 1993(1)KarLJ308

11 and 11.1 of the Judgment, therefore, it is necessary to reproduce the same:'9. Chapter VIII of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') deals with indemnity and guarantee. Section 124 defines the expression 'Contract of … Account No. 1/80. According to the contents of the acknowledgement, the outstanding balance as on 30-9-83 was Rs. 53,729/- inclusive of interest and incidental charges debited till 30-9-83. There was legal notice issued by the plaintiff to

Soott and Hodgson, Limited Vs. Keshavlal Nathubhai Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1930Bom529; (1930)32BOMLR1065

law for the time being in England.28. We were also referred to the authorities which show that the Indian Contract Act, 1872, is not a complete Code, and that if there is a clear omission in the Act to provide … not pass until the whole of the purchase-price had been paid, was valid and effective having regard to Sections 83 and 77 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872. There were several other issues raised in the … Council in Maneckji Pestonji Bharucha v. Wadilal Harabhai & Co. (1926) L.R. 53 I. A. 92, 28 Bom. L.R. 777. That was a case of

Munna Lal Vs. the East Indian Railway Company

Court : Allahabad

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : 82Ind.Cas.772

to the law upon the subject. That law is very clearly laid down in Section 226 of the Indian Contract Act and it is unnecessary to discuss whether the principles' of Dyer v. Munday (1895) 1 Q.B. 742 : … arrived at by my learned brother. Railways Act (IX of 1800), s. If - Contract Act (IX of 1872), s. I51--Bailment of goods--Station Master retaining goods--Liability of Railway--Bailee, duty of. - - (2) That the consignment arrived … of strawboard from Howrah to Agra City in two waggons one containing 53 bales weighing 362 maunds 1 seer, and the other containing 48 bales