Advanced Search Results

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi /acb

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … offences under IPC has been marked through Dr.Bagadi Gautham (PW-34) as Ex.P.143. 96102. In terms of Ex.P.143/69(c), the details are enumerated regarding the complaint against

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … offences under IPC has been marked through Dr.Bagadi Gautham (PW-34) as Ex.P.143. 96102. In terms of Ex.P.143/69(c), the details are enumerated regarding the complaint against

Sri.s. Muthaiah Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … offences under IPC has been marked through Dr.Bagadi Gautham (PW-34) as Ex.P.143. 96102. In terms of Ex.P.143/69(c), the details are enumerated regarding the complaint against

Sri S Muthaiah Vs. State By Cbi

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

UNDER IPC A.2. SANCTION FOR PROSECUTION UNDER SECTION19OF P.C. ACT A.3. SANCTION AS REGARDS OFFENCES UNDER THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 B. APPLICATION OF MIND AND CONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS BY THE SANCTIONING AUTHORITY - B.1. W.P.NO.19179/2021 (SPL.CC. NO.135/2013) B.2. … PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF THE2CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN SPECIAL CC NO.135/2013 WHICH WAS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE … offences under IPC has been marked through Dr.Bagadi Gautham (PW-34) as Ex.P.143. 96102. In terms of Ex.P.143/69(c), the details are enumerated regarding the complaint against

Smt Jeanne Pinto Vs. Deputy Conservator Of Forests

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

never as forest land, as can be seen from the statement showing Section 4 declared under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 areas included in forest reserve as per Deputy Commissioner Notification dated 05.06.2002, wherein the plaintiff’s survey numbers are … impugned judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court, in exercise of appellate powers of this Court under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure.41. Though the learned counsel for the appellant/ plaintiff relied upon the dictum

M/S S P P Foods Products Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Hannu Marketing

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Hindustan Forest Company v. Lal Chand & Others, AIR1959SC1349and Kesharichand Jaisukhal v. Shillong Banking … to be based on an open, mutual and current account as envisaged under Article 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The relevant pages of the statement of account which have been filed at pages 76, 77 and 81 … Appl. Nos. 37553/2018 (for stay), 37555/2018 (for taking on record additional documents) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment

Wimpy International Ltd. Vs.gulshan Dhingra

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ratios of the Supreme Court judgments in the cases of Hindustan Forest Company Vs. Lal Chand & Others, AIR1959SC1349and Kesharichand Jaisukhal Vs. Shillong Banking … of 1.6.2001, the period of limitation of three years will commence as per Article 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963 on 1.4.2002. Suit therefore filed on 5.7.2004 i.e within three years from 1.4.2002 will be within limitation. I … RFA No.1053/2017 Page 1 of 12 RFA No.1053/2017 and C.M. No.46184/2017 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment

M/S Continental Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Karan & Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

an open, mutual and current account. An open, mutual and current account under Article 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would only exist if there are shifting RFA5772006 Page 5 of 7 balances vide Hindustan Forest Company v.. … To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DEMAND AND COLLECT FOREST DEVELOPMENT TAX UNDER SECTION98A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963 ON THE VALUE OF MINERAL SOLD BY THE PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF THE MINING LEASES GRANTED UNDER THE … & R.2) ***** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION98 OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT1993AND NOTIFICATION DT. 16.8.2008 PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE ON278.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE B DOES

Kottayam Nature Society Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3 and 96

Reported in : 2003(3)KLT1105

any other body'. It has been pointed out that the Department of Forest and Wild Life in association with the petitioner-society had undertaken a bird … Still more, the land was taken over by the State under the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963. It can be used only for the purposes as envisaged in S.96 and for no other. The lease … was taken.10. The Island has an area of 49.86 acres. Reliance has been placed on the provisions of Section 96(1-A) to contend that the action is legal and valid.11. Mr. Kamala Kannan, the Managing Director of the Kerala